- Joined
- Mar 13, 2010
- Messages
- 28,004
- Reaction score
- 31,987
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi SPOILER DISCUSSION THREAD
For me the OT grew with the novels, and lasted through 1979 with Brian Daley's Han Solo trilogy, through L. Neil Smith's Lando trilogy, and the novels that went up until the late 1990s, and maybe beyond.
They felt true to the universe and the characters. And as they progressed into the future beyond the films they largely felt like a seamless extension. The stories honoured a tradition, and felt right. They were as good as having films
But in print there are no ageing actors or the concerns of real world production.
As the years passed beyond 1983 it seamed less and less likely that Lucas would realise his dream. Then The Phantom Menace happened.
Then the Sequels kill off Han and Luke, and we never did get to see all those printed adventures in between; the family Han and Leia had; Thrawn and the Remnant; and all those star hopping quests. But at least they still survive, even though Disney have consigned them to non-canonical 'Legends'.
What we have now is Star Wars: The Next Generation, because the films were delayed until it was too late to do anything else. Hence, a large anti-climax if you were around when Lucas spoke of nine films.
By contrast, Rogue One was a near perfect film. If only they hadn't changed the Stormtrooper armour, or stolen the ending from These Final Hours.
You can pick and choose your own canon, and the Sequels won't be part of mine because I already have a head full of better stories. Better leave Rey, Finn, Donald Ducktroopers and Porgs to the kids.
Then there's the Han Solo movie, and the question of how well it will succeed in capturing the past for the present.
Let's just be honest and say it how it is, in that anything outside of the OT isn't canon because the OT is what many of us grew up with, so it's got that nostalgia factor.
For me the OT grew with the novels, and lasted through 1979 with Brian Daley's Han Solo trilogy, through L. Neil Smith's Lando trilogy, and the novels that went up until the late 1990s, and maybe beyond.
They felt true to the universe and the characters. And as they progressed into the future beyond the films they largely felt like a seamless extension. The stories honoured a tradition, and felt right. They were as good as having films
But in print there are no ageing actors or the concerns of real world production.
As the years passed beyond 1983 it seamed less and less likely that Lucas would realise his dream. Then The Phantom Menace happened.
Then the Sequels kill off Han and Luke, and we never did get to see all those printed adventures in between; the family Han and Leia had; Thrawn and the Remnant; and all those star hopping quests. But at least they still survive, even though Disney have consigned them to non-canonical 'Legends'.
What we have now is Star Wars: The Next Generation, because the films were delayed until it was too late to do anything else. Hence, a large anti-climax if you were around when Lucas spoke of nine films.
By contrast, Rogue One was a near perfect film. If only they hadn't changed the Stormtrooper armour, or stolen the ending from These Final Hours.
You can pick and choose your own canon, and the Sequels won't be part of mine because I already have a head full of better stories. Better leave Rey, Finn, Donald Ducktroopers and Porgs to the kids.
Then there's the Han Solo movie, and the question of how well it will succeed in capturing the past for the present.