I have a question, Barbelith: How are the action sequences?
The action sequences are fine. Snyder can do action. There isn't nearly as much slow motion as
300. And every comics fan everywhere is going to get a kick out of watching Dr Manhattan do his thing. Having said that, some of the action sequences don't actually make literal sense when you consider none of these people have powers.
Sometimes reviewers and critics don't know their heads from their ^^^ holes.
Absolutely. Everyone is going to see it anyway, so don't be dissuaded by reviews. Make up your own mind. I said earlier I think I'll be a minority. The collector demographic is going to go nuts for this movie.
I have a feeling that this film will be embraced by the fans of the graphic novel, but not really by the general public at large.
My fear is that the general public will think of the film when people cite
Watchmen as the best example of the comic medium and think, "How sad." Because the movie isn't smart or clever and a lot of people are going to be laughing at it. A lot more are probably going to be cheering it, but the fact remains it's nowhere near the cinematic achievement of
The Dark Knight (in my opinion); there's certainly nothing here past the visuals to explain why the book is so brilliant (and even the visuals sometimes work against that (see skinny Dan)).
And in a sense I think this is why Alan Moore fears adaptations. Because if you read
Watchmen and
From Hell and
V for Vendetta you realize you're dealing with the Stanley Kubrick of comics. But if you only know his work through these movies, you get a completely different experience. You don't know him or his work
at all. And I say that as someone who
enjoys those movies. All three are betrayals of their source material; none of them "gets it" and none of them are classics of their medium the way the comic versions were.
I've been thinking about this all day: Would I rather have a movie that's faithful to the thrust of the book while radically different visually or a movie that's faithful to the visuals while undermining the thrust of the book? And in the end I think I have to say I would rather we had what we got, so take that as a positive sign.
I didn't really mention history other than pointing out that without it's visual comic-flair, 300 is a pretty terrible movie.
That's my assessment too. There's a fair degree of that happening in
Watchmen. But there's also some geek overload happening that prevents me from tearing the movie apart. The flashbacks might be silly but that's Archimedes flying there, dammit!