Should I update my SS version with this?
Probably a good idea.
Should I update my SS version with this?
but I'll be borrowing a friends this week and will get comparison pics up.
Those previous photos look like they're of a guy in a suit!
Still gonna wait for the inevitible Empire Boba though.
yeah, I get mine for cheaper than Sideshow's price
Honestly, I have no problems with him. I've owned every single 1/6th Fett and this version blows them all away.
Is that stock? First I've seen the proportions look good.
It looks like HT made the scratches look like...well....real scratches and battle damage. IMO, the ROTJ screen used helmet's scratches looked TOO painted on and less like actual damage. The ESB helmet's battle damage looks much, much better...both in placement and execution. I think HT showed good judgement in making their figure's helmet with scratches that looked better than the prop.Does anyone know what reference HT used for their helmet weathering/scratches paint? The scratches on Fett's helmet are a bit like fingerprints - distinguishing the couple of different costume helmets seen onscreen and actually forming part of the likeness.
Despite using Kermit green as a base color and the sculpt being a bit iffy, SSC actually did a decent job of fairly closely matching the ESB helmet scratch pattern on their 1/6 Boba.
Neither this 1/6 HT Fett helmet nor the 1/4 HT Fett helmet match the ROTJ screen-used helmets (there were a few used, but one was used 90% of the time.) There seems to have been some attempt to match the chest armor scrapes (not great, but close in places) yet no effort at all with the helmet, which is surprising for HT.
I'm wondering if there's a a non screen-used helmet they used as reference? It's just a bit weird for them not to make some attempt to match the ROTJ helmet seen on screen.
It looks like HT made the scratches look like...well....real scratches and battle damage. IMO, the ROTJ screen used helmet's scratches looked TOO painted on and less like actual damage. The ESB helmet's battle damage looks much, much better...both in placement and execution. I think HT showed good judgement in making their figure's helmet with scratches that looked better than the prop.
You're thimking about the SSC one, aren't you.Is that stock? First I've seen the proportions look good.
Honestly onscreen Bossk is quite terrible, he wasn't done with any precision couse he is onscreen just for a few seconds. Boba is the similar case. Nobody predicted he will become such favorite character so i would not take any details on him as 100% intended. So any tweaks or small changes on the figures are ok for me.
As with comments on the sculpt I'd love to see comparison photos with the prop to see how HT's is different. I love the HT Fett and nothing will stop it looking amazing to me but it would be interesting to see what people are talking about when they say it's not accurate, even though the bottom line is that these are toys not prop replicas.
The one thing that stands out that HT definitely got wrong was the T-visor.
The horizontal slit has still got that curved look that SSC added as well.
The Medi helmet still trumps them both.
I've owned the two Medi's and they were both super fragile and just looked too small. I'll agree the helmet was shaped well but I also remember it had a damn near orange color on the visor, instead of the maroonish color that it's supposed to be.
As far as the detail scratches go, you're definitely in the wrong hobby if you want 1/6th figures 100% screen accurate. I know that's what alot of people want, but I'm not as critical as others because I'm aware of how much work it is to try and replicate and mass produce all these little details, that some guy did a rush job on in 1978, just to get the props pumped out in time for filming.
And this is coming from someone who took 3 years to build a 501st worthy ROTJ Boba Fett As far as I'm concerned, this Fett and Sideshow Bossk next to each other cannot be beat.
Enter your email address to join: