Avengers: Endgame

[guyver1]

Re: Avengers: Endgame (April 26th, 2019)

I read an article where some mathmatician calculated the accident related deaths that would be attributable to The Snap. It was something along the lines of 1.2 million deaths from transportation related accidents alone. More due to infrastructure collapse of clean water, power, and food when half the people supporting those industries disappear and the other half are in mourning.

But where the real disaster would come is after the 2nd snap that brought everyone back to life. After 5 years resource production would probably start to stabilize again to adjust for there only being 3.8 billion people left alive. Suddenly there are twice as many people on earth as there are resources to support them.

Boy, someone who took the time to figure all that out must have a lot of free time on their hands

 

[ShadowX81]

Re: Avengers: Endgame (April 26th, 2019)

Boy, someone who took the time to figure all that out must have a lot of free time on their hands

Wasn't that hard actually. At any given time there are 2 million people traveling by plane. With a 50% kill rate that means 25% of planes lost both pilots. 500,000 right there.

There are also 150 million people on the road at any given time. Killing 50% of them and even taking a very conservative estimate that only 1% of people left on roads die from the resulting accidents, that brings us up to 1.2 million.

 

[ZE_501]

Re: Avengers: Endgame (April 26th, 2019)

I read an article where some mathmatician calculated the accident related deaths that would be attributable to The Snap. It was something along the lines of 1.2 million deaths from transportation related accidents alone. More due to infrastructure collapse of clean water, power, and food when half the people supporting those industries disappear and the other half are in mourning.

But where the real disaster would come is after the 2nd snap that brought everyone back to life. After 5 years resource production would probably start to stabilize again to adjust for there only being 3.8 billion people left alive. Suddenly there are twice as many people on earth as there are resources to support them.

He left out an important variable!

Bruce Banner is a genius and would have factored all of the reality-bending necessary when he enacted the...


HULK SNAP!!


(See what I did there?)

 

[Robopredinator]

Re: Avengers: Endgame (April 26th, 2019)

But that's 2 million people who travel by plane over the course of the entire day. How many airline passengers are in the air during the time of the snap?

 

[jye4ever]

Re: Avengers: Endgame (April 26th, 2019)

That's a big reason I like the idea of the MCU being finished after EG. There's just so much additional aftermath to the snap and subsequent return of the dusted people that I seriously doubt will be properly addressed in SMFFH and the rest Phase 4.

I have a feeling that Phase 4 will more or less act like everything is somehow back to normal apart from the deaths of Stark and Widow and Cap's retirement.

That’s a great point they could make an entire series just based on superheros trying to restore social order back into the world and also deal with the humanitarian and infrastructure devastation crisis not just from the snap but also from the reverse snap.

Meanwhile the MCU can focus on Wolverine vs Hulk.

 

[Khev]

Re: Avengers: Endgame (April 26th, 2019)

Yep, lol.

 

[guyver1]

Re: Avengers: Endgame (April 26th, 2019)

There’s an interesting theory I saw on YouTube .

What if Cap did the Gauntlet snap instead of Tony. Analysts say Cap might survive because of the Super Soldier Serum

Your thoughts

 

[jye4ever]

Re: Avengers: Endgame (April 26th, 2019)

If CM or SW both who were created by infinity stones and Thor couldn’t do it then Cap is out of the question, no way.

Only gamma boy could handle the absorption of energy.

 

[JAWS]

Re: Avengers: Endgame (April 26th, 2019)

If CM or SW both who were created by infinity stones and Thor couldn’t do it then Cap is out of the question, no way.

Only gamma boy could handle the absorption of energy.

Trying to figure out why you are here and not posting your opinion about Godzilla..

Hmmmm.. Could be a bad sign.

 

[Khev]

Re: Avengers: Endgame (April 26th, 2019)

There’s an interesting theory I saw on YouTube .

What if Cap did the Gauntlet snap instead of Tony. Analysts say Cap might survive because of the Super Soldier Serum

Your thoughts

The writers of the film said point blank that "Cap would have been toast." He might have been able to hang on a few more minutes longer than Tony after snapping his fingers because of the serum but the end result would have still been the same.

