The "Random BS & Medical Conspiracies" Thread

[Batty]

Re: How has the flu season been for you?

did you get the six pack abs it promised to deliver?

No...but I did buy a six pack at the store.

 

[ZsaszSays]

Re: The "Random BS" Thread

I changed the name of the thread.

 

[Solidus]

Re: The "Random BS" Thread

I changed the name of the thread.

Well, there's already one of those in The Sandbox

https://www.sideshowcollectors.com/forums/showthread.php?137132-Snake-Plissken-s-Gentlemen-s-Club/page784

As for the season, I've been alright. One glass of OJ in the morning and I'm good to go. Vitamin C really does help a lot.

 

[ZsaszSays]

Re: The "Random BS" Thread

Im sure there is...but this thread just turned into pretty much just that...random BS.

 

[Lejuan]

Autism link to vaccines dismissed:

https://www.theguardian.com/society...ed-by-studies-of-more-than-a-million-children

 

[fosing]

Boom.

*hints of blog links and wall of words post to follow

 

[devilof76]

Now it's a pahty.

https://m.hopkinsmedicine.org/kimme...eatured/cancer_update_email_it_is_a_hoax.html

 

[Sweet Rabbit]

 

[fosing]

Now it's a pahty.

https://m.hopkinsmedicine.org/kimme...eatured/cancer_update_email_it_is_a_hoax.html

desperate measures. LOLZ

 

[Blackthornone]

Now it's a pahty.

https://m.hopkinsmedicine.org/kimme...eatured/cancer_update_email_it_is_a_hoax.html

You must be bored.
First of all, John's Hopkins is an allopathic medical institution, and allopathic medicine was made the only approved method of medical care by Rockefeller ENTIRELY because it offered the highest potential for profit.

That is basically the entire agenda of the AMA.Treatment for pay is their agenda. Prevention cuts into profits, so any kind of prevention is something they speak not of, unless it is to try to disprove it. It is their entire business model. The AMA is a business for profit, NOT a non profit humanitarian organization. Let's get that much clear.


In the cases of emergency health care, like fixing broken bones and repairing bullet wounds, the AMA business model is great. They provide a life saving service that is the best in the world, for a monetary compensation. When something works and is best, a monetary compensation is fair. If someone gets rich from really saving lives, ok.

If however their methods don't work, because their methods don't work in diseases that are chronic, because their medical model does not support the body's functions, it only uses drugs to tell the body to do things, AND those drugs have so "side" effects as well, that is not ok at all. It is worse when they deride other methods of care because people seeking other care cuts into their business.
It is worse still when they publish misinformation from flawed studies designed to make it look like natural methods don't work.
Natural methods work best for long term illness reversal, because they support the natural healing processes of the body.

The body requires a certain level of nutrients in order to function properly, in order to heal itself. If you put things in the body which are poisonous, like foods with pesticides and other toxins, that will attack the health of the body and eventually will cause disease.


Logic should tell you that.


It just doesn't happen overnight in most cases, so as long as it isn't overnight, people with their short term attention spans are led to the erroneous conclusion that things they ate had nothing to do with their illness.
Natural methods are ineffective in dealing with broken bones or bullet holes, so allopathic medicine with likely always be best for that.

The question is, do people get all the nutrients they need to maintain optimum health? How much of what nutrients are necessary to maintain adequate health, over what period of time? The smaller the deficiency, the longer it will takes for problems to arise.

The other question is, how much of which toxins or combination of which toxins causes disease in the body? Can you cure those diseases that those toxins cause WITHOUT eliminating them from the diet? Well, if you don't stop the cause, you won't really fix the problem. You can only MANAGE a condition if you never stop the cause. THAT you see, is where the big money is.

Some drugs have over 125,000% profit. That's some serious money right there, and those drugs are designed to manage symptoms of conditions, the causes of which are never stopped.

Stopping the cause of disease cuts into profits, and with this much money on the line, those who make drugs have immense money and power to influence the system to manipulate politicians and the media to protect those profits.

That's the business of allopathic medicine really works, you know.

