WATCHMEN Movie Discussion (SPOILERS allowed)!

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
It'll already be released here in Germany on Thursday, and I got tickets for the premiere on Wednesday evening. :joy
Funny thing IMO, the cinema is promoting the premiere under the slogan "For Real Men" and there'll be a buy one beer, get one free promotion.
 
So why does the Imax version at Fandango not list a running time for the movie? Is it the same length, or have they made any cuts to shorten the running time?

Yes and no. They made cuts to both Theater and IMAX versions because IMAX cant be longer then 2hrs and 45 minutes.
 
Forgot to mention earlier - If you buy tickets from movietickets.com you get an iTunes link for a free download of part one of the motion comic and a preview of TOBF.
 
Better late than never, but I figured it's time for a Watchmen smiley.

watchmensmiley.jpg
 
this opens thursday Aussie time.Cant wait and will be going str8 after work!!!
This yr looks like a great year for the flicks with all the sci fi,fantasy,robotic stuff coming out.What a great way to kick off the year with WATCHMEN!!!!!
 
I'll try to post my thoughts/"review" later on today.

Sounds good. It'll be interesting to get a review from someone who isn't really fond of Snyder's work (or at least 300). Now that reviews are starting to peter in, I'm curious what the freak consensus will be... if there will be a consensus.
 
The EW review is in and Owen reviewed it rather than Lisa. Basically, he says that Snyder remained too faithful, and that the nihilism of the graphic novel comes through but is watered down in its impact because, according to the Glieb-man, "since the Cold War nuclear fears of the '80s never did come to pass."...

What a neck-deep crock of ^^^^. I don't think Glieberman understands this as a fictional alternative reality. It's not meant to be our world as it was, with us as the ultimate result.

I will say, though, that otherwise the review seems largely positive, and he definitely says it will be a feast for fanboys. I just think that ultimately he failed to understand the book itself, which is a pity to have someone like that review the movie and try to make them comparable.

https://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20262574,00.html
 
It'll be interesting to get a review from someone who isn't really fond of Snyder's work (or at least 300).

I gave it a mixed/positive review and I think 300 is absolute garbage. Although I will say my opinion has fallen somewhat upon reflection.

Basically, he says that Snyder remained too faithful, and that the nihilism of the graphic novel comes through but is watered down in its impact because, according to the Glieb-man, "since the Cold War nuclear fears of the '80s never did come to pass."...

What a neck-deep crock of ^^^^. I don't think Glieberman understands this as a fictional alternative reality. It's not meant to be our world as it was, with us as the ultimate result.

I'm sorry, but he's right. It's the major failing of Watchmen as a novel. The book was set up in an alternate universe to power the engine of the story but it was released at the height of the Cold War and about the Cold War as much as it was about superhero comics (and more to the point how idiotic superhero comics are compared to the reality of the Cold War). The book cannot be divorced from from that milieu and efforts to do so are doomed to silliness. Not only did we make it through, but real "squid" events have proved either fractious and destabilizing (9/11) or overlooked completely once the news celebration passes (the Asian tsunami). In fact the mass slaughter (intentional or otherwise, and it's worth remembering in Watchmen the squid was viewed as an accidental dimensional breach) of Johnny Foreigner is virtually ignored around the world.

Watchmen works in its own space (the novel anyway; I don't think the film holds together by the end). But it doesn't work in our space 25 years later. Unfortunately, it was supposed to, because it was about us as much as anything. Poor readers often call Watchmen nihilistic. It's not; it's incredibly naive. Brilliant, but naive.

Relegating the book to "alternative universe fiction" is like pretending 1984 isn't a political novel and ignores the reality of Watchmen's contemporary publishing. It was never escapist fiction (one of the reasons the fans of rapists and psychopaths stand out). The EW assessment is fair.
 
Back
Top