 

[Yondu_toys]

Re: Avengers: Endgame (April 26th, 2019)

The writers of the film said point blank that "Cap would have been toast." He might have been able to hang on a few more minutes longer than Tony after snapping his fingers because of the serum but the end result would have still been the same.

Oh yeah he would have been. The only reason he was able to take direct hits from thanos was because he had the power of Thor running through him. I don't even think he'd have been able to do the snap. Tony's suit absorbed all of the gauntlets power while he was talkin that $#!+ to Thanos, otherwise he probably would've died on the spot.


Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

 

[ZE_501]

Re: Avengers: Endgame (April 26th, 2019)

Cap, Scarlet Witch, Captain Marvel ... none of them had pixie dust -- sorry I meant nano-tech -- to swipe the stones and configure them into a snappy gauntlet.

 

[a-dev]

Re: Avengers: Endgame (April 26th, 2019)

I read an article where some mathmatician calculated the accident related deaths that would be attributable to The Snap. It was something along the lines of 1.2 million deaths from transportation related accidents alone. More due to infrastructure collapse of clean water, power, and food when half the people supporting those industries disappear and the other half are in mourning.

But where the real disaster would come is after the 2nd snap that brought everyone back to life. After 5 years resource production would probably start to stabilize again to adjust for there only being 3.8 billion people left alive. Suddenly there are twice as many people on earth as there are resources to support them.

Damn...they could do some great stuff with all that. But as I think Khev alluded to earlier, are they likely to?...

Trying to figure out why you are here and not posting your opinion about Godzilla..

Hmmmm.. Could be a bad sign.

He's preparing his monster post in another tab I expect. That's what I'd be doing

 

[guyver1]

Re: Avengers: Endgame (April 26th, 2019)

Cap, Scarlet Witch, Captain Marvel ... none of them had pixie dust -- sorry I meant nano-tech -- to swipe the stones and configure them into a snappy gauntlet.

Was the Mark 85 more powerful than Mark 50

We have to think Tony had 5 years since his last beat down by Thanos , the MK 85 didn’t look like it had as many weapons as MK 50

 

[Yondu_toys]

Re: Avengers: Endgame (April 26th, 2019)

Was the Mark 85 more powerful than Mark 50

We have to think Tony had 5 years since his last beat down by Thanos , the MK 85 didn’t look like it had as many weapons as MK 50

Tony made adjustments to every suit to adapt to something new. So we have to assume it was.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

 

[The Clown Prince of Crime]

Re: Avengers: Endgame (April 26th, 2019)

There’s an interesting theory I saw on YouTube .

What if Cap did the Gauntlet snap instead of Tony. Analysts say Cap might survive because of the Super Soldier Serum

Your thoughts

The writers of the film said point blank that "Cap would have been toast." He might have been able to hang on a few more minutes longer than Tony after snapping his fingers because of the serum but the end result would have still been the same.

It's Russo Cap. He can take it all day. He might not even get Hulk's tiny arm syndrome.

 

[ZE_501]

Re: Avengers: Endgame (April 26th, 2019)

Was the Mark 85 more powerful than Mark 50

We have to think Tony had 5 years since his last beat down by Thanos , the MK 85 didn’t look like it had as many weapons as MK 50

It stealthily pulled the Infinity Stones out of an actively wielded gauntlet and protected him long enough to be able to use them. Offhand I'd say its power level was over 9000.

 

[guyver1]

Re: Avengers: Endgame (April 26th, 2019)

It stealthily pulled the Infinity Stones out of an actively wielded gauntlet and protected him long enough to be able to use them. Offhand I'd say its power level was over 9000.

But he got jacked up by a past Thanos that didn’t even have the Gauntlet

 

[ZE_501]

Re: Avengers: Endgame (April 26th, 2019)

But he got jacked up by a past Thanos that didn’t even have the Gauntlet

Thanos without the Gauntlet is still one of the most dangerous foes the Avengers have ever faced. Nice to have a credible threat.

(WHY am I still awake and nerding out?)

 

[guyver1]

Re: Avengers: Endgame (April 26th, 2019)

Thanos without the Gauntlet is still one of the most dangerous foes the Avengers have ever faced. Nice to have a credible threat.

(WHY am I still awake and nerding out?)

Well in the MCU..the word Now is “ had “

One got beheaded the other got dusted

Makes no sense, in the comics, Thanos is alive and kicking