Yea, I get it, you don't judge a movie at all until you've seen it. You go and see anything no matter how complete **** it looks and how terrible the franchise track record is. And only then, after Jason X has your $23, do you formulate an opinion that Jason in Space probably wasn't a great idea.
The track record for this franchise isn't terrible though, and the only things that "look like complete ****" so far from this film are a few goofy costume designs.
Then maybe you should actually form an opinion next time, instead of claiming the film is "bad" as if it's a commonly known fact, even though the film isn't even out yet.
Everyone forms an opinion before they see it, otherwise they wouldn't think it looks good enough to see "genius".
I have no problems with you guys thinking this movie will suck, it’s more of your reasons for it. Every thread is filled with ranting about comic book accuracy determining whether a movie will suck or not. I don’t know if you liked First Class, but a lot of people did and it is considered by many the best X-Men movie yet (I think X-2), and it couldn’t have strayed any further from the comics.
This franchise has had 6 movies, with only two actually and factually sucking, when they were directed by subpar directors. This movie has a great cast, good director who started the franchise, and it probably has the biggest budget ever for a superhero movie. There is a lot to be optimistic about, yet on here, the only thing that seems to matter is whether Wolverine will finally wear his mask or not
I have no problems with you guys thinking this movie will suck, it’s more of your reasons for it. Every thread is filled with ranting about comic book accuracy determining whether a movie will suck or not. I don’t know if you liked First Class, but a lot of people did and it is considered by many the best X-Men movie yet (I think X-2), and it couldn’t have strayed any further from the comics.
This franchise has had 6 movies, with only two actually and factually sucking, when they were directed by subpar directors. This movie has a great cast, good director who started the franchise, and it probably has the biggest budget ever for a superhero movie. There is a lot to be optimistic about, yet on here, the only thing that seems to matter is whether Wolverine will finally wear his mask or not
Um.... you're on a forum chalk full of comic nerds. If you can't see how that'd contribute to people *****ing about goofyassed costumes that don't really put the character in a good light, um... well.... DING! Fries Ready!
Wolverine is the one that time travels, exists in both worlds, knows everyone, has the "mission", is in like every scene we've seen so far wheres theres X-men based on stills etc. He's the main character in both of Singer's X-films. Toad, Striker is back again for the billionth time. Rogue was in 3 movies, a central X-Man, they wrote her a role so dumb it doesn't even remotely affect the film if it's cut and that sounds like a good sign for the writing? Singer hasn't directed a good movie in 11 years. 11 years. Jack The Giant Slayer had a massive budget as well, what good did that do?
Much like Robocop, I think it's funny that the people making the movie are so inept and out of touch, they think the material they are bombarding us with is helping them. If you don't see the humor in a magazine running off 25 variant covers of one issue to show off these terrible costume designs, you're probably one of those *******s who bought all 25 and prevented anyone else from getting a copy at the local newstand.
Really? It's pretty ****ing clear Wolverine's taking point where Kitty did in the comic version.
We already know this much from the trailers.
I highly doubt that for the sake of action figures and Bryan loving a shirtless Hugh Jackman.
Have you ever read Days of Future Past?
