1. " X-Men Origins: Wolverine ," $87 million.
2. "Ghosts of Girlfriends Past," $15.3 million.
3. "Obsessed," $12.2 million.
4. "17 Again," $6.4 million.
5. "Monsters vs. Aliens," $5.8 million.
6. "The Soloist," $5.6 million.
8. "Earth," $4.18 million.
7. "Fighting," $4.17 million.
9. " Hannah Montana: The Movie ," $4.1 million.
10. " State of Play ," $3.7 million.
Wow....Wolverine definitely hauled it in this weekend:
Should be interesting to see how it does next few weeks with "Up", "Terminator: Salvation" and of course "Star Trek" hitting theatres.
While it doesn't excuse it, Cyclops never actually sees Logan because of the heavy blinders he wears throughout the facility. I haven't watched X1 in a while but I don't think he actually has an interaction with Sabretooth there but even if he did the look is so drastically different he wouldn't remember.
There are contradictions with the franchise but they did make sure that the character interactions were noted so they didn't.
I've been skipping through this thread and your post sums the movie up for me. I seen it opening day and although I liked it for an action movie, I was more then a little let down with the creative license they took with the characters.The only thing that I don't like so far about this new movie is the fact that they felt like they had to include all of these cameos to begin with. In XMen, it was understandable... that is a team story.
But Wolverine doesn't need all of that, and in fact... a true Origins tale of Wolverine would have been miles better if it just included Wolverine himself, Stryker, and Sabretooth. It didn't need all of these crazy cameos and characters, no "special team".
In fact, what I was initially excited to see back when this film was announced was Wolverine alone... doing his thing. I was expecting Wolvie fighting those who created him, a loose cannon... lost without memory. Maybe Sabretooth being sent after him to rein him under control for Stryker to use, and with the early scenes of them together... it would be dramatic and cool.
They didn't need XI or the team to make that happen, and by including all of that.. they cheapen the film and take away precious minutes that could have been used for character development.
I will still see it, seeing as I love Hugh as Wolverine and am curious. I also want to see Liev as Sabretooth, from the trailers he looks to have nailed it. But the team nonsense and all the cameo crap has me a bit worried. I guess I will see in another week.
IMHO the Adamantium being fused to his bones, which does have his healing power would make the Adamantium heal over to.Few things I noticed:
- Wolverine should now have two bullet holes in his skull. The adamantium doesn't heal right, so there would be the two holes left over that wouldn't ever heal up. And possibly some chips or other areas where he was also shot with the adamantium bullets.
There are definitely continuity issues but unless I'm mistaken, there's nothing that directly contradicts Cyclops having met Sabertooth or Prof X being on the island. Prof X never sees Logan on the island so he didn't necessarily know he was there. He is aware of who Sabertooth is when he tells Logan about him in X1. Cyclops never jumps in and says "he kidnapped me!" but that doesn't mean it didn't happen. He never expresses any confusion over who Sabertooth is in X1 (again, off the top of my head). In fact I think it sort of seemed like they had all run into each other before when Prof X gives Logan the nickname speech in X1.
I'm not trying to be argumentative. The flick's got problems for sure but I enjoyed it nonetheless.
Why Studios Need To Ignore The Fans
**THIS BLOG CONTAINS SPOILERS FOR SPIDER-MAN 3 AND, MUCH FURTHER DOWN AND SEPARATELY MARKED, WOLVERINE**
This blog was most directly inspired by X-Men Origins: Wolverine, but since I’m trying to avoid spoilers, let’s talk about Spider-Man 3 for a moment, as an example of a thesis I have developed; namely, that sometimes the studios need to man up and ignore the fans.
Consider Spidey 3’s production. The word is that Sam Raimi, having made two enormously successful wallcrawler films, was willing to come back for a third, and negotiations began about the right villains. Raimi wanted Sandman, a character he’d always loved, got his wish and some sterling casting for the role in Thomas Haden Church, fresh from Sideways. Given the pressure to make the story ever bigger and better, it’s not surprising that Harry Osbourne (James Franco) became a second villain, taking up his father’s mantle and becoming Green Goblin Mark II. He’d been around for two films already, he knew Spidey’s identity and he offered great dramatic material.
But the hero’s got to have his own internal dilemnas as well. With Peter Parker having first shouldered the great power that comes with great responsibility in the first film, and then turned away from it (temporarily) in the second (exactly the format of the Superman films as well, come to think of it), what’s left? Why, red kryptonite Spider-Man, that’s who, the Spider-Man who stops caring and trying to do the right thing. And with the addition of the alien symbiote black Spider-suit, that’s exactly what happened. Suddenly Peter Parker turned into a greasy haired, emo-looking playboy, and it’s all because of some black, crude-oil looking substance that eventually becomes Venom.
Ah, Venom. Yes, the third villain for whom there is emphatically no need in this film. The villain that Raimi had said, around the time the first film was released, that he didn’t like or want to use. The villain who’s ONLY there because the fanboys had been cheerleading for him and the studio listened to them and – so the story goes – insisted on his inclusion. The villain who appears, from the script, to have been thrown in at the last minute and to very little effect. The villain who could quite easily and profitably have been set up in the last act of Spidey 3 for a fourth film, instead of wasted in a momentary fight scene.
The fact is that this sort of appearance pisses everyone off. The fanboys are shortchanged, deprived of a real Spidey-vs.-Venom showdown by this blink-and-you’ll-miss-it fight scene, where the arachnid grudge match is diluted by the presence of Sandman and Green Goblin (and an eternally screaming MJ, of course). The filmmaker, Raimi, is presumably less than thrilled to have to cram in a character he doesn't particularly like. And the normal cinemagoers are shortchanged too, by a plot that strains itself to breaking point to cram this ugly space-mutant into the last act when there’s more than enough going on here already. The value of the great screenwriting maxim, K.I.S.S. – Keep It Simple, Stupid – has rarely been better demonstrated in its omission.
Admittedly, competing with Spidey 3 there is X-Men: The Last Stand, a film that also threw characters at a problem that didn’t exist (and really, was anyone clamouring for Callisto or Juggernaut?) and killed a franchise as a result. Which brings us to Wolverine…
SPOILERS FOLLOW IN NEXT 2 PARAGRAPHS
The fans wanted Deadpool? You got him. Gambit? Here ya go. Only thing is that, since they don’t really fit the story, we’re going to cram them in to short sequences. Gambit comes out of it OK. Deadpool, however… After a storming introduction to Ryan Reynolds as Wade Wilson early on in proceedings, he sits out the entire second act and turns up unrecognisable in the third – without his trademark quips, what with his MOUTH BEING SEWN SHUT, and with a whole raft of crazy mutant powers that make very little sense. And then he’s seen off in a finish that would require astonishing powers of rewrite to get around. So you get Deadpool, kinda, and Ryan Reynolds is all sorts of awesome as Wade Wilson for the time it takes to run to the loo and back, but then…that’s it, folks. And you can forget about a spin-off in this universe (DISCLAIMER: I’ve only seen one of the six post-credit stings. Maybe they bring him back in some implausible manner in one of the others).
It’s heartbreaking. Reynolds is as great in the role as the fans always knew he would be, but he’s tossed aside with barely a thought. The film crams in so many mutants that no one gets enough time. Quick, say hello to Bolt and Gambit and Agent Zero and Wade and Blob and Wraith and Emma Frost and Scott Summers and Weapon XI (kinda) as they all race past.
SPOILERS END
Here’s the thing. Filmmakers and studios need to stick to their guns and choose the characters that are best suited to the story and only the story, and if needs be ignore the fans when they ask for popular characters* to be included. Make a film that works, then find a story down the line to give those beloved characters room to strut their stuff; don't just cram 'em in willy-nilly. Fans need to think about what will work in the universe of the films: the fact is that Venom’s a less natural fit for Raimi’s Spider-verse than Sandman, and neither’s as good a fit as Green Goblin II.
If Wolverine fails at the box office, or worse, is received badly by fans, it won’t be because of the fiend who leaked it online. It will be because it’s a film that thinks it’s more important to tick off fan priorities on a checklist than to concentrate on a coherent story. God knows that Hugh Jackman and Gavin Hood and their team went into this determined to make a great film, and it’s clear they’ve strained every sinew (literally, in Jackman’s case) to do just that, but to the extent that they fail it’s because there’s just too damn much going on.
Seems to me that if you’re going to make a Wolverine film, that’s what you should make, not a film crammed to the gills with other mutants. And if you must award mutant cameos (because there’s fun to be had trying to spot familiar faces/ powers among the crowds) either beef them up to substantial parts or keep them at cameo level. There’s no honour in this name-checking approach, and no script that can support it. You can have about, oooh, five or six main characters interacting and still care. Even Christopher Nolan’s Batman films, with their substantial running times and incredibly sharp scripts, falter when they try to juggle too many more - and if they do add in extra characters, they make sure that those spares are not fanboy icons . Any more than that and somebody’s getting shortchanged. And if that somebody is Venom, or Deadpool, kiss a heck of a lot of fanboy goodwill goodbye.
*I’m pretty sure it says something that these particular characters are part of that late ‘80s / early ‘90s harder-edged Marvel. That either gives us a clue about the age of the internet fanboys most active in kicking up a stink, or says something wider about the way that fans are still in thrall to the darker, Moore-and-Miller influenced stuff.
1) Wade's crazy mutant powers were explained completely - that's one of the main reasons Stryker was capturing mutants and keeping them on the island - he was taking all their powers and putting them into Wade. It even shows him taking Cyclops' power and transferring it to Wade. (I also really like how it kind of made him a mutant version of Frankenstein.)
2) Deadpool has his mouth sewn shut because Stryker made the comment at the beginning that he'd be a "perfect soldier if it weren't for his mouth" (or something like that) - to me, that's pretty cool - he made the perfect soldier now.
Although I did have a couple of issues with the time periods (if James and Victor age so slowly, how could they have been so old in time for the Civil War, which was only about a decade or 2 after they were shown as little kids? - etc)
P.S. Yes, Hugh Jackman is very handsome, but that is NOT why I went to this film (in fact, I think he was overly muscular and don't like my men so veiny and muscular )
Don't dis men with healthy bodies!
What's wrong with a strong man who is healthy? Damn... I think some of you women want your men to be weak so you can kick em' around. hehe
I will always be fit!
Keep those gummies and cheesecake away from me...
Aiyeeee.....
*runs*
Enter your email address to join: