fuzzylojiks
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2010
- Messages
- 8,200
- Reaction score
- 0
I personally see my collection fall into a few category of sizes; There's life-size(1:1), extra large statues(1:2), large statues(1:3), medium statues (1:4 / 1:5), small statues and large figures (1:6), medium figures(1:12) , and small figures (3 3/4th inchers). That's plenty of variation of sizes. The problem with the "medium statue" category is that it's shared by two scales and that splits the roster right in half if you're trying to collect and display a full team. It would have been fine if 1:5 is small enough to be in it's own size category, but IMO it's way too similar to 1:4, except just slightly off... It's like when you see a life-size bust that the head is obviously too small, you can call it (1.8 :1) scale but in the end it's just an off scale...
Take a look at how the scale changes exponentially; every time you split the size in half, the difference gets smaller and smaller. That's why (1:8), (1:9) , (1:10) , (1:11) aren't standard sizes, cause splitting those sizes in halves make too little of a difference to really matter, you would have to skip all the way from (1:6) to (1:12) just to half the height.
(1:5) scale is right at the midpoint of the division where people debate whether it's small enough to be in it's own category, or if it's actually just an off scale to (1:4).
-
I agree, keep it to 1/6 and 1/4 scale, there is no need for another whole scale. Then at least the 1/6 can match up with Bowens and the 1/4 can go with the PFs. They actually tried to come up with 1/5 scale to double dip on characters.