The Batman (June 25, 2021)

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Re: The Batman film directed by Matt Reeves...again

Best part was getting a glimpse of Amy Adams side **** in the tub.
 
Re: The Batman film directed by Matt Reeves...again

Best part was getting a glimpse of Amy Adams side **** in the tub.

Which was followed by Clark "Dumb as ****ing Bricks" Kent getting inside the bathtub with his shoes. He could've stepped on gum, ****, puke and cocaine for all we know! But nah, he's getting inside the bath while Lois is naked. And they're gonna have sex in that water. I guess she likes dirt particles inside of her ******...

Of all the problems that movie had, that's still the most disgusting scene...
 
Re: The Batman film directed by Matt Reeves...again

I know folks consider Snyder a "visual" director, but I can't think of a single iconic image or scene in his DC films. At least something that wasn't copied directly from a Watchmen or Dark Knight Returns comic. Strange.
 
Re: The Batman film directed by Matt Reeves...again

I know folks consider Snyder a "visual" director, but I can't think of a single iconic image or scene in his DC films. At least something that wasn't copied directly from a Watchmen or Dark Knight Returns comic. Strange.

I can remember 300 and The Watchmen but nothing else
 
Re: The Batman film directed by Matt Reeves...again

I know folks consider Snyder a "visual" director, but I can't think of a single iconic image or scene in his DC films. At least something that wasn't copied directly from a Watchmen or Dark Knight Returns comic. Strange.

I thought the Knightmare sequence looked pretty kool.

As far as iconic imagery, I'd say the scene showing Superman during various resues (pulling the ship, carrying the shuttle, etc) looked great.

There are a couple things that weren't taken from DKR. I noticed this shot taken from The Adventures of Superman:

71rGPCJNRRL.jpg

o-BATMAN-V-SUPERMAN-facebook.jpg
 
Last edited:
Re: The Batman film directed by Matt Reeves...again

getting inside the bathtub with his shoes. He could've stepped on gum, ****, puke and cocaine for all we know! But nah, he's getting inside the bath while Lois is naked. And they're gonna have sex in that water. I guess she likes dirt particles inside of her ******...


Kostis doesn't **** his old lady in public restrooms or in nasty alley ways, everyone point at him and laugh!

*****es love spontaneity. They're just as depraved as us. You don't even want to know what they stick up in there when nobody is looking. Lois? She just wanted that D, she ain't gonna care about no shoes. In fact, it was probably hotter for her having them on.
 
Re: The Batman film directed by Matt Reeves...again

Kostis doesn't **** his old lady in public restrooms or in nasty alley ways, everyone point at him and laugh!

I, uh, get so much puss-ay-ay that I ain't got the energy to have spontaneous ****s. I'm, uh, a, rough guy like that. Triple A Class ΑΛΦΑ Dawg. Hood Wolves ain't got nothin' on me.

*****es love spontaneity. They're just as depraved as us. You don't even want to know what they stick up in there when nobody is looking. Lois? She just wanted that D, she ain't gonna care about no shoes. In fact, it was probably hotter for her having them on.

Yeah, but, can she handle the D?

65e4698935f97c0155a482856d492c77.jpg

It's why Supers works better with other Supers. The combination of various super-powers would make for a great "time". :naughty
 
Re: The Batman film directed by Matt Reeves...again


I wonder how surprised Gadot was after taking direction on an all green set to "pretend you're about to be taken by the man of your dreams" only to see the finished film and learn that they animated an entire battlefield around her complete with giant troll instead of a honeymoon suite.
 
Re: The Batman film directed by Matt Reeves...again

I can remember 300 and The Watchmen but nothing else
Considering 300 was his attempt at a shot-for-shot recreation of the comic, I'm not sure that one says much about the guy. Good for what it was though, I guess. . .



im not marvel lover or defender but i think people were eased into their universe little by little. we were given small bites of the pie. the build up was interesting enough to keep watching.
sure they are family friendly pop corn movies but they took their time. each movie feels like chapters of a book, a big book. people might give them a pass now because the journey was not as abrupt. even if some marvel movies suck, the overall journey is pretty much smooth.

there truly is no reason to have batman versus superman at all, it wasnt earned. it doesnt make sense story wise or thematically. having batman versus superman right after man of steel feels like middle school fan fiction. we barely just met this superman guy, he barely just had a fight. batman needed a less messy intro.
the batman and flash cameos on suicide squad are forced. suicide squad story makes no sense when wonder woman and batman exist in that universe. where were they? now we go back in time to see wonder woman....
the dc universe feels like chapters of different books together. feels like the messiest collage of books.

