- Joined
- Mar 13, 2010
- Messages
- 27,965
- Reaction score
- 31,898
What test? Post Modernism doesn't have criteria for what constitutes coherence. That's the problem. They make claims about epistemology without having one. You can't just make statements in a vacuum, and be persuasive.
That's why I said I wasn't a post modernist. I added an extra bit in the post following that:
(You could also do a Marxist reading of a work without being a Marxist).
It was the starting point, a jumping off point if you will.
View the world/text from a new perspective, which isn't defined by set ideologies, and accept that there are multiple possibilities. The alternative is to dissect every text according to a religious devotion to one ideology or another, which necessarily guides the outcome because there's a politicial motivation.
I'm not, and wasn't, concerned with how post modernism views science. It was the History degree that guided the process of the English degree, and vice versa. From the process of writing about history comes the denial of absolutes. There are certain things that you cannot claim to be absolutely true, because we don't have enough (or any) evidence to establish it. You form theories from sifting through evidence, and making judgements as best you can based on what you have access to.
It's not post modernism, but a common sense approach.