Bannister
Super Freak
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2005
- Messages
- 12,753
- Reaction score
- 0
I think Scott Hall is a lost cause.
Having seen that espn piece on him last year and already being aware of his drug history I am shocked he is still alive.
I think Scott Hall is a lost cause.
Having seen that espn piece on him last year and already being aware of his drug history I am shocked he is still alive.
Despite Punk's popularity, Cena is still the face of the company. I'm sure Lesnar will have ample opportunity to go after the title later on.Help me out here, I know that Punk & Cena have their own storylines to follow. But if Lauringitis is trying to bring back "legitimacy" to the WWE why would you sic Lesnar on Cena? Wouldn't it make more sense to make Lesnar go after the WWE title?
Yep, I agree with you on all points. Though I think they succeeded more at getting fans to boo Lesnar more than to cheer Cena. The end of last night's show was ridiculous, with all the legends hanging around and celebrating with Seamus after the predictably "comical" defeat of Bryan and humiliation of Cole. I guess the WWE went into a time warp and thought it was 1992 again.Wow that Smackdown blast from the past special SUCKED! And it looks like that great RAW that happened after Wrestlemania was a one off, and it's back to being crap again. Also do you see how the WWE are manipulating the fans to cheer for Cena by making Brock buddy up to John Laryngitis, I hope it fails and Cena gets booed out of the Extreme rules arena.
Word. . . . .Give the title to Heath Slater and get it over with.
Wow that Smackdown blast from the past special SUCKED! And it looks like that great RAW that happened after Wrestlemania was a one off, and it's back to being crap again. Also do you see how the WWE are manipulating the fans to cheer for Cena by making Brock buddy up to John Laryngitis, I hope it fails and Cena gets booed out of the Extreme rules arena.
I didn't really think it was all that great, really. Punk defends his title the night after defending it at Wrestlemania? Talk about diluting it. As for Cena/Brock, I'm surprised they didn't pull a switcheroo and try having Brock as the babyface and Cena turning heel. In the end I think fans are bored and neither really offer any promise of anything even remotely epic. The WWE needs some stiffer competition to make things interesting again.
Closest thing they have after Cena is Punk, but he's too clever and sarcastic to catch on with the audience that loves Cena. I think both of those guys appeal to the two major demographics that the WWE wants to target. Randy Orton is in a distant third. I don't know that he has the charisma to really become the number one guy on the number one show (Raw).Does the WWE have a top babyface right now?
Maybe it was because of the fan reaction more than anything else, the return of Brock, and surprising support of Bryan, but I thought that was a pretty great Raw. We'll see how Brock turns out, though. I do think the fans were a bit underwhelmed by his mike skills this last Monday. Many of them probably never saw his first go around, are just supportive of him because of the hype, and had unreasonable expectations in that department.
In other words--the same way they first built up Brock
I agree. Who can play the role of the Hardy Boys 2.0?
Whatever happened to Dibiase Jr? After watching Marine 2, I was actually surprised the dude can act. They should be giving him a push as a babyface and trying to milk potential there, especially given his pedigree. Instead, they're fooling around with Cena who's played out, Punk, whose wimpy version of Austin's gimmick is limited at best and Randy Orton who still, despite all the push he's received, hasn't yet caught on as much as he should've.
Yeah, Dibiase, Jr. lacks "it."
Who needs Goldberg when they have Ryberg, I mean Ryback now.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwb_DZVEGuM
I wonder how long this gimmick lasts? Good clothesline, but that's thanks to Barry Stevens selling it
Enter your email address to join: