- Joined
- May 31, 2011
- Messages
- 19,881
- Reaction score
- 288
Bad Ass. It definitely could (and should).I still think white eyes would work in a live-action film.
Skinned pink lion.
Bad Ass. It definitely could (and should).I still think white eyes would work in a live-action film.
Skinned pink lion.
Oh look, Superman just destroyed a building like he does in the comics and cartoons, but lets complain and cry about it when they do it in a live action film
Can't wait to see Cavill donkey punch Gadot.
Don't you know? There are things that work in the comics that don't work on the big screen
I don't see him as a female abuser, that's WW after all.
Maybe she gets off on it.
Can't wait to see Cavill punch Gadot.
Warner Bros.' intent to build a DC Comics-based superhero film world to rival Marvel Studios has been clear for a while now, and in an interview with The Hollywood Reporter, Greg Silverman, WB's President, Creative Development and Worldwide Production, shared his thoughts -- albeit vaguely -- on the difference between DC and Marvel's approaches to franchise-building.
"We have a great strategy for the DC films, which is to take these beloved characters and put them in the hands of master filmmakers and make sure they all coordinate with each other," Silverman told THR. "You'll see the difference when you see 'Batman v Superman,' 'Suicide Squad,' 'Justice League' and all the things that we are working on."
Silverman opened up a bit more when addressing the darker tone recent DC-based films have been known for, starting with Christopher Nolan's "Dark Knight" trilogy and continuing into 2013's "Man of Steel" (the first entry into a new shared DC movie continuity) and early promotional material for next year's "Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice." (In contrast, Marvel Studios President of Production Kevin Feige was recently quoted as saying Marvel's films will never take a "dark turn.")
"There is intensity and a seriousness of purpose to some of these characters," Silverman said. "The filmmakers who are tackling these properties are making great movies about superheroes; they aren't making superhero movies. And when you are trying to make a good movie, you tackle interesting philosophies and character development. There's also humor, which is an important part."
When talking the Gal Gadot-starring "Wonder Woman" film planned for 2017, Silverman said that though the top two contenders to direct were Michelle MacLaren (the studio's original choice) and Patty Jenkins (who is now set to direct the feature), it wasn't specifically a search for a female director. "It was never about the best female director," Silverman said. Silverman also defended the decision to have multiple writers working on the "Wonder Woman" screenplay simultaneously. "In the case of 'Wonder Woman,' the right approach was to have writers pitching different scenes within the framework we created," he said.
All that sounds pretty good, also James Wan will be directing Aquaman, more good news imo.
Wow! Awesome!
err.... Who is he?
I still think white eyes would work in a live-action film.
After the abysmal creative failure of Man of Steel, they should be worried about making a single good movie. Here's hoping they find a way to pull it off.I love how they are worried more about making great movies, than making decent action flicks for the summer.
After the abysmal creative failure of Man of Steel, they should be worried about making a single good movie. Here's hoping they find a way to pull it off.
Enter your email address to join: