- Joined
- Feb 5, 2006
- Messages
- 13,793
- Reaction score
- 0
He's got a point. I resisted Harry Potter for a while because it was perceived as a children's book. But once I got into it found it clever, fun and heartfelt.
I read Twilight because I felt like I needed to be aware of any pop culture phenomenon. I was really put off having read that the author had never seen Buffy nor watched any vampire movie, including the original Dracula. But some people succeed only because they don't know that they are doomed to fail. And she kind of did that.
I wasn't a huge fan of the first book, but the situation was compelling enough that I picked up the second. And they do get progressively better as the supernatural world broadens and becomes more complex. Hopefully she won't succumb to the Ann Rice syndrome of trying to be relevant and philosophical.
You pretty much just nailed how I feel about both Potter and Twilight. I'm only 200 pages into the last book so I'm hoping it gets better. So far it's been rather dull. This series is OK at best. I love certain things about it, but there are a lot of things that I don't like (many have been discussed).
But let's be fair, we are not the books target audience. I don't know one teenage girl who isn't obsessed with this series. This is like Titanic. It's a love story with tragedy around it. Girls eat that ^^^^ up.