Re: The Dark Knight Rises
That's exactly what a reboot is. Nolan and WB have said this is it for this series. There will be a totally new series to follow. HOPEFULLY they don't spend a whole movie on the origin like ASM is choosing to do. We've already seen it. Just give us a fully formed Batman and introduce us to some new villains!
Yeah nothing wrong with that. In fact when BB came out, Nolan stated that one of his goals was to tell the story of how Bruce Wayne became Batman...something that hadn't been done on film in this level of detail up until that point. I agree, now that the origin is told on film, let's just jump in.
I see this mentality as a waste. We've been investing in this Batman since Begins hit the big screen. Hell, some of us since the teaser poster of him standing on the gargoyle. To suddenly end it now, after only 3 films, and then reboot it in 2014 (date's already set), just seems like all this ____ was a wasted cash-in for WB. As much as it'd suck, honestly, I'd rather JGL take up the cowl in the new Batman and have it relate to this by the thinnest of threads, than have this closed and yet another mindless reboot of the franchise to deal with until they get bored of that and decide to do the same ____ all over again.
That's exactly why it should be a fresh reboot. Now that Nolan and Bale are done with Batman, for the WB to put
this series on life support with another director and star just to milk out a few more films in
this universe would be the worst possible outcome for everyone: fans of this specific series, fans who want to see a different take, fans of the character in general, and even WB execs who are only interested in a profit.
For fans of the Nolan series:
Quit while it's ahead, end it with finality, and don't leave it open for another director to continue the story. Better to end it on purpose, on a high note, than force it to continue and drag it out and put a bad taste in everyone's mouth for the whole series. Nolan is wrapping up his arc, and no he doesn't
own Batman, but for those who liked this series under Nolan, it's best to not risk someone else tainting his vision and messing it up.
For those that didn't like / felt "meh" about the Nolan series:
Rejoice! The reign of hyper-realistic-but-not-really Batman is over! Finally we'll get a director with more of a fantasy/comic-booky slant. Forcing a continuation of the Nolan-built universe, even if Nolan isn't at the helm, would just piss off those who are tired of this take on the character.
For fans of the Batman character/"brand" in general:
Let's just see something else because we all remember what happened the last time WB forced a Batman franchise to keep going when it's initial star and director bailed. Sure, they probably sold more toys and happy meals as the series limped on, but in there effort not to waste a "cash-in" the quality of the films declined, and critics and fans alike booed. Fans of Batman--in general--don't want the brand to go through that mess again.
Don't worry about a wasted cash-in for the WB. Batman on the big screen almost always puts butts in theater seats, period. The WB knows this, but they also know that putting crappy Batman on the screen, just to continue the movie series pisses people off.
The Burton Batman film franchise was decimated under Schumacher. Eight years later Nolan revives it Batman Begins does well enough at the box office to warrant a sequel. The Dark Knight is currently the highest grossing non-James-Cameron single-release movie of all time. Whatever your opinion of the subjective quality of his Bat-films, there's no denying he saved the franchise. It's not even debatable.
For the WB execs and the fanboys who want MOAR of the Nolan-verse, even if it's without Nolan:
Catwoman might as well have been speaking to Nolan in the trailer:
"You don't owe these people anymore. You've given them everything."