- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 32,452
- Reaction score
- 3,162
Actually DiFabio, Keaton batman does have weathering on his shoes. And there's nothing toylike about his PERS eyes as far as I'm concerned. Not all Hot Toys figures are created equal, but for $600 I don't think it's unreasonable to expect a batmobile that matches DX09 Batman in terms of detail and realism.
Admire the remarkable sculpting and paintwork in his gloves and boots, and compare that to the soft, simplistic wheels and rims of the car. Notice the super fine details in the clip of his utility belt, then look at the soft, undefined lines etched into the black on the side of the car. Look at the little beveled edges and sharp lines of his batarang that catch the light, absent in the detailing cut into the top of the car.
There's plenty to love, for sure. The dashboard, like you mentioned. The silver engine parts in the sides of the car. The little ventilation grills inside the "trunk". But all in all, the car is nowhere near the caliber of the figures.
You've seen that image comparing the little red rockets on the original ED-209 figure's arm to the new version? The batmobile to me is kind of like that original version; all the pieces are there, but they're not nearly as developed as they could be.
Yeah, but even then, the Batman figure had that PERS panel on the back of his head, didn't have a layered, complex suit like the film and didn't have a belt that was as detailed or as functional as the prototype. You mention the batarang, that sucker didn't even fold! The grapple gun? The spear grapple wasn't even removable.
I'd say they're about on par as details go.
Heck, I agree about the steering wheel and the seats but then I think about that detailed dash with those lights, the instrument panels or the paint wash on the discolored after burner that makes it look like flames have shot out of it before or even the browning machine guns with the intricate details, paint apps and movable features. It's give and take really.