Re: The Official "The Hobbit" movie thread
^ Irish doesn't like a movie, that means I will love it!
^ Irish doesn't like a movie, that means I will love it!
^ Irish doesn't like a movie, that means I will love it!
Yes, I've seen it. And I honestly can't see how anyone will objectively call it the best movie of the year.
It's good, but it's easily the 4th best in this series of films, so far. And not nearly the best picture of 2012. That's where the expectations need to be set. Set them neither too high, or as low as some might put out there.
boring ! are you kidding me. i know people dont want to see it but The dark knight trilogy is the best superhero movies ever made.
nothing comes close to it. yeaa avengers was awsome but it dosent even come close as an epic masterpice then TDKR. nolan is a master at story telling. some people just refuse to see the movie for what it is. the true masterpice of 2012.
Besides, some of you guys need to learn to embrace and appreciate more than just these nerd movies. Neither TDKR or Hobbit is close to the best films of 2012. And I actually liked them. But some of you have gone full retard on this stuff. Geez.
I gotta say I was intent on seeing this at 48fps, now, I am leaning toward the standard
That said, i wanna see this in Imax - for those 9 min of Trek!
Can someone recap the whole fps issue again? I seem to be having difficulty keeping track.
So the higher rate is actually... not as good as the lower rate? I don't get it.
The higher frame rate (48fps) makes it look like a soap opera or live TV.
TDKR was never the best movie of 2012.
Dredd is the best movie of the year, and the best movie ever.
TDKR isn't a wart on the ass of ARGO or LINCOLN (just off the top of my head).
And I'm sorry, but HOBBIT is no FOTR, either.
Besides, some of you guys need to learn to embrace and appreciate more than just these nerd movies. Neither TDKR or Hobbit is close to the best films of 2012. And I actually liked them. But some of you have gone full retard on this stuff. Geez.
?
I liked it, overall. It'd probably give it a 7.5 or 8 out of 10, actually. It's just not up to par with the LOTR trilogy... on a few levels.
Unless you mean I'm not going to fawn over it and overlook its issues and that means you will love it...
Damn, tell me you guys aren't going to be as sensitive as the TDKR masturbators.
About what i expected. Good, but not LOTR trilogy good. (although i do get the feeling a lot of these reviewers/critics have not even read the book)
I'm just busting your chops!
Personally, I doubt it will reach the same level for me as the LOTR trilogy did.
Did you watch it in HFR or regular?
That shouldn't matter one iota. Not only is this obviously an adaptation into a completely different medium, but as a movie it should stand on its own without any prejudice or knowledge of the original source material.
The LOTR films did this well. They were fully accessible to both hardcore Ringers and newbs alike. But I feel this one won't play quite as well to the mainstream and non-Tolkienites, because Jackson tends to go just a bit too far several times. There's barely a hint of the sublime greatness that was in some of the LOTR movies.
Did you factor the HFR into your grading like some critics or only base it on the film content itself? A lot of the critics are giving this a low rating simply because of HFR which to me shouldn't be a factor.
That's just the thing though. There's no way you could possibly fit everything from the LOTR book into films. This being a children's book you could/can. (and even more as PJ and the studio of course has elected to do) It's just the nature of THIS story is not as epic or grand as the one from the LOTR books. Which is why i seeing it being as you said ( and i always thought) Good, just not LOTR GOOD.
Yes, I've seen it. And I honestly can't see how anyone will objectively call it the best movie of the year.
It's good, but it's easily the 4th best in this series of films, so far. And not nearly the best picture of 2012. That's where the expectations need to be set. Set them neither too high, or as low as some might put out there.
That said, Ringers take heart: Other than some of the cheesy dwarf stuff my main problems with this movie are the pacing (particularly the first hour) and overall bloat. I say take heart, because I'm probably the one person in the world who absolutely likes the Theatrical version of FELLOWSHIP more than the Extended, which I feel guts much of its charm... particularly in the first act... for unnecessary Tolkien-fan indulgences.
Still, if you count both versions of each of the previous 3 films I'd still probably rank this one 7th.
I'd write a more in-depth review, but honestly Devin at BadAssDigest pretty much nails my sentiments 100% (which is odd, since I don't usually agree with him):
https://badassdigest.com/2012/12/04/movie-review-the-hobbit-an-unexpected-journey-is-perfectly-okay/
Another note, though: he was smart to see it in 24fps whereas I saw it in the new 48fps format, which I absolutely hated. Still, I'm sure the technical aesthetic didn't affect my issues with the movie itself.
?
Unless you mean I'm not going to fawn over it and overlook its issues and that means you will love it...
Damn, tell me you guys aren't going to be as sensitive as the TDKR masturbators.
Enter your email address to join: