Tell that to Pete "Maverick" MitchellYa can't go back.
Tell that to Pete "Maverick" MitchellYa can't go back.
Exception that proves the rule?Tell that to Pete "Maverick" Mitchell
That’s what was dc’s problem from the start. They never trusted there characters. I don’t like snyders movies but atleast the man pulled from existing stories and made suits from existing stories and tried to incorporate them into love action .Maybe you’re right, Snyder got a lot right imo. Just missed on the big aspects, his tone was great but the storytelling rushed. If only we could have got some more world building (especially with batman) I think the first few years of Snyderverse could have been saved easily. The rest however….
Eh, the topic has been discussed to death at this point.
As long as WB doesn’t touch Reeve’s Bats, Gunn can do what ever the hell this is turning into.
Too bad they can’t find a way to go in the direction of the Animated adventures, BTAS/Arkham Etc. Imagine a Mask of the Phantasm live action movie or something similar adapting something from the Superman Animated Show.
Looks 10% better without the undies.Also idk if these were posted but this suit could have looked different so many ways. View attachment 710693View attachment 710694
Nope 100% worse.Looks 10% better without the undies.
A lot riding on it.
If it fails then say bye bye to dc superhero films for decades to come
So you’re saying that studio is healthy and funded enough that it can just continuously keep losing $300 million with no consequences?Not really. Not in today's cinematic dulldrums.
Until the reboot 2 years later.
Have you been paying attention the last 20+ years? How many Batman movies has there been?
So you’re saying that studio is healthy and funded enough that it can just continuously keep losing $300 million with no consequences?
Flying dogs though... for me, that's going too far in the other direction. But thesealspublic will probably love it.
Seems like it, doesn't it? They keep making these $200-300 million movies that tank. And yet they still keep making and remaking the same 12 movies.
They’re called Pit Bulls lolThe idea of a dog with Superman's powers is kind of terrifying.
View attachment 710793View attachment 710794
Since tdkr there was bvs and then the Batman. So maybe like three? It was spread out.Not really. Not in today's cinematic dulldrums.
Until the reboot 2 years later.
Have you been paying attention the last 20+ years? How many Batman movies has there been?
Since tdkr there was bvs and then the Batman. So maybe like three? It was spread out.
Have a Pitty, can confirm. At least he has the attitude of a Clark and not a Zod.They’re called Pit Bulls lol
Ahh.. A true Batman fan, just because Batman is in a movie does *not* make it a batman movie.Since tdkr there was bvs and then the Batman. So maybe like three? It was spread out.
Have you forgotten Batman and Robin? It almost destroyed the brand and dc was hesitant to even touch Batman again .
Lest we forget that Batman use to be a huge laughing stock for a short period of time. Those bat nipples wouldn’t go away. Dc is reactionary. I wouldn’t put it past them to sell the rights to Disney if this universe doesn’t take off
Well affleck never got his stand-alone film tbh.3? There were 3 movies of Nolan's Batman alone. How many Affleck movies? Plus The Batman. Plus, The Flash. All in less than 20 years. That's crazy.
A crime. But do we really think it would have been on Par with Reeves? Maybe… it could of been extremely close to what a lot of Batman fans wanted.Well affleck never got his stand-alone film tbh.
Enter your email address to join: