That's not true though.
What's comic accurate? A Ra's Al Ghul trained Bruce? Joe Chill getting murdered by a hit chick? An all black suit? Rachel Dawes? A paint wearing Joker? Two-Face dying a few days after becoming Two-Face? Mayor Garcia?
None of those things are comic accurate (whatever that is) and they're all in Begins and TDK, and I love those two films. Especially the ****ing Joker which is probably my favorite aspect of what Nolan has done.
My critiques, while I might have some faults with "accuracy" (like Bruce being Batman for less than a year) are completely based on the films faults on their own, not comic accuracy.
I don't like Bane, not because he doesn't have venom or can't roid up but because he sucks. He's written poorly and is cliched in my opinion. Look at those critiques up there where I criticize SCRIPT cliches and faults. That has nothing to do with comic accuracy.
I like the world that Nolan set up with Begins, I liked the heightened reality of TDK, TDKR just blew that all straight to hell in my opinion. It wasn't that it wasn't comic accurate, it was that it didn't follow the rules that previous stories set . . . for me. Big, grandois, Transformer "epicness". Nuclear bombs, cliched plot twists, "threequel" problems of contradicting or adding to things that weren't in the previous films. Characters completely changing from crying Alfred, to bloated "huh, Bruce Wayne is Batman" Gordon, to even Batman himself.
Those are my main gripes. Not, "ohhhh, THEY PRONOUNCED RA'S WRONG", "BLAKE DIDN'T WEAR A RED AND GREEN SUIT", "BANE HAZ NO VENOMZ".
You like Adolfo, and that's fine. I don't, other don't and it's not out of some perceived "comic accuracy", some just DON'T LIKE IT.