as family friendly and safe as marvel is at least they never created that many bumps in their road. it still feels like reading one big single book. dc universe as it is feels like reading 3 different magazines at once
Back when this movie approach was first suggested by WB, on this very forum I posted two things: 1) I think an approach where you drop right in the middle definitely could work, and could be a really interesting way of handling a comic film or franchise; and 2) I thought WB would **** it up big time. I stick to both of these thoughts. The problem wasn't a strategic decision to jump right into the fray. It was to have boneheads in the creative department mucking it up that screwed everything up. Off the top of my head, look at the Young Justice cartoon series. You have this team forming into a very well established "universe" that we haven't seen set up from step one. And it was pretty damn awesome.

That was the best part of the whole movie :lol

Naw, best was Batman hitting Superman with a sink!!

You're all wrong. The best part was the jar of piss. Much symbolism. Such smartness. W(orld)o(f)W(arcraft).

best was superman killing that dude in africa using a wall

Best part was getting a glimpse of Amy Adams side **** in the tub.

Nah, it was the most iconic line in modern film:



Ironically, Khev believes the Adams tub scene was the worst part of the movie!

I wonder how surprised Gadot was after taking direction on an all green set to "pretend you're about to be taken by the man of your dreams" only to see the finished film and learn that they animated an entire battlefield around her complete with giant troll instead of a honeymoon suite.
Like when the producer of her record asked Donna Summer to pleasure herself in the studio, recorded it, and inserted it into one of her songs. I wonder if she fully knew what was going on, and if he had to really cajole her into it or what? :lol
 
Re: The Batman film directed by Matt Reeves...again

Everything with Eisenberg was the worst part.

i really really really really, really reaaaally wonder what the hell was Snyder even thinking. i just cannot understand that kind of reasoning of giving him a role that important. it just makes no sense.
Even if he wanted a young Luthor, it just doesnt add up. doesnt make any logical sense
 
Re: The Batman film directed by Matt Reeves...again

i really really really really, really reaaaally wonder what the hell was Snyder even thinking. i just cannot understand that kind of reasoning of giving him a role that important. it just makes no sense.
Even if he wanted a young Luthor, it just doesnt add up. doesnt make any logical sense
It seemed pretty obvious that his idea was to have a young tech billionaire as the bad guy. . .and in Snyder's mind, this is what those weird girly men look and act like I guess :lol
 
Re: The Batman film directed by Matt Reeves...again

It seemed pretty obvious that his idea was to have a young tech billionaire as the bad guy. . .and in Snyder's mind, this is what those weird girly men look and act like I guess :lol

You can't expect an ΑΛΦΑ Top Dawg with a huge-ass Pipe, who grinds all day and all night, to know how ΒΗΤΑ's live their pitiful lives. Pumping Iron's the most importanter thing!
 
Re: The Batman film directed by Matt Reeves...again

Everything with Eisenberg was the worst part.

I blame Snyder.

I just saw Hacksaw Ridge, and crazy Mel did the impossible, he made the charisma vacuum, Sam Worthington really good. Even Vince Vaughn was great.

Give Eisenberg to Mel Gibson, and Mel would some how get a great performance out of that little Jewish boy. :lol

Mel would probably take Eisenberg to an acting camp, shave his head, and get him ready to play Luthor perfectly.
 
Re: The Batman film directed by Matt Reeves...again

I blame Snyder.

I just saw Hacksaw Ridge, and crazy Mel did the impossible, he made the charisma vacuum, Sam Worthington really good. Even Vince Vaughn was great.

Give Eisenberg to Mel Gibson, and Mel would some how get a great performance out of that little Jewish boy. :lol

Eisenberg's good already, so with a capable director, he could very well be a good classic Luthor. Or, he could at least pull off the "ha-ha, I'm Lex Luthor in the body of my supposed son and I'm also ****ing Supergirl and have weird facial hair" Luthor...
 
Re: The Batman film directed by Matt Reeves...again

I blame Snyder.

I just saw Hacksaw Ridge, and crazy Mel did the impossible, he made the charisma vacuum, Sam Worthington really good. Even Vince Vaughn was great.

Give Eisenberg to Mel Gibson, and Mel would some how get a great performance out of that little Jewish boy. :lol

Mel would probably take Eisenberg to an acting camp, shave his head, and get him ready to play Luthor perfectly.

stewie-head-turn.gif
 
Back
Top