And I'd like to ask all the board freaks who defiantly said the killings were not related to Batman yesterday, to come back on and discuss this now? Any suggestion that this creep was actually a Batman freak was aggressively dismissed by them. Well, turns out he was.
Well, firstly I am sceptical of blame placed on passive entertainment that is not meant as a propaganda vehicle. If any pop culture medium actually encourages, or at least desensitises us to violence, it would be video games. In them you actively choose to make the violence happen, and in sandbox games, you can often do some pretty evil ____ of your own volition. A film, in contrast, is just someone else's story brought to life at the end of the day.
Regarding this specific case, this guy is more in line with those people who have a creepy obsession with Joker, most particularly the Ledger Joker. Even some far left critic who thinks Batman is a 'fascist' would be forced to admit that wanton killing completely contrary to Batman's ethos. Now Nolan pushed that envelope a bit with his utterly reckless Tumbler escape in the first film (but Alfred reassured us all that no one died and gave Bruce deserved criticism). It is the Joker and his nihilistic vision of humanity that would be reflected in real mass murder.
So is Nolan to blame? He ultimately just presents different facets of evil in him films which contrast with his hero. Is that any different than traditional folklore and fairy tales?
By the way the murderer apparently has a Ron Burgundy poster in his apartment. How f___ed up is that? But that means a silly, innocuous comedy appealed to this guy as well.