Oscar_the_Gungan
Super Freak
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2008
- Messages
- 765
- Reaction score
- 0
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
While I'm not super enthused yet. I do have to admit that Garfield and Stone seem much more engaging than Maguire and Dunst. I really didn't like Dunst as Mary Jane but I think it probably had more to do with the writing than her acting. She was too much of a sad sack. I also got fed up with how she got captured and needed to be rescued at the end of every movie. It got pretty repetitive.
Emma Stone's Gwen Stacy seems more to make more sense to me then Bryce Dallas Howard did but again it probably had more to do with the writing than her acting.
I think if they had waited a few more years to reboot I would have been more excited.
I really wish Spider-Man 3 had been two movies with the third focusing on the Sandman story and a fourth film dealing with Venom and resolving the Harry Osborn stuff.
While I'm not super enthused yet. I do have to admit that Garfield and Stone seem much more engaging than Maguire and Dunst. I really didn't like Dunst as Mary Jane but I think it probably had more to do with the writing than her acting. She was too much of a sad sack. I also got fed up with how she got captured and needed to be rescued at the end of every movie. It got pretty repetitive.
Emma Stone's Gwen Stacy seems more to make more sense to me then Bryce Dallas Howard did but again it probably had more to do with the writing than her acting.
I think if they had waited a few more years to reboot I would have been more excited.
I really wish Spider-Man 3 had been two movies with the third focusing on the Sandman story and a fourth film dealing with Venom and resolving the Harry Osborn stuff.