Chemotherapy DOES kill a lot of normal cells, and even forms super cancer cells, which are even more resistant to further treatments.
It has always killed normal cells along with cancer cells. To say it doesn't is a lie. The better you aim the chemo, only at the cancer cells, the better the patient does if using chemo. Unfortunately you cannot only kill cancer cells with chemo like a sniper. Chemo cannot be contained to one area of the body.
As far as surgery, if it is a small enough mass of cancer cells, if the surgeon is careful enough, all of the cancer can be removed without spreading.
That is the BEST result that allopathic medicine can offer with cancer.

However, it STILL doesn't address the CAUSE of cancer. Therefore, if the cause isn't stopped, since cancer came out of "nowhere" before and made THAT mass of cancer cells, it WILL happen again to cause another mass of cancer cells somewhere else in time. Allopathic medicine doesn't deal with prevention, because their business model is excluding that.

For example, pesticides are fat soluble and cause cancer.


Women with breast cancer have over 51% higher concentrations of pesticides in their breast tissue than women without breast cancer. (breast tissue is largely fatty tissue, so it makes sense that fat soluble pesticides would accumulate in the breasts) This is from The Breast Cancer prevention Program, by Samuel Epstein, M.D.
They don't talk very much about the importance of eating only organic foods in preventing cancer in doctor's offices or the media, do they?

Could it be because the same companies that make chemotherapy drugs also make the pesticides which cause cancer?
I think so.


The real cause of cancer is not genetic, but epigenetic and environmental. Behavior and environment affect how the genetics are expressed.

here are a couple of excellent videos on Epigenetics. The first one is a NOVA program.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D44cu7v9x1w

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqG5TagD0uU

 

[ZsaszSays]

 

[Solidus]

Just as expected .

 

[teemu]

You must be bored.
First of all, John's Hopkins is an allopathic medical institution, and allopathic medicine was made the only approved method of medical care by Rockefeller ENTIRELY because it offered the highest potential for profit.

That is basically the entire agenda of the AMA.Treatment for pay is their agenda. Prevention cuts into profits, so any kind of prevention is something they speak not of, unless it is to try to disprove it. It is their entire business model. The AMA is a business for profit, NOT a non profit humanitarian organization. Let's get that much clear.


In the cases of emergency health care, like fixing broken bones and repairing bullet wounds, the AMA business model is great. They provide a life saving service that is the best in the world, for a monetary compensation. When something works and is best, a monetary compensation is fair. If someone gets rich from really saving lives, ok.

If however their methods don't work, because their methods don't work in diseases that are chronic, because their medical model does not support the body's functions, it only uses drugs to tell the body to do things, AND those drugs have so "side" effects as well, that is not ok at all. It is worse when they deride other methods of care because people seeking other care cuts into their business.
It is worse still when they publish misinformation from flawed studies designed to make it look like natural methods don't work.
Natural methods work best for long term illness reversal, because they support the natural healing processes of the body.

The body requires a certain level of nutrients in order to function properly, in order to heal itself. If you put things in the body which are poisonous, like foods with pesticides and other toxins, that will attack the health of the body and eventually will cause disease.


Logic should tell you that.


It just doesn't happen overnight in most cases, so as long as it isn't overnight, people with their short term attention spans are led to the erroneous conclusion that things they ate had nothing to do with their illness.
Natural methods are ineffective in dealing with broken bones or bullet holes, so allopathic medicine with likely always be best for that.

The question is, do people get all the nutrients they need to maintain optimum health? How much of what nutrients are necessary to maintain adequate health, over what period of time? The smaller the deficiency, the longer it will takes for problems to arise.

The other question is, how much of which toxins or combination of which toxins causes disease in the body? Can you cure those diseases that those toxins cause WITHOUT eliminating them from the diet? Well, if you don't stop the cause, you won't really fix the problem. You can only MANAGE a condition if you never stop the cause. THAT you see, is where the big money is.

Some drugs have over 125,000% profit. That's some serious money right there, and those drugs are designed to manage symptoms of conditions, the causes of which are never stopped.

