Keith and CHUD must hate each other:
And the follow-up:
A Nice Hard Slap - ^^^^ This Face.
10/16/2008
It's painfully easy to rip on Twilight, not only because there is no way it can possibly be good. Not only because vampires are absolute horse^^^^ 88% of the time. Not only because nearly everything that isn't my ^^^^ embraced by recently pubed girls tends to be horrible. Not only because Peter Facinelli features prominently. Even the considerable presence of Catherine Hardwicke behind the lens does nothing to negate the utter ^^^^ballness of another unneccessary vampire story featuring young people looking all drab and dreamy.
The real reason to hate Twilight sight unseen is simple. This face:
I'm sure 22 year-old actor Robert Pattinson's not a bad person in real life, but that doesn't keep me from wanting him to experience grievous trauma simply for being in the wrong place at the wrong time and looking like he does in this completely overused photograph. I think his look succinctly sums up why I hate vampires 88% of the time ALL OF THE TIME.
Is it the overstyled hair? That's part of it. Is it the way the makeup is used to emphasize the kid's already blandly superboymodel cheekbones? Certainly. But mostly it's the look. The "I'm undead and so sexy it'll hurt your tween clit" glare.
Vampires are dumb. Twilight is dumb (I've read zero pages and it's probably good but I'll never know because I don't want to be wrong when it comes ot horrible vampire bull^^^^). That this will be a phenomenon is dumb. You pay to see this? You're dumb.
^^^^ this face until its cheeks are rosy, its hair is flattened out, and the expression is of fatigue and baffled sadness. Nothing good can come of it.
And the follow-up:
A Nice Hard Slap - ^^^^ This Face II: ^^^^ This Face Harder
11/2/2008
I have to admit that I'm both alarmed, warmed, and slightly nauseous at the response to my blog about the chiseled and boring face of the kid from Twilight. People seemed to think it was some heavily researched editorial rather than a blog I took five minutes to write. For those who don't know, a blog to me is a stream-of-consciousness missive to be judged on a much different level than an actual article. Blogs are fun but in my case they're mostly trivial little excuses to keep a line of communication with the reader rather than actual articles or editorials. Blogs are to those as parsley is to an entree. Garnish, a little added value but not of the same merit.
But I'm a blog snob, so whatever...
But I have to hand it to the fan base of Twilight, because they take the cake. After doing some research I'm proud to say that even considering the rabid fanbases for multitudes of other properties out there, they are the most rabid and quick to fight of any out there. Which is pretty incredible considering how flimsy and lame and easy their beloved property is. Twilight is by most accounts by people old enough to vote vapid tripe, teen gothic literature for those unwilling to hunt out the decent and time-tried stuff out there. It seems to make Anne Rice's work look like F. Scott Fitzgerald in comparison.
The response from fans has been funny, one-dimensional, and telling.
It's either "You'll never get laid", "You don't know anything about anything", or "You're ugly and only jealous of the glorious Edward Cullen". I must admit, I don't consider myself a prime lothario but rather a man who can get by on three or four sexual encounters with other people a week. Additionally, I don't know much about anything but I can hold my own when discussing somethings, whatevers, widgets, and thingies. Lastly, I am not as superficially attractive as the effete young Robert Pattinson but once you get to know me my charms slip to the surface where they do yeoman's work. With that all in mind, the majority of the people who piped in with comments are not only fans of a silly property but representative of much that is wrong with the state of blue chip franchises and their fans.
With Star Wars thankfully running on fumes, Harry Potter almost spent [and to casual fans like myself, just simply tired], Pirates of the Caribbean probably not deserving of the same pedigree, and The Lord of the Rings several years away from pounding our senses, it's mostly about the comic book stuff and the next wave of artificially sweetened fantasy literature to carry the torch.
Thing is, everything feels processed these days. Built to sell. Lowest common denominator stuff. How does Twilight reach the spotlight when the shelves are packed with very similar droves of weak gothic vampire ^^^^ geared towards girls old enough to read but too young to have taste.
Then I saw the trailer. And the MySpace takeover.
Holy crap, this is more dire than I feared.
That a few Twilight blogs (surely no one could actually cobble a content driven WEBSITE, and for those who don't know... this place is a site as opposed to a measly sub-superior blog) linked to my blog, which is not an article but rather a simple little missive, doesn't surprise me. It seems that defending Twilight is thirsty work. I mean, imagine how many literate people there are out there who have read countless books in the vampire genre that are about more than creating drama for the barely menstrual. I'd imagine any of those folks with some free time and web access can wreak havoc on a Twilight fan's dreams, what with their knowledge and savvy!
Let me pigeonhole a little:
You might be a Twilight reader if...
1. You're single, over 30, and tend to shop at Lane Bryant.
2. You're in middle school or high school and trying to figure out what to do with yourself because you hate the cheerleaders but think it's time to stop ironically wearing Hello Kitty stuff.
3. You're a boy and can't find where dad hides his gun and bullets.
4. You're a boy and really want to ^^^^ that goth girl in 3rd period French.
5. You're a junior executive at ICM and need to be on top of ^^^^.
6. You are a molestor and need an icebreaker.
7. ^^^^ you.
I've pissed off the kids. I also got to Harry Knowles. But the bottom line isn't about the material. In reality, there's a new Twilight every half decade whether it takes the form of the Christopher Paolini's dragon books, the Demonata series, or the Anita Blake books. It's more a matter of priorities. When is too young to start reaching for more? When is it time to be mildly impressed by a property to the point of wanting to find out what's better out there?
When I was younger I was ravenous for material. Once I saw a cool movie I wanted to find out everything by that filmmaker, everything in that genre, and all the stuff that led to its existence. As a young reader I got into Stephen King and read everything I could get my hands on, which filtered to the authors he recommended in Danse Macabre and on down the line.
It seems that with the incredible amount of information at people's fingertips, there isn't that same yearning for BETTER. The people who live and die by this particular series seem to be selling themselves awfully short. To muster the bile to defend it seems ill spent.
Then again to write a series of blogs (^^^^ This Face With a Vengeance is forthcoming) is also time ill spent. I just think I've found something here. Something more oddly fanatical than the near sexual frenzies generated by Trekkies, Browncoats, and Star-^^^^^^^s or whatever they're calling themselves this year.
Sucklings (what I'm calling Twlight fans until something better happens) are a breed altogether new. Special? Maybe in the same way that olympians are. Regardless, I've only scratched the surface of this phenomenon, though I doubt they'll bring the same amount of vitroil to the comments section of this one.