Star Wars: The Force Awakens (12/18/15)

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (12/18/15) Discussion Thread

Being able to review what you've shot allows you to try and avoid having to fix things in post.

Its not exactly hard to run film through a scanner these days. They may even have film cameras that immediately run the film through a scanner. I don't know, but I doubt its difficult to know that your last shot stunk, film or not. It seemed to work well for a century.
 
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (12/18/15) Discussion Thread

It's stuff like if you're doing a shoot over multiple days being able to view something you shot yesterday to make sure that something isn't out of place. With digital you can view what you're filming on an HD TV, I'm not sure you can do that with a film camera. Having a larger view like that can help spot problems. And as far as film development, it can take a few days to have film get digitized so you don't get the opportunity to review footage until much later. With digital you can immediately review what you just shot. And if you really wanted to, you could even watch what you just shot cut together with stuff that you've previously shot.
 
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (12/18/15) Discussion Thread

This is really a great discussion you guys are having... I'm learning a lot.

Thanks.
 
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (12/18/15) Discussion Thread

It's stuff like if you're doing a shoot over multiple days being able to view something you shot yesterday to make sure that something isn't out of place. With digital you can view what you're filming on an HD TV, I'm not sure you can do that with a film camera. Having a larger view like that can help spot problems. And as far as film development, it can take a few days to have film get digitized so you don't get the opportunity to review footage until much later. With digital you can immediately review what you just shot. And if you really wanted to, you could even watch what you just shot cut together with stuff that you've previously shot.

I work in advertising, and unfortunately, the ease with which something can be reviewed, and revised if need be, just seems to make people lazy.
People don't seem to pay that much attention to detail and getting it absolutely right the first time around, 'cause you can just "fix" it digitally later on.
It's a shame.
When I look at gorgeous movies like Lawrence of Arabia, Ben Hur or even later stuff, like The Man Who Fell To Earth or Blade Runner, I just marvel at how cinematographer's just got it right in camera.
Nowadays it's all about "fixing" it digitally.

Look at Excalibur and how beautiful the forests look. That was all in camera.
Now look at the extras in LOTR. The raw footage just looks like crap. Very sad.
 
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (12/18/15) Discussion Thread

It would look worse. :wink1:
 
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (12/18/15) Discussion Thread

The Hobbit was shot with a digital camera that didn't exist back in 2000. :lol
 
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (12/18/15) Discussion Thread

The Hobbit looks pretty good though

It looked awful but I will not blame the digital cameras for that. 48FMS is a whole other topic that hopefully won't become popular with other filmmakers.
 
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (12/18/15) Discussion Thread

One really has to wonder if they're still casting (unless it's a complete rope-a-dope), how the hell they're going to finish this and expect it to be on par with even the prequels in just a little over two years. :lol
 
Last edited:
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (12/18/15) Discussion Thread

two years …. they have two years until the release.. still doable
 
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (12/18/15) Discussion Thread

happens.. :) wish they produced it since a year already and the wait would be just one year ahead.. that would be nice...
 
Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (12/18/15) Discussion Thread

happens.. :) wish they produced it since a year already and the wait would be just one year ahead.. that would be nice...

Yeah, it always seemed like there were at minimum 3 years for the process, one for approval, one for preproduction and then one for shooting and effects.
 
Back
Top