X-Men: Days of Future Past

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
That BODY double actress is known for her appearances in other films. Is it it speculation, sure, but I BET it is.

All right, that's all I was trying to determine, whether or not this was an educated guess or was it revealed in some documentary or interview somewhere that it was point blank a double/stuntwoman/CGI whatever. I know doubles are often used (especially if this was a pickup shot as you say) but I also know that actors can make dramatic transformations (which Hathaway has already proven she is capable of) and that certain wardrobe accessories can be just as dramatic as well. Sounds like it could go either way without any emphatic determination one way or the other.

I'm not sure why Snadinator keeps carrying on about my notion that Singer is likely the primary reason for X:FC not being as good as it could have been when I never actually responded to someone's question with "yup, it's official" as some of you originally did regarding the Catwoman scene.

And what's funny is that I was perfectly fine carrying on about X:FC and X2 until Nam had to obsessively make TDKR the center of every thread he posts in. :lol
 
Last edited:
Nah, with Khev, that "official" remark only goes one way. And even if you provided something, he'd argue about the date. "I know that documentary is official, but I heard it from someone a decade ago, who read it in an interview in a magazine I don't remember the name of, so that's what I'm gonna stick by, since it's older." :lol

Oh I really wouldn't bring up that prior discussion you lost if I were you. The Empire Strikes Back (1980,) Gary Kurtz (IGN interview, 2002) and George Lucas (Annotated Screenplays, 1997) all contradict that one recent publication you are apparently living and dying by. I'd think you'd do better to go back to licking your wounds in private. :wave
 
Oh I really wouldn't bring up that prior discussion you lost if I were you. The Empire Strikes Back (1980,) Gary Kurtz (IGN interview, 2002) and George Lucas (Annotated Screenplays, 1997) all contradict that one recent publication you are apparently living and dying by. I'd think you'd do better to go back to licking your wounds in private. :wave

I didn't lose it. You're the one who was incapable of grasping the concept of Leia being the "other" Skywalker in ESB. But keep playing ":ignore:" if you must. :lol
 
Body double or no... hindsight is def 20/20 here! Let's just all agree to agree on this one.
 
Body double or no... hindsight is def 20/20 here! Let's just all agree to agree on this one.

What if it's Nolan in a girdle and a wig? While that thought is completely disgusting I'm sure I've given void, ZaCH and possibly Lambo, an extra excuse to whack to it. :gah:
 
What if it's Nolan in a girdle and a wig?

Confirmed.

littleknownfactnolan.jpg
 
These are some great casting choices for these characters

https://themovieuniverse.wordpress.com/2012/11/30/x-men-characters-i-want-to-see-on-the-big-screen/

Man, i'm so anxious to see how the timelines will interact. Having them face to face wouldn't work imo, it'd be best to have the future timeline scenes for the first half and then the first class timeline for the second half or move back and forth between timelines but keep the characters seperate.

I'd love to see Rachel Summers in the future timeline as the daughter of Scott and Jean and have Wolverine killed by being blasted to ashes like in the comic.

With so many great actors i really hope Wolverine doesn't hog all the screentime like in X1-3
 
Last edited:
Just when I was about to sing "We Are The World" to that thing!

:gah:

I suppose in the age of RuPaul anything is possible. :(

Just give it up Frank. You can't even post a "let's all agree to agree" about a beautiful woman without Nam being able to resist his overriding compulsion to steer the discussion back to his favorite topic: male homosexuality.

We all have umpteen movies we gush about; the SW OT, LOTR, Terminator, the Avengers, even me with Prometheus. But just watch how in damn near every thread Nam has to find a way to be the first to bring up his favorite two obsessions, TDKR and male homosexuality. I'm serious. Make a note to keep an eye on what people are talking about and what Nam "contributes" to the discussions from here on out.
 
Just give it up Frank. You can't even post a "let's all agree to agree" about a beautiful woman without Nam being able to resist his overriding compulsion to steer the discussion back to his favorite topic: male homosexuality.

We all have umpteen movies we gush about; the SW OT, LOTR, Terminator, the Avengers, even me with Prometheus. But just watch how in damn near every thread Nam has to find a way to be the first to bring up his favorite two obsessions, TDKR and male homosexuality. It's really quite excessive.

gay_c9ac3a_1102899.jpg
 
I'm not saying that he isn't allowed to be into those things of course, it'd just be nice if he at least kept them confined to their respective threads. :monkey1
 
Anne Hathaway is a beautiful woman?

Nam's a gay boi?



Only one of these things can be true. DECIDE Khev, and choose wisely.
 
I didn't say he was gay. I said his two favorite topics are TDKR and male homosexuality. You said he was gay.

And nice to see you come around on the gif Frank and I were talking about indeed being Hathaway (she was the "beautiful woman" we were agreeing to agree on). ;)

But I'm serious, keep note anytime you see male homosexuality referenced in a thread as to who brought it up from here on out.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top