Niltusk
Super Freak
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2011
- Messages
- 12,599
- Reaction score
- 50
My own feeling is that an insult toward a film is not an insult toward me. Similarly, a criticism to a feeling I hold toward a film ("i.e., that Ghost Rider was a fantastic movie, and I just don't get how everyone doesn't agree with me!"), is not an insult toward me. I didn't make these films, and I don't have to defend them in the way I would a friend or family member. However, an insult toward me, or people like me (however they are conceptualized) IS an insult to me. So when folks talk about "whiners" as Niltusk brings up, or more explicitly says something like "you are displaying your stupidity here," or then that's a problem. You don't even have to say "whiners like you," if it is obvious that others posting would be included in that group.
To me, this is fairly straight-forward, and at the essence of what is meant by civil discourse. None of us are perfect, and we all take jabs at others here in one way or another from time to time. But it does get out of hand sometimes, and once there is a heated conflict between members that might be a good time to question whether all the argumentation is worth it, when folks aren't going to change opinions, and even reality and hard evidence mean very little once these squabbles escalate to a certain point. It's just perpetuating a cycle.
Thats basically what I was wondering. There are things that get a pass, so you would assume, thats part of the lay of the land, but then you see pretty much the same situation and it gets erased/infracted/etc... it gets confusing as to what the boundaries are.
I know we "should" use common sense, but when arguing, sometimes its hard to stop and think okay, am i crossing a line that I can't return from.