The Dark Knight Rises ***USE SPOILER TAGS***

[thenammagazine]

Re: The Dark Knight Rises

 

[crows]

Re: The Dark Knight Rises

You posted your opinion, don't get mad about it now. Just sayin'

what I was saying is that I was answering to WurstCollector post, so you should have quote him and not me, lol,

 

[K07]

Re: The Dark Knight Rises

Batman Reboot Routes???

• A new trilogy with Batman established, revolving around the Birth, prime, and end of Robin (into Nightwing).

• 
  
  While we already saw a Robin origin in BF, I would not be against this. It's what I was hoping to see after TDKR if it wasn't being rebooted. It needs to have less of a homoerotic relationship and more of one of father and son.

 

[lambo944]

Re: The Dark Knight Rises

 

[jye4ever]

Re: The Dark Knight Rises

/\ void immediately after TDKR or me after Avengers.

 

[lambo944]

Re: The Dark Knight Rises

This is void after TDKR

 

[Wor-Gar]

Re: The Dark Knight Rises

^^^^^

 

[jye4ever]

Re: The Dark Knight Rises

That's void now just with the trailer.

 

[crows]

Re: The Dark Knight Rises

I really dont want to see robin again, and i dont want to see batman's parents dying again, I hope they realize Nolan did the best job at that with Begins, and the new reboot is not a beginning story again

 

[Wor-Gar]

Re: The Dark Knight Rises

they should go with the court of owls cuz they're quite freaky....

 

[lambo944]

Re: The Dark Knight Rises

That's void now just with the trailer.

 

[crows]

Re: The Dark Knight Rises

in ancient times crying was very manly, because in ancient Greek culture, men were expected to cry if their family's honor was at stake. One of the greatest signs of true manliness was to shed tears, medieval heroes and even Beowulf himself cried like babies throughout their adventures

 

[Wor-Gar]

Re: The Dark Knight Rises

 

[K07]

Re: The Dark Knight Rises

Hey, even Jesus wept! That was over the death of a friend. That's the same as a trailer, right?

 

[The Mike]

Re: The Dark Knight Rises

From the beginning, Nolan intended to build a universe where Batman is the only costumed hero. He didn't want to tell a good Batman story that could also be a jump-off for a Justice League story. He intended to tell a good Batman story. Period.

Which is amazingly shortsighted and removes one of the key aspects of the character itself. Batman was always the man amongst Gods who could not only hold his own amongst them but beat them and to have him exist in a vacuum and not even reveal that portion of the character's history and being really always bugged me. You didn't have to have a cameo in every flick or stockpile DC characters in his films but at least an acknowledgment of a greater universe or even an off-hand remark about "dealing with the Kryptonian's problems" or "helping the yahoo with the ring" would go miles to establish it instead of Nolan simply wanting to paint in one color.

As for the jump-off point, I guarantee you he could have easily made his films but left the door open for Batman to be amongst others when he was done, it was a conscious choice to do Batman alone and he even told and said he'd help reboot another Batman who could be in a film DCU because of it. Who is to say that a Nolan story couldn't have set the tone for the rest of the DCU? Instead we're getting something that is bottlenecking the rest of the universe because we have to wait until 2014 to get things going (if recent rumors are true and Cavill's Superman will be vacuumed like Nolan originally stated)

 

[snoop101]

Re: The Dark Knight Rises

I'm liking this movie more and more as I repeatedly watch the trailer. My initial thoughts were quite negative.

Batman Reboot Routes???

• A new trilogy with Batman established, revolving around the Birth, prime, and end of Robin (into Nightwing).
  
• Based off New 52 and begins with The Court of Owls
  
• Combine both since Graysons great grandfather was one of the main owls trying to kill Batman, and he's already dead.
  
• Have the major sidekicks established (Grayson, Drake, Todd, Barbara.......no damian), and go into it arkham city style.
  
• stop making Batman movies

In my opinion, they should go with the court of owls cuz they're quite freaky, and their story uses the sidekicks of Batman in a very significant way.

Not sure what that is.

 

[Voorhees27]

Re: The Dark Knight Rises

in ancient times crying was very manly, because in ancient Greek culture, men were expected to cry if their family's honor was at stake. One of the greatest signs of true manliness was to shed tears, medieval heroes and even Beowulf himself cried like babies throughout their adventures

 

[jye4ever]

Re: The Dark Knight Rises

Which is amazingly shortsighted and removes one of the key aspects of the character itself. Batman was always the man amongst Gods who could not only hold his own amongst them but beat them and to have him exist in a vacuum and not even reveal that portion of the character's history and being really always bugged me. You didn't have to have a cameo in every flick or stockpile DC characters in his films but at least an acknowledgment of a greater universe or even an off-hand remark about "dealing with the Kryptonian's problems" or "helping the yahoo with the ring" would go miles to establish it instead of Nolan simply wanting to paint in one color.

As for the jump-off point, I guarantee you he could have easily made his films but left the door open for Batman to be amongst others when he was done, it was a conscious choice to do Batman alone and he even told and said he'd help reboot another Batman who could be in a film DCU because of it. Who is to say that a Nolan story couldn't have set the tone for the rest of the DCU? Instead we're getting something that is bottlenecking the rest of the universe because we have to wait until 2014 to get things going (if recent rumors are true and Cavill's Superman will be vacuumed like Nolan originally stated)

Did GL fail because of Nolan's universe neglet or do you think Nolan did an "I told you so" to WB.

 

[crows]

Re: The Dark Knight Rises

Which is amazingly shortsighted and removes one of the key aspects of the character itself. Batman was always the man amongst Gods who could not only hold his own amongst them but beat them and to have him exist in a vacuum and not even reveal that portion of the character's history and being really always bugged me. You didn't have to have a cameo in every flick or stockpile DC characters in his films but at least an acknowledgment of a greater universe or even an off-hand remark about "dealing with the Kryptonian's problems" or "helping the yahoo with the ring" would go miles to establish it instead of Nolan simply wanting to paint in one color.

As for the jump-off point, I guarantee you he could have easily made his films but left the door open for Batman to be amongst others when he was done, it was a conscious choice to do Batman alone and he even told and said he'd help reboot another Batman who could be in a film DCU because of it. Who is to say that a Nolan story couldn't have set the tone for the rest of the DCU? Instead we're getting something that is bottlenecking the rest of the universe because we have to wait until 2014 to get things going (if recent rumors are true and Cavill's Superman will be vacuumed like Nolan originally stated)

Im happy about it, Burton did the same, no problem there, spiderman did the same, I mean, I know Avengers is cool and all, but I like my heroes separated from each other, Unless the story is combining them,
I would hate to see something related to superman in a batman movie, Unless they are doing Justice league, then leave
them alone,

i know comics have them cross all the time, but seeing green lantern or superman in batman and is not a justice league movie for me it would suck. It would take away from batman, it would just suck, i mean in a batman movie.

arent the batman cartoons the same? batman alone?
does superman or wonder woman appear in Batman: Arkham City? i mean, is it necessary?

 

[freestylex06x]

Re: The Dark Knight Rises

Which is amazingly shortsighted and removes one of the key aspects of the character itself. Batman was always the man amongst Gods who could not only hold his own amongst them but beat them and to have him exist in a vacuum and not even reveal that portion of the character's history and being really always bugged me. You didn't have to have a cameo in every flick or stockpile DC characters in his films but at least an acknowledgment of a greater universe or even an off-hand remark about "dealing with the Kryptonian's problems" or "helping the yahoo with the ring" would go miles to establish it instead of Nolan simply wanting to paint in one color.

As for the jump-off point, I guarantee you he could have easily made his films but left the door open for Batman to be amongst others when he was done, it was a conscious choice to do Batman alone and he even told and said he'd help reboot another Batman who could be in a film DCU because of it. Who is to say that a Nolan story couldn't have set the tone for the rest of the DCU? Instead we're getting something that is bottlenecking the rest of the universe because we have to wait until 2014 to get things going (if recent rumors are true and Cavill's Superman will be vacuumed like Nolan originally stated)

lol are you serious? you really think mentioning superman or green lantern in nolan's interpretation would not be awkward or be a misfit? just because you aren't getting a JL movie, don't say ridiculous things. i so sorry that Warner Brothers didn't consider your feelings when they green lighted these films.