Tryin' to make a good film around limitations is what makes these films good to begin with. If James Cameron could use CGI back in early 80's we'd get Terminator Gaynesys instead of one of the best sci fi thrillers ever made.
Agreed... Cameron would blow his CGI load all over The Terminator if he made it today.
He did give us T2 which was a good mix. But now, it's just easier to do it which a cheap CG artist.
But T1 is Sooooo much better
F/X have nothing to do with that though. T1 is just a perfect film. T2 is good though just not near as good as T1
How many times did good movies were ruined by bad effects
Bad effects can limit and ruined a directors vision
I think T1 is a great example of bad F/X not ruining a good movie. Some of F/X for Arnolds head when he was taking out his eye are pretty bad.. Even back then.. The T-800 is obviously stop motion and the Future scenes have some bad dummies in the back of cars.. But none of that effects the film. A great film should be able to stand on its own.
But I am sure there are some good films that may have been hurt by bad effects.. I just can;t think of any off the top of my head.
Instantly thought of this also....
It’s been shown time and time again that the reason Jaws worked so well is how little they showed the shark....
A Jaws remake, even now, would be tragic....might as well remake The Godfather also....
I think they showed the wolf the perfect amount....which is to say, you wanted to see more......
Same with Jaws....
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Exactly!!!!!!