Twilight

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Keith and CHUD must hate each other:

A Nice Hard Slap - ^^^^ This Face.
10/16/2008

It's painfully easy to rip on Twilight, not only because there is no way it can possibly be good. Not only because vampires are absolute horse^^^^ 88% of the time. Not only because nearly everything that isn't my ^^^^ embraced by recently pubed girls tends to be horrible. Not only because Peter Facinelli features prominently. Even the considerable presence of Catherine Hardwicke behind the lens does nothing to negate the utter ^^^^ballness of another unneccessary vampire story featuring young people looking all drab and dreamy.

The real reason to hate Twilight sight unseen is simple. This face:

twilight_group_shot-small.jpg


I'm sure 22 year-old actor Robert Pattinson's not a bad person in real life, but that doesn't keep me from wanting him to experience grievous trauma simply for being in the wrong place at the wrong time and looking like he does in this completely overused photograph. I think his look succinctly sums up why I hate vampires 88% of the time ALL OF THE TIME.

Is it the overstyled hair? That's part of it. Is it the way the makeup is used to emphasize the kid's already blandly superboymodel cheekbones? Certainly. But mostly it's the look. The "I'm undead and so sexy it'll hurt your tween clit" glare.

Vampires are dumb. Twilight is dumb (I've read zero pages and it's probably good but I'll never know because I don't want to be wrong when it comes ot horrible vampire bull^^^^). That this will be a phenomenon is dumb. You pay to see this? You're dumb.

^^^^ this face until its cheeks are rosy, its hair is flattened out, and the expression is of fatigue and baffled sadness. Nothing good can come of it.


And the follow-up:


A Nice Hard Slap - ^^^^ This Face II: ^^^^ This Face Harder
11/2/2008

I have to admit that I'm both alarmed, warmed, and slightly nauseous at the response to my blog about the chiseled and boring face of the kid from Twilight. People seemed to think it was some heavily researched editorial rather than a blog I took five minutes to write. For those who don't know, a blog to me is a stream-of-consciousness missive to be judged on a much different level than an actual article. Blogs are fun but in my case they're mostly trivial little excuses to keep a line of communication with the reader rather than actual articles or editorials. Blogs are to those as parsley is to an entree. Garnish, a little added value but not of the same merit.

But I'm a blog snob, so whatever...

But I have to hand it to the fan base of Twilight, because they take the cake. After doing some research I'm proud to say that even considering the rabid fanbases for multitudes of other properties out there, they are the most rabid and quick to fight of any out there. Which is pretty incredible considering how flimsy and lame and easy their beloved property is. Twilight is by most accounts by people old enough to vote vapid tripe, teen gothic literature for those unwilling to hunt out the decent and time-tried stuff out there. It seems to make Anne Rice's work look like F. Scott Fitzgerald in comparison.

The response from fans has been funny, one-dimensional, and telling.

It's either "You'll never get laid", "You don't know anything about anything", or "You're ugly and only jealous of the glorious Edward Cullen". I must admit, I don't consider myself a prime lothario but rather a man who can get by on three or four sexual encounters with other people a week. Additionally, I don't know much about anything but I can hold my own when discussing somethings, whatevers, widgets, and thingies. Lastly, I am not as superficially attractive as the effete young Robert Pattinson but once you get to know me my charms slip to the surface where they do yeoman's work. With that all in mind, the majority of the people who piped in with comments are not only fans of a silly property but representative of much that is wrong with the state of blue chip franchises and their fans.

With Star Wars thankfully running on fumes, Harry Potter almost spent [and to casual fans like myself, just simply tired], Pirates of the Caribbean probably not deserving of the same pedigree, and The Lord of the Rings several years away from pounding our senses, it's mostly about the comic book stuff and the next wave of artificially sweetened fantasy literature to carry the torch.

Thing is, everything feels processed these days. Built to sell. Lowest common denominator stuff. How does Twilight reach the spotlight when the shelves are packed with very similar droves of weak gothic vampire ^^^^ geared towards girls old enough to read but too young to have taste.

Then I saw the trailer. And the MySpace takeover.

Holy crap, this is more dire than I feared.

