Happy 71st birthday Sigourney!
Happy 71st birthday Sigourney!
With regard to ALIEN and ALIENS I can see why many would prefer the original, especially if you saw it in the theater in 1979 and were a fan for 7 long years prior to the sequel. But ALIENS is really only surpassed by SW/ESB and FOTR for me. Truly an all-time favorite. The frenetic style and grainy cinematography really compliment the premise and tone perfectly IMO. One of the most thrilling, "badass" and yet simultaneously terrifying films ever made IMO. The intensity of the combat even outdoes Platoon (which followed in theaters a couple months later) in some areas.
In my head canon there were probably some internal Company politics at play immediately after the events of the first film that prevented them from exploring LV-426 further. Heads probably rolled after the Nostromo fiasco, maybe some higher ups lost their jobs, "had accidents," etc., and those that succeeded them had pet projects on other planets that they diverted resources to or what have you.
I too think that the theatrical cut is the superior film (though I actually quite like Hicks and Ripley exchanging first names.) It's smoother and more polished and like you said the marines' arrival on LV-426 is even more suspenseful without any context at all regarding what they're walking into. And while I think the Sentry guns are definitely "cool" they also give the survivors a measurable safety net of defense. In the theatrical cut there's *nothing* between them and the monsters save for a couple of hastily welded doors. Much more tense that way.
Remember this is 50 years after the evens of ALIEN.. I am sure that most of the evil company men were gone..
I imagine that in the future the wealthy will live very, very long lives. Living now to 100 is not unheard of. Its quite possible that 'company men' live into their 150s easy... or perhaps can even download their consciousness into new bodies.
Why does he hate horror movies?
And is someone who hates that type of thing the best judge of it?
I think I'd like to know what your daughter thinks.
Can someone explain this for me?
The company doesn't believe Ripley in Aliens, saying she's crazy and she loses her pilot license. Yet when they lose contact with the colony, suddenly they believe her and need her to go in with the marines. I get that they're slimy lying pricks and send Burke with her, but the briefing scene with Ripley doesn't make sense if they're basically admitting the aliens exist a minute later when Gorman and Burke pop over.
There's a lot of nuance in their characterisation, a lot of understated depth, whereas Cameron's characters are more generic.
That's exactly what I meant, and the largest difference between the two movies.
Alien is very nuanced, so much so it takes multiple viewings to catch all the subtleties between characters. With Cameron, as always, his character traits are in your face, their relationships blatantly stated from line one. Nuance is not something Cameron relishes in. Which I believe is the core reason I view Alien as being closer to art and Aliens as closer to popcorn.
ALIEN is a masterpiece of Cinema
ALIENS is a great ****ing movie.
That's exactly what I meant, and the largest difference between the two movies.
Alien is very nuanced, so much so it takes multiple viewings to catch all the subtleties between characters. With Cameron, as always, his character traits are in your face, their relationships blatantly stated from line one. Nuance is not something Cameron relishes in. Which I believe is the core reason I view Alien as being closer to art and Aliens as closer to popcorn.
ALIEN is a masterpiece of Cinema
ALIENS is a great ****ing movie.
ALIEN is a masterpiece of Cinema
ALIENS is a great ****ing movie.
ALIEN is a masterpiece of Cinema
ALIENS is a great ****ing movie.
Enter your email address to join: