hunnipot85
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2008
- Messages
- 6,399
- Reaction score
- 27
Re: Batman/Dark Knight 3rd Film
Anybody else hoping the Emily Blunt rumors are true?
Anybody else hoping the Emily Blunt rumors are true?
Anybody else hoping the Emily Blunt rumors are true?
If it is actual footage that didn't make the cut, (highly unlikely), that's a hell of a lot of unused material for Nolan.
what rumors? whats the skinny girl!?!
He has to choose wisely to keep the relatively "real world" feel that he has so carefully created for his films. I can think of a ton of Batman villains that would not work in a Nolan movie, and not very many that would.
Although it could be made to work, I kind of hope that he doesn't use Catwoman in the third film. (Or Penguin--who probably couldn't be made to work.).
Penguin would be easier to fit into the Nolan-verse than Riddler, since he could just be a portly gangster. Riddler has to use riddles for some purpose or another, which is inherently goofy. To work in the Nolan-verse, I think Riddler would have to be pretty significantly different from the comic/cartoon versions. Different name, different MO. Just a smart guy who likes to create puzzles for Batman to solve or something.
Pretty much. That's why I don't think it would work. He would have to be so different as to not be recognizable.So, completely different character altogether?
The problem is, the Riddler was, in revisionist Batman history, a guy with some major psychological problems. But he was never a sociopath like the Joker. He isn't a serial killer, or a sadistic torturer. He's a guy who enjoys using riddles to befuddle Batman. If you make him a serial killer or a mass murderer of some kind, then you really aren't doing Riddler. Maybe more recent Batman comics have changed this about the character, but I doubt it.I think the Riddler would work in Nolan's universe. In much the same way that the Joker went from Romero's clowning buffoon to Ledger's anarchistic self-mutilating psychopath, the Riddler can change from the Gorshin and Carrey portrayals into something more akin to the Zodiac Killer or even "John Doe" from Seven. Make him a truly dark and threatening force, and his "riddles"/clues can take a cue from Seven and really showcase Batman's detective abilities--the final element from the comics that has yet to be truly showcased (Dark Knight did this in a more limited manner).
The problem is, the Riddler was, in revisionist Batman history, a guy with some major psychological problems. But he was never a sociopath like the Joker. He isn't a serial killer, or a sadistic torturer. He's a guy who enjoys using riddles to befuddle Batman. If you make him a serial killer or a mass murderer of some kind, then you really aren't doing Riddler. Maybe more recent Batman comics have changed this about the character, but I doubt it.
Nolan could use a guy who acts like the old Riddler, and just treat him as disturbed with a wacky riddle obsession. But who could take this kind of character seriously in a "realistic" Batman-verse? How could he provide a serious threat? To do that, you most likely have to create a character that is not Riddler, IMO. I'll be the first to admit it if Nolan proves me wrong, though.
I think both the penguin and riddler would work well in Nolanland. I mean how long did you picture Nocholson's Joker when the topic was brought up? Then Ledger comes along (In Nolanland) and makes believers out of everyone. I really think either character will work and work well. Its the film maker that brings the yay or nay. Just picture the riddler even darker than Ledger's Joker ........... more twisted and clever.
This is true, but part of being so good is his knowing what not to do.Exactly. After seeing what Nolan has done there's no doubt that whoever he brings in will work. The dude knows what he's doing, he's proved that.
Enter your email address to join: