I wasn't joking though, great scene.
I want a figure of younger Carl the T-800. The first bad-guy Terminator who succeeds in his mission.
Last edited:
I can't help but imagine an alternate 1991 where the original T2 ended with *that* scene after cutting away from that dark highway at night.
Full scene
I had read the spoilers, I knew what took place - I thought I would only hate it because I hated the very theoretical idea of it. But actually seeing it, a certain appreciation crept in
for their depiction of a true T-800 Terminator however briefly that will be. The horror of it.
In light of my confused and conflicted reaction to that scene I should withhold further criticism until I see the whole film. But don't be surprised if I'm still chipping away at it in the meantime as other reviews and opinions come up.
Carl should have been wearing shorts and sandals.
That actually would?ve made it even more disturbing and horrifying.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Just erase the whole movie and insert that as a dream sequence in T2 and call it a day.
That actually would?ve made it even more disturbing and horrifying.
The now infamous intro scene.
It took Carl 10 seconds to do whatthe T 1000 couldn't do in a whole film. T 1000 sucks now. Carl didn't even wear a disguise, same flat top haircut and sunglasses too.
Yep I agree. And by all accounts this might still be the crappy, forgettable, "non-canon," woke, etc., film that we've been writing it off as being from the beginning.
And yet...I'd be lying if I said that that clip doesn't imply a premise that I would have been on board with since 1991.
I mean if I divorce the premise from Cameron's own complaints about the opening of Alien 3, his complaints about the repetition of TFA, gratuitous passing the torch to females of the current year, Tim Miller's idiotic comments about misogyny and so on and take it *only* as the in-universe continuation of T2 well then let's see here it:
1. Shifts the tone of the entire franchise right back to its original sci-fi/horror roots.
2. Portrays Skynet in a tactically sound and systematic way.
3. Showcases an aging Arnold and Linda in a shockingly flattering light.
I mean really just string some decent action sequences around those three elements above and you've got a recipe for a perfectly valid entry in the series. And focusing for a second on #2 above the opening of DF really makes perfect sense. Why wouldn't Skynet send as many Terminators back through time as it could? Reese was wrong about it being "just him, and me." So now we see what a tragic mistake it was for Sarah to assume that "Skynet sent two Terminators back through time." And if Skynet sends a bunch of Terminators (which would be a logically sound tactic) then well, it does kind of *legitimately* lend itself to a bit of "Groundhog Day" repetition over the course of however many years.
And if we can accept that approach when it's done well in Edge of Tomorrow well why not Terminator. Skynet could have even sent some sleeper Terminators with the sole mission of *not* assassinating anyone and instead offering themselves, and more specifically their CPU's, up to Cyberdyne or whoever else to research to greater ensure it's own "birth."
"There's one more chip, and it must be destroyed as well." Another tragic mistake. There could be dozens of chips appearing out of thin air when all is said and done. How horrible for Sarah to live with the fact that she willingly lowered Uncle Bob into the steel when he could have been *so* useful just a few short days later.
As I said this could still be a total woke or blandly repetitive **** show but damn, from what I'm seeing as far as the premise is concerned this sucker could actually win me over.
Just erase the whole movie and insert that as a dream sequence in T2 and call it a day.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Enter your email address to join: