- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 32,452
- Reaction score
- 3,156
Re: Batman/Dark Knight 3rd Film
I thought the Joker broke his own neck to frame Batman?
I thought the Joker broke his own neck to frame Batman?
The Dark Knight Rises ***USE SPOILER TAGS***
- Thread starter pjam
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
- Status
Re: Batman/Dark Knight 3rd Film
that's the only story where batman ever killed the joker
that's the only story where batman ever killed the joker
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 32,452
- Reaction score
- 3,156
Re: Batman/Dark Knight 3rd Film
So he didn't? Which is it?
Batman has killed in other comics too. I don't know what's considered canon or what have you but I found a pretty cool article about it after doing some searches,
https://www.comicsalliance.com/2010/03/22/batman-kills-murderer/
Keep in mind, I'm not saying I prefer him taking lives or anything like that. I'm just arguing there are multiple versions of Batman. Yeah, we might think some are stupid and we might not like it but they're all valid to Batman lore. Without one we might not even have the one we enjoy since they evolve and build off each other.
I can enjoy a code honoring Batman and a killing one. Who cares? No need to get serious and defensive about it.
So he didn't? Which is it?
Batman has killed in other comics too. I don't know what's considered canon or what have you but I found a pretty cool article about it after doing some searches,
https://www.comicsalliance.com/2010/03/22/batman-kills-murderer/
Keep in mind, I'm not saying I prefer him taking lives or anything like that. I'm just arguing there are multiple versions of Batman. Yeah, we might think some are stupid and we might not like it but they're all valid to Batman lore. Without one we might not even have the one we enjoy since they evolve and build off each other.
I can enjoy a code honoring Batman and a killing one. Who cares? No need to get serious and defensive about it.
Re: Batman/Dark Knight 3rd Film
You guys all need to. . .CHILL
. . .but yeah, Batman killing folks is ridikulus.
You guys all need to. . .CHILL
. . .but yeah, Batman killing folks is ridikulus.
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 32,452
- Reaction score
- 3,156
Re: Batman/Dark Knight 3rd Film
<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="https://www.youtube.com/v/6yAfajTt9x8?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="https://www.youtube.com/v/6yAfajTt9x8?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>
<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="https://www.youtube.com/v/6yAfajTt9x8?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="https://www.youtube.com/v/6yAfajTt9x8?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>
devilof76
Super Freak
Re: Batman/Dark Knight 3rd Film
An open mind is empty. Stick your thumb in that and smoke it.
An open mind is empty. Stick your thumb in that and smoke it.
Last edited:
SnakeDoctor
Super Freak
Re: Batman/Dark Knight 3rd Film
If I recall correctly, Chill got taken out by a mob hit before Wayne could shoot him.
SnakeDoc
If I recall correctly, Chill got taken out by a mob hit before Wayne could shoot him.
SnakeDoc
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 32,452
- Reaction score
- 3,156
Re: Batman/Dark Knight 3rd Film
I said about to. Of course Wayne didn't kill him. If the hit woman didn't though, Bruce would have shot him.
I said about to. Of course Wayne didn't kill him. If the hit woman didn't though, Bruce would have shot him.
hairlesswookiee
PALPATINE CRUSADER!!!!
Re: Batman/Dark Knight 3rd Film
So glad to finally hear progress in this movie. I'm on the fence about the name, but I also didn't like the "Begins" moniker at first either. Regardless, I'm not going to avoid the movie because I don't like the title.
~~As for the Black Mask...I'm cool with it. Keeps the ongoing gang theme with the other movies.
So glad to finally hear progress in this movie. I'm on the fence about the name, but I also didn't like the "Begins" moniker at first either. Regardless, I'm not going to avoid the movie because I don't like the title.
~~As for the Black Mask...I'm cool with it. Keeps the ongoing gang theme with the other movies.
Ktjn
Super Freak
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2006
- Messages
- 4,636
- Reaction score
- 2
Re: Batman/Dark Knight 3rd Film
Glad we got some new information on the movie. The title is fine, it represents what the movie will be about in my opinion (Batman's redemption).
Really hope we get a scene of Heath at some point (preferably at Arkam Asylum).
I am also very happy that Nolan has decided to go with IMAX again, and not 3D.
Between this and The Hobbit, I have a couple movies to look forward too again.
Glad we got some new information on the movie. The title is fine, it represents what the movie will be about in my opinion (Batman's redemption).
Really hope we get a scene of Heath at some point (preferably at Arkam Asylum).
I am also very happy that Nolan has decided to go with IMAX again, and not 3D.
Between this and The Hobbit, I have a couple movies to look forward too again.
Re: Batman/Dark Knight 3rd Film
Dark Knight Returns was pre-Elseworlds Elseworlds. Irrelevant what happened there. No different than the Schumacher-verse.
AsGoodAsIt_Gittes
Super Freak
Re: Batman/Dark Knight 3rd Film
Yeah, in those movies, Batman liked to bully people with disabilities. First he used his bat grapple to bring a dude with bleached skin "down to his level", and then he picked on a 4ft penguin with no hands, not to mention he hit a woman (he's a woman beater, too!?)...I guess that Michael Keaton was not so heroic after all, when you look back and think of all the "heroic things he's done". Maybe that's why he dropped out of Batman Forever when he found out he'd in-directly kill, Harvey Two Face, and have The Riddler committed. Just wasn't enough fun for him, he wanted a killing spree!!
Yeah, in those movies, Batman liked to bully people with disabilities. First he used his bat grapple to bring a dude with bleached skin "down to his level", and then he picked on a 4ft penguin with no hands, not to mention he hit a woman (he's a woman beater, too!?)...I guess that Michael Keaton was not so heroic after all, when you look back and think of all the "heroic things he's done". Maybe that's why he dropped out of Batman Forever when he found out he'd in-directly kill, Harvey Two Face, and have The Riddler committed. Just wasn't enough fun for him, he wanted a killing spree!!
monkeyrobotmaster
Super Freak
Re: Batman/Dark Knight 3rd Film
Burtons Batman was mainly revenge based, Schumacher's Batman was based on a retarded acid trip. Where as Nolan's Batman is based on doing the greater good. He didn't kill Ras because it was Ras' actions that lead to the ended of his life. As for Ras coming back, if they went that route, it would be someone new who's taken the name of Ras. That was set up in 'Begins' when Neeson says Ras is just a name. As for Two Face both Chris Nolan and his Brother have stated in interviews that he's dead. Now for the new film, since Nolan has ruled out a few of the other well known villains my guess would be Blackmask, Deadshot, Firefly, and Catwoman. The four of them are the only other known/ semi-known villains left in his main rouges gallery that could fit into Nolan's "reality" based universe. Plus I wouldn't be surprised if it was at least three of them seeing as how each film has had more then one villain.
Here's a link to check out all of Batman's villains. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batman_villains
Burtons Batman was mainly revenge based, Schumacher's Batman was based on a retarded acid trip. Where as Nolan's Batman is based on doing the greater good. He didn't kill Ras because it was Ras' actions that lead to the ended of his life. As for Ras coming back, if they went that route, it would be someone new who's taken the name of Ras. That was set up in 'Begins' when Neeson says Ras is just a name. As for Two Face both Chris Nolan and his Brother have stated in interviews that he's dead. Now for the new film, since Nolan has ruled out a few of the other well known villains my guess would be Blackmask, Deadshot, Firefly, and Catwoman. The four of them are the only other known/ semi-known villains left in his main rouges gallery that could fit into Nolan's "reality" based universe. Plus I wouldn't be surprised if it was at least three of them seeing as how each film has had more then one villain.
Here's a link to check out all of Batman's villains. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batman_villains
Last edited:
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
