Would the pharmaceutical industry conceal a cure?

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
agree to disagree :duff (mine is fruits/veggies from the juicer)

I actually agree that a balanced diet along with exercise is definately a step in the right direction to living a healthy life. So there you go!

Now if you'll excuse me I'm off to Wendy's for some spicy chicken nuggets made from pink slime. :rock
 
uh huh

Aspartame is also known to cause alzheimer's...

Fluoride also does a good job in lowering IQ and making a person quite Docile..

I know its useless to try to get across anything to certain people on these forums

My understanding is that Alzheimer's is aluminum poisoning. People with Alzheimer's have higher concentrations of aluminum in their brains.

Aluminum cans, aluminum pots and pans, aluminum in antiperspirant, and aluminum in antacids.

Fluoride is a tranquilizer. It is also a pesticide. It prevents cavities by killing the bacteria in the mouth that secretes the acid that erodes tooth enamel. Fluoride is more toxic than lead and slightly less toxic than arsenic.

https://www.nofluoride.com/presentations/Fluoride Lead Arsenic Comparison.pdf



https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/814774-overview
 
Last edited:
Not worth the risk of being wrong imo, I'm going to apply this as a preventative measure just in case. Is it supposed to be piping hot straight out of the jug?

You could probably rig a Kuerig pot to just inject right up your ass!

:horror
 
Before you worry about big pharmaceutical, look to how big government stiffles innovation in research by the incredible hurdles put in the way of getting new drugs to market. That's why you pay so much and can't even volunteer to take experimental drugs - apparently the side effects may be worse than certain death!.

Unfortunately when you create an institution that if it allows a bad drug onto the market will be condemned, but gets no praise for letting good drugs get to market, it will inevitably show excessive caution.
 
Before you worry about big pharmaceutical, look to how big government stiffles innovation in research by the incredible hurdles put in the way of getting new drugs to market. That's why you pay so much and can't even volunteer to take experimental drugs - apparently the side effects may be worse than certain death!.

Unfortunately when you create an institution that if it allows a bad drug onto the market will be condemned, but gets no praise for letting good drugs get to market, it will inevitably show excessive caution.

The praise for good drugs comes in the form of $$$ for big pharma. It's not that "big gov" stiffles innovation, instead, it's that they are suppose to be protecting you from potentially harmful drugs that could do more damage than good. Look up fen fen and see what happened there. Checks and balances is all. If you want deregulation for big pharma, then prepare for some serious side effects to your health. Unlike what some here may think, big pharma is not looking out for your health and well being, they are looking out for your wallet. I'm not saying that drugs don't have their place. They definately do, and have helped many people. But to think that big pharma is looking out for you health and well-being more than they are looking for profit is a bit naive. Its all about the benjamins for these drug companies- your health is secondary.
 
Last edited:
Before you worry about big pharmaceutical, look to how big government stiffles innovation in research by the incredible hurdles put in the way of getting new drugs to market. That's why you pay so much and can't even volunteer to take experimental drugs - apparently the side effects may be worse than certain death!.

Unfortunately when you create an institution that if it allows a bad drug onto the market will be condemned, but gets no praise for letting good drugs get to market, it will inevitably show excessive caution.


About half of the drugs that the FDA approves are later taken off of the market because they are too toxic. That is of course AFTER new drugs have been invented to replace them. Then THOSE drugs are found too toxic and taken off the market when new drugs are invented. And so on.
There is a revolving door between the FDA and the boards of major pharmaceutical companies. People sit on the boards of the drug companies, then they head the FDA. Then they go back to sitting on the boards of the major drug companies. Thus, these big drug companies basically make their own rules, determining what drugs are safe enough to bring to market, and then take them off of the market when they have a new replacement drug, when the patent of the first drug is about to run out.
 
What argument? All I hear are a whole lot of arbitrary assertions being piled on top of each other. I'm not dumb enough to think that's something that deserves refutation.

Are you?

Just messing with you 76. But do you really think that big pharma is really looking out for you and your health over revenue, cash flow and profit? Wouldn't you agree that big pharma needs the existance of disease, pain and suffering in order to continue to make money and stay profitable? Just answer me, yes or no.
 
Last edited:
About half of the drugs that the FDA approves are later taken off of the market because they are too toxic. That is of course AFTER new drugs have been invented to replace them. Then THOSE drugs are found too toxic and taken off the market when new drugs are invented. And so on.
There is a revolving door between the FDA and the boards of major pharmaceutical companies. People sit on the boards of the drug companies, then they head the FDA. Then they go back to sitting on the boards of the major drug companies. Thus, these big drug companies basically make their own rules, determining what drugs are safe enough to bring to market, and then take them off of the market when they have a new replacement drug, when the patent of the first drug is about to run out.
:goodpost::exactly: It's pretty scary. Not all drugs are bad, but not all drugs are good either. My guess there are probably more bad than good.
 
Of course they would! What's the last goddamned illness they managed to cure?!?! For them it's all about finding a way that you can live with whatever illness - having to treat an illness for your whole life taking their products is a hell of a lot more profitable.
 
Of course they would! What's the last goddamned illness they managed to cure?!?! For them it's all about finding a way that you can live with whatever illness - having to treat an illness for your whole life taking their products is a hell of a lot more profitable.

My point :exactly:
 
I don't get sick,have no disease and why?

because I juice fruits and vegatables,take vitamins,and provide my body nutrients to keep my Immune system very strong....I don't need to go to a doctor,because I never get sick

my daily Vitamin D (supplemented or from the Sun) is my flu shot and is the TRUE preventor and Flu Stopper! (not your Mercury,puss filled,Government love shot that contains a live flu virus)

I stop drinking soda 3 years ago,I also got AWARE of the junk that sits on the grocery store shelves (high fructose corny syrup is a high concentrated fake sugar,hugely responsible for diabetes and heart disease).I do not buy products that has HFCS...

Even since I started juicing daily for over a year+ now,I have lost 23 lbs......eating right clearly works,and as my own example,clearly shows that if you eat right,give your body "proper" nutrition,you will not develop disease and can live a long,healthy life...I will always stand for Nutitional therapy for REAL healing.
 
Back
Top