Stopping the cause of disease cuts into profits, and with this much money on the line, those who make drugs have immense money and power to influence the system to manipulate politicians and the media to protect those profits.

That's the business of allopathic medicine really works, you know.

Chemotherapy DOES kill a lot of normal cells, and even forms super cancer cells, which are even more resistant to further treatments.
It has always killed normal cells along with cancer cells. To say it doesn't is a lie. The better you aim the chemo, only at the cancer cells, the better the patient does if using chemo. Unfortunately you cannot only kill cancer cells with chemo like a sniper. Chemo cannot be contained to one area of the body.
As far as surgery, if it is a small enough mass of cancer cells, if the surgeon is careful enough, all of the cancer can be removed without spreading.
That is the BEST result that allopathic medicine can offer with cancer.

However, it STILL doesn't address the CAUSE of cancer. Therefore, if the cause isn't stopped, since cancer came out of "nowhere" before and made THAT mass of cancer cells, it WILL happen again to cause another mass of cancer cells somewhere else in time. Allopathic medicine doesn't deal with prevention, because their business model is excluding that.

For example, pesticides are fat soluble and cause cancer.


Women with breast cancer have over 51% higher concentrations of pesticides in their breast tissue than women without breast cancer. (breast tissue is largely fatty tissue, so it makes sense that fat soluble pesticides would accumulate in the breasts) This is from The Breast Cancer prevention Program, by Samuel Epstein, M.D.
They don't talk very much about the importance of eating only organic foods in preventing cancer in doctor's offices or the media, do they?

Could it be because the same companies that make chemotherapy drugs also make the pesticides which cause cancer?
I think so.


The real cause of cancer is not genetic, but epigenetic and environmental. Behavior and environment affect how the genetics are expressed.

here are a couple of excellent videos on Epigenetics. The first one is a NOVA program.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D44cu7v9x1w

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqG5TagD0uU

It's nice to read posts with ACTUAL Intelligence and FACTS behind it

The biggest factor the American Murder Association won't tell you is Cancer cannot live in an Alkaline body state, while Cancer thrives in an Acidic body state.Cancer cannot live where there is Oxygen in the blood.

To maintain PH balance can ONLY be obtained by Diet and eating proper Alkaline foods,which with SIMPLE research,you can find out what they are.People that have High Acidity (level 2-4) are prone to getting disease,Cancer and then eventual death.Cancer comes upon a person for a REASON and bad Diet (along with chemical additives they consume) is the biggest part of why it has become the epidemic today.

 

[ExMem-LarjaThwei]

For ****'s sake, put spaces after your punctuation.

 

[toylion]

For ****'s sake, put spaces after your punctuation.

 

[Lejuan]

Stupid doesn't cause cancer, lucky for some.

 

[devilof76]

If I must be bored, who just wasted all that space on **** no one will read?

People of your dim ilk, Reverend (and teemu...lol...go buy Destro...eventually you'll place enough orders that he'll sell out) saw fit to spread a fake meme using the name of Johns Hopkins to give their horse**** a paper thin veneer of reputability, attempting to convince others of their non-science. Why? Because independent peer review is something they are not worthy of. Johns Hopkins employs some of the world's finest oncologists, doing their damnedest to save the lives of people stricken with this insanely complex disease. They aren't posting walls of meaningless conspiracy theory garbage on toy forums for the sake of their own personal, myopic, morally pretentious aggrandizement. Do you know why? Because they actually give a damn about saving lives. You and the rest of your bacteria colony only care about...I haven't a ****ing clue. You do not care about people dying of cancer. I know that much.

So, go back to your pulpit you brainwashed commie ****. Do the world a favor and shut the **** up.

 

[Y4NK33 PL4N3T]

 

[Solidus]

It's no surprise that a "conspiracy" related thread got bombed by the Tin Foil Hat Society

 

[Lejuan]

It's nice to read posts with ACTUAL Intelligence and FACTS behind it

You'd no doubt make the same claim about the bible. Face it Teemu, you're more about faith than facts.