That a few Twilight blogs (surely no one could actually cobble a content driven WEBSITE, and for those who don't know... this place is a site as opposed to a measly sub-superior blog) linked to my blog, which is not an article but rather a simple little missive, doesn't surprise me. It seems that defending Twilight is thirsty work. I mean, imagine how many literate people there are out there who have read countless books in the vampire genre that are about more than creating drama for the barely menstrual. I'd imagine any of those folks with some free time and web access can wreak havoc on a Twilight fan's dreams, what with their knowledge and savvy!

Let me pigeonhole a little:

You might be a Twilight reader if...

1. You're single, over 30, and tend to shop at Lane Bryant.

2. You're in middle school or high school and trying to figure out what to do with yourself because you hate the cheerleaders but think it's time to stop ironically wearing Hello Kitty stuff.

3. You're a boy and can't find where dad hides his gun and bullets.

4. You're a boy and really want to ^^^^ that goth girl in 3rd period French.

5. You're a junior executive at ICM and need to be on top of ^^^^.

6. You are a molestor and need an icebreaker.

7. ^^^^ you.

I've pissed off the kids. I also got to Harry Knowles. But the bottom line isn't about the material. In reality, there's a new Twilight every half decade whether it takes the form of the Christopher Paolini's dragon books, the Demonata series, or the Anita Blake books. It's more a matter of priorities. When is too young to start reaching for more? When is it time to be mildly impressed by a property to the point of wanting to find out what's better out there?

When I was younger I was ravenous for material. Once I saw a cool movie I wanted to find out everything by that filmmaker, everything in that genre, and all the stuff that led to its existence. As a young reader I got into Stephen King and read everything I could get my hands on, which filtered to the authors he recommended in Danse Macabre and on down the line.

It seems that with the incredible amount of information at people's fingertips, there isn't that same yearning for BETTER. The people who live and die by this particular series seem to be selling themselves awfully short. To muster the bile to defend it seems ill spent.

Then again to write a series of blogs (^^^^ This Face With a Vengeance is forthcoming) is also time ill spent. I just think I've found something here. Something more oddly fanatical than the near sexual frenzies generated by Trekkies, Browncoats, and Star-^^^^^^^s or whatever they're calling themselves this year.

Sucklings (what I'm calling Twlight fans until something better happens) are a breed altogether new. Special? Maybe in the same way that olympians are. Regardless, I've only scratched the surface of this phenomenon, though I doubt they'll bring the same amount of vitroil to the comments section of this one.
 
Um so who's ready for this? :eek::peace:eek:

Although I had no desire to finish the series after I read the first book (the very amateurish writing style bugged me and the main characters just annoyed me after a while), I'm still interested to see the movie (just to see how it's been adapted).
 
Damn Irish! That guy is funny but I bet he's a minger. He is taking out all that years of abuse on people who read the book because he is a fat slob and was probably beat up in school. :lol Seriously it was a funny rant though. :lol
 
because nearly everything that isn't my ^^^^ embraced by recently pubed girls tends to be horrible.

:lol :lol :lol :lol


The "I'm undead and so sexy it'll hurt your tween clit" glare.

Jesus Christ, this guy pulls no punches.

You might be a Twilight reader if...

1. You're single, over 30, and tend to shop at Lane Bryant.

2. You're in middle school or high school and trying to figure out what to do with yourself because you hate the cheerleaders but think it's time to stop ironically wearing Hello Kitty stuff.

3. You're a boy and can't find where dad hides his gun and bullets.

4. You're a boy and really want to ^^^^ that goth girl in 3rd period French.

5. You're a junior executive at ICM and need to be on top of ^^^^.

6. You are a molestor and need an icebreaker.

7. ^^^^ you.

Holy ^^^^ I laughed really hard reading this list.
 
The only reason I see that happening is if guys would just give it a chance. I keep reading comments about how it is gay and lame but most people that say that never evem picked a book up. :dunno

That is true, it's the same with the Harry Potter books. "THAT'S GAY" well have you read them? "....UMM, NO WAY"

Then who the ^^^^ do you know it's gay. I'll give the first book a read through.
 
I had never even heard of it until about a month ago when the news here started doing stories about the movie.
 
To be honest, I think real vampire fans should see "Let the Right One In" instead. I think this movie is much better...

Review:

https://www.chicagotribune.com/ente...rightonein-review-1114_qnov14,0,3409364.story

"Let the Right One In" is one of the best movies of the year and easily one of the best vampire movies ever made (if not the best IMO, still can't decide). It caters to an entirely different audience though, and it certainly isn't the "Twilight" mob.
 
I have NO desire to see this film at all. A friend of my Wife's offered to take us all to see it for FREE and I declined. Honestly, any Vamp movie where the vamps have frosty white skin that "twinkles" in the daylight... um... Daylight??? :google

So the vamps are all models, or at least look like they were dragged out of the A&F catalog. And they can walk in broad daylight... and then the over the top powers, and complete and utter lack of horror... It just makes me cringe.

To me it's just lame to the millionth degree... I don't see the appeal at all. Give me scary vampires, and I am there. Make another great Anne Rice novel into a equally great film... I'm also there. But Twilight?? I'm so NOT there.

I would rather have my balls smothered in lava. :lol
 
People need to see Near Dark if they haven't already. One of my favorite modern vampire movies... Even if it is 21 years old.

Certainly no pretty boys in this movie. :lol

 
Near Dark rules! I just bought the Special Edition 2 Disc DVD not too long ago with a ton of special features.

Recommended.
 
Near Dark is really good... I just watched it last year for the first time and was really entertained :rock There are good Vampire flicks out there, but a lot of it (especially the sexy vampire stuff) is utter crap.
 
I have NO desire to see this film at all. A friend of my Wife's offered to take us all to see it for FREE and I declined. Honestly, any Vamp movie where the vamps have frosty white skin that "twinkles" in the daylight... um... Daylight??? :google

So the vamps are all models, or at least look like they were dragged out of the A&F catalog. And they can walk in broad daylight... and then the over the top powers, and complete and utter lack of horror... It just makes me cringe.

To me it's just lame to the millionth degree... I don't see the appeal at all. Give me scary vampires, and I am there. Make another great Anne Rice novel into a equally great film... I'm also there. But Twilight?? I'm so NOT there.

I would rather have my balls smothered in lava. :lol

A nice good hot sauce in the pee-hole would be sufficient too. :lol
 
Well, I'm not really a big fan of the Twilight books, myself. I read them at my daughter's insistence, and because I love vampire stories, and they were good, but not fantastic, if you know what I mean. But I have to say that those of you who are assuming it won't do boffo box office numbers must be living in caves somewhere.

For example, take the Titanic comparison. To some degree, Titanic may have had more adult appeal than Twilight, but that appeal probably only resulted in $75-100 million out of that film's $600 million domestic haul. The rest came from teenage girls, going back to see it ten times or more. I know, because my daughter was one of them. And I paid for most of those tickets.

Will Twilight have the legs that Titanic had? Only time will tell. But it does have that potential, more than any other film in the last ten years besides The Dark Knight has had.

What I do know is that it will be HUGE. Based on all of the reports I've heard, the number of midnight shows alone will be enough to generate about $25 million, and many theaters are reporting than many of the shows for the weekend are already pre-sold out. I'll be very surprised if the film does less than $80 million this weekend.
 
I am sure it will do amazingly well at the box office. I was at SDCC and saw the hordes of young girls going all crazy for the panel. I for one, will not be seeing this at the theater....maybe rental....but I'm like Dark Artist and prefer my vampires to be more on the horror side than teenage romance.
 
I too am being dragged to see it but at least it's free. I don't have very high hopes for this movie. I'm sure the target audience will love it, but I'm far from that target.
 
There's no denying that when tween girls get obsessed with something that they tend to be much worse than fanboys. These girls are going to make this movie huge, i work at Borders bookstore for awhile and we couldn't keep that book on the shelves.

I think the Titanic comparisson is apt here, girls will see something over and over and over where fanboys are usually on to the next thing. could it surpass TDK? Maybe - if it's made the way the girls want it. Never underestimate the power of the tween girl demo.

Oh and don't forget all the sex in the city girls they like this crap too. I personally hate that vampires are all supermodels or woe is me. I blame Anne Rice for the modern vampire crap we see now. They used to be scarry.
 
Back
Top