The Clown Prince of Crime
Super Freak
In the R version we'll see the nips.
That should raise the % on RT.
In the R version we'll see the nips.
That should raise the % on RT.
I preferred the jar of urine.
The % of No Thanks?
Really, I thought she looked hot in this movie, well..her body anyways...her face looked a little worn out.
It's amazing when you realize that it's only your opinion that matters. No body is unbiased and that's fine its human nature but if you are a paid critic and it's your job I expect you neutral. I finally realized they were nothing but hypocrites when star wars came out . The love that movie got even though it was a recycled version of the previous 3 movies was a so on your face even the movie acknowledged it in itself, what is this like the death star no man this is 3 times bigger. It's was predictable I could not belive what I was watching
Yet how many reviews mention that next to none.
So make up your own mind it's that simple because if you think these paid critics are being honest they are not they are flawed like the rest of us.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I537 using Tapatalk
I hope you've got time, cause it's a big one! It's about 3 pages or so back.
Yeah I would have liked it had I not seen the previous and this movie is a sequel to those movies so we could not excuse ourselves from them. I have not seen BvS but I am at least happy about one thing this time around that a majority of the negative reviews are aimed at the structure narative of the movie and not at the tone or the destruction or snapping neck thing l. This is were the criticism needs to be not at people trying to bring their bias and love for a previous version of the character and dismissing the movie because it does not fit with their expectations.I agree that the critics gave it a pass. It's an entertaining, mediocre, and unoriginal film with a lot of flaws, but hey...people wanted to like it, but it won't last forever, because eventually...one day, people will realize that it's not that great and that they just wanted to relive a piece of their childhood with a less original version of a movie they love.
and then there are things that leave you scratching your head.
Like Lex Luthor randomly putting a piece of candy in someone's mouth?![]()
Did you like man of steel how do you think it compare to that. Yeah man I feel the same I have yet to see it but I am feeling bummed about the whole thing.I went in tonight at 6:00pm straight IMAX showing (no 3D) kinda bummed about the whole thing. My friends and I at work have been talking the same kinda stuff that we've all been discussing for the last few days since the critics began hammering this thing. I honestