X-Men: Apocalypse - May 27, 2016

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Don't think age would be relevant with Mr. Sinister, let alone a CBM.


But I don't think Cranston would be the first to come to mind for Sinister. Quite honestly I feel his current campaigns are based from fans of BB. I admire the show but I don't think it merits every potential role; like during the Luthor rumors.
 
General public doesn't know diddley poo about Sinister, the character itself isn't all that important to be treated in any particular way in the grant scheme of things, and Cranston is as good an actor as you'll run across. So. . .make it so.
 
This Cranston situation just reminded me of Crapzilla 2014. That puketastic borefest of a film haunts me everywhere...
 
This Cranston situation just reminded me of Crapzilla 2014. That puketastic borefest of a film haunts me everywhere...

He was awful in it. I literally had to cover my face in embarrassment during this scene.

PMH51Gh.jpg
 
I just went through a list of villains in my head and the only 2 I think Cranston would be fit well in is Norman Osbourne and Dr. Connors. Since Marvel is now helping with Spidey, it's possible for him to play either role now.
 
Godzilla is a Japanese franchise and overacting is a big part of it. :lol
Regardless, you can't deny that his character and acting were miles better than everyone else's.

Also, he should play Master Mold. :monkey3
 
Oh I'm not denying he was the only "actor" in the film. He was the only one that stuck out at all.

Hard to say who he could play. As for Mr. Sinister, that's a no go considering he should be in Apocalypse and he isn't. Unless, Apocalpyse doesn't get killed in this and he shows up in a later sequel in the next trilogy.
 
I don’t want Bryan Cranston anywhere near this franchise. He’s much more suited to play a MCU villain.
 
Back
Top