The Amazing Spider-Man - OPEN SPOILERS NOW
- Thread starter The Mike
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 32,452
- Reaction score
- 3,157
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
Exactly what I thought.
"Woah, that's a bad out FIT. WOOO" - Metropolis Black Pimp
....
Exactly what I thought.
"Woah, that's a bad out FIT. WOOO" - Metropolis Black Pimp
wHySoSeRiOuS203
Super Freak
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
atleast there was no "flexing at self in mirror" screne
atleast there was no "flexing at self in mirror" screne
jye4ever
Broke and happy
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
Difabio and Zach are right you know, Spidey 1 and 2 were (and still are) universally considered as very well made Superhero movies.
It's also universally understood that 3 is knowhere as close to the quality of 1 and 2.
So yes, while we are all entitled to our own opinions, comprehending what is universally understood by most of your peers is equally important when one chooses to make public their opinions.
If I come out and say that Batman needs to be rebooted after Nolan is finished with them for reasons 1,2 and 3, I will make such statement knowing very well that BB and TDK are considered triple A quality filmaking, that just so happened to be Superhero movies, yet had run their course because the director felt he had told his story as best he could and it was time to give someone else a chance at telling their version of Batman.
So yeah, I agree with you, i'm up for a Spidey reboot
Difabio and Zach are right you know, Spidey 1 and 2 were (and still are) universally considered as very well made Superhero movies.
It's also universally understood that 3 is knowhere as close to the quality of 1 and 2.
So yes, while we are all entitled to our own opinions, comprehending what is universally understood by most of your peers is equally important when one chooses to make public their opinions.
If I come out and say that Batman needs to be rebooted after Nolan is finished with them for reasons 1,2 and 3, I will make such statement knowing very well that BB and TDK are considered triple A quality filmaking, that just so happened to be Superhero movies, yet had run their course because the director felt he had told his story as best he could and it was time to give someone else a chance at telling their version of Batman.
So yeah, I agree with you, i'm up for a Spidey reboot
Last edited:
Reinhardt
Super Freak
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
I think the confusion may be on your comment about liking darker films, and then giving Superman 1&2 as an example. Superman 1 was anything but dark.
nevermind
I think the confusion may be on your comment about liking darker films, and then giving Superman 1&2 as an example. Superman 1 was anything but dark.
jye4ever
Broke and happy
ToastedFred
Super Freak
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
The POV shot at the end was good in my opinion, but it reminded me far too much of the Mirror's Edge game. It looked exactly like it but with Spider-Man instead of Faith.
The POV shot at the end was good in my opinion, but it reminded me far too much of the Mirror's Edge game. It looked exactly like it but with Spider-Man instead of Faith.
The Ringer
Super Freak
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
Tobey>Twilight
Tobey>Twilight
- Joined
- May 31, 2011
- Messages
- 19,881
- Reaction score
- 288
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
It's probably the last shot of the movie before the credits role a la SM1
It's probably the last shot of the movie before the credits role a la SM1
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2008
- Messages
- 28,366
- Reaction score
- 4,845
ToastedFred
Super Freak
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
Either way, it was very Mirror's Edge-y.
Either way, it was very Mirror's Edge-y.
morphosis
Super Freak
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2010
- Messages
- 1,995
- Reaction score
- 24
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
ok yah, sorry for the confusion i didnt mean Superman #1 & 2 were dark (although #2 has some darker elements to them), in my comments i said a more "realistic approach" which is what i meant referring to Superman #1 & 2. those Superman worlds had a lot of realism to them especially at the time they came out starting in the late 70s.
and i was writing quickly so i left out some words, so what i meant to say is that I like darker movies, and I like a more realistic approach to Comic Book movies like Nolan has done with Batman....
now yes, Spidey 1&2 were definitely by far better than #3. and they are atleast entertaining movies that you can atleast watch unlike say the Schumacher Batman's which are painful to watch.
But i just wasnt a huge fan of them as i was hoping to be. i dont think the stories were compelling enough. Just didnt believe in the actors enough, they all seemed really cold to me.
ill admit i overstated my dislike for them by comparing them to Schumachers Batman's. But i think they now have a chance to do a more compelling story, more character driven, with some better acting, and a little less CGI with the new Reboot.
ok yah, sorry for the confusion i didnt mean Superman #1 & 2 were dark (although #2 has some darker elements to them), in my comments i said a more "realistic approach" which is what i meant referring to Superman #1 & 2. those Superman worlds had a lot of realism to them especially at the time they came out starting in the late 70s.
and i was writing quickly so i left out some words, so what i meant to say is that I like darker movies, and I like a more realistic approach to Comic Book movies like Nolan has done with Batman....
now yes, Spidey 1&2 were definitely by far better than #3. and they are atleast entertaining movies that you can atleast watch unlike say the Schumacher Batman's which are painful to watch.
But i just wasnt a huge fan of them as i was hoping to be. i dont think the stories were compelling enough. Just didnt believe in the actors enough, they all seemed really cold to me.
ill admit i overstated my dislike for them by comparing them to Schumachers Batman's. But i think they now have a chance to do a more compelling story, more character driven, with some better acting, and a little less CGI with the new Reboot.
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2008
- Messages
- 28,366
- Reaction score
- 4,845
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
Is that a bad thing though?
Just because it is similar does not mean it is not excellent. I loved it.
Is that a bad thing though?
Just because it is similar does not mean it is not excellent. I loved it.
- Joined
- May 31, 2011
- Messages
- 19,881
- Reaction score
- 288
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
Yup. One of the two. Pretty cool IMO though. Wouldn't want them to do it throughout the movie though.
Yup. One of the two. Pretty cool IMO though. Wouldn't want them to do it throughout the movie though.
ToastedFred
Super Freak
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
I didn't say it was bad thing, I really liked that sequence myself. I was just saying how it was very similar to the game.
I didn't say it was bad thing, I really liked that sequence myself. I was just saying how it was very similar to the game.
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2008
- Messages
- 28,366
- Reaction score
- 4,845
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
Oh fairplay.
Just seemed a few people were so quick to slate it because it is derivitave when most things are these days anyway.
Oh fairplay.
Just seemed a few people were so quick to slate it because it is derivitave when most things are these days anyway.
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2008
- Messages
- 35,160
- Reaction score
- 2
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
Spider-Man isnt a dark character....is he?
I'll just watch the first movie over and over.
Spider-Man isnt a dark character....is he?
I'll just watch the first movie over and over.
wHySoSeRiOuS203
Super Freak
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
Ash Housewares
Super Freak
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
Lol. On it's own it's hilarious. In context of the film it is not !
Lol. On it's own it's hilarious. In context of the film it is not !
Similar threads
