Dark_Knight_89
Super Freak
I'd say Burton's Batman was more "gothic/noir" than really a period film.
I don't think Prince released any music in 1937?
I'd say Burton's Batman was more "gothic/noir" than really a period film.
I'd say Burton's Batman was more "gothic/noir" than really a period film.
Definitely - nicely put. I can convey things well usually, but although there are period elements to the aesthetic, you've nailed it man. Those descriptors should've been in my mind immediately.I'd say Burton's Batman was more "gothic/noir" than really a period film.
Oh 100% man, absolutely!! That's exactly what I'd love too!Yeah, exactly. I mean there are 1930s/1940s dates, weapons, cars and clothing, but there's also 1980s qualities as well.
What I'd like to see is a straight up 1930s/40s film. No aesthetics, no styles. Batman in the setting he originated in. And not stylized and clean like Captain America (you know, that world fair type world) either. Just a gritty, grey 1930s Gotham City.
Yeah, exactly. I mean there are 1930s/1940s dates, weapons, cars and clothing, but there's also 1980s qualities as well.
I don't know who said it but the Gotham in 1989 and the animated series was described as "what if the depression lasted another 50 years". It sort of merged the 1940s and 1980s together. That's why some televisions and screens were in color (Batman's console, the Joker's television) while others were in black and white. Essentially the Burton and Animated Gotham's are "timeless" even if they have dates that contradict (some papers are from the 30s/40s, some dates are from the 80s/90s).
What I'd like to see is a straight up 1930s/40s film. No aesthetics, no styles. Batman in the setting he originated in. And not stylized and clean like Captain America (you know, that world fair type world) either. Just a gritty, grey 1930s Gotham City.
Sequels could span for the next 40-50 years. Batman and his war on crime during the 50s, batman and his war on crime during the 60s, etc. etc.
What I'd like to see is a straight up 1930s/40s film. No aesthetics, no styles. Batman in the setting he originated in. And not stylized and clean like Captain America (you know, that world fair type world) either. Just a gritty, grey 1930s Gotham City.
Sequels could span for the next 40-50 years. Batman and his war on crime during the 50s, batman and his war on crime during the 60s, etc. etc.
"You're a detective?"
"Part time."
I'd say Burton's Batman was more "gothic/noir" than really a period film.
Harley Quinn is one of those characters that people either love or hate. I rarely find someone in the middle. There are some Batman fans who still recent her being transferred from B:TAS into the universe (even though I personally love her, at times more than The Joker). I'm not shocked she isn't in a film yet but I have a feeling the next time we see The Joker in a Batman film she'll probably be in tow.
Wouldnt it be great to see a David Fincher rendition of Arkham Asylum
I wanna see a Dr seuss redition of Arkham.
That said though, as I suggested earlier, a bulletproof cape would solve all of that and be a great opportunity for some classic poses with the cape held in front of his face, draped over his forearm.
Wouldnt it be great to see a David Fincher rendition of Arkham Asylum
I'd be fine with that in terms of explaining away stopping bullets in a comic movie. But for informational purposes - in real life, how well would that work? Say the cape was 100% kevlar (not sure if that's even a possibility) - would the bullets' momentum push the draped cape into him with enough force to injure him? I assume if the cape was draped over his forearm, and it hit the cape that was draped on the forearm, it could still break bones even without puncturing skin?
Again, if these dangers are still present, I'd still be cool with this as a way of Batman being "armored".
It would be more like those lead blankets they lay over you before getting an X-Ray.
Enter your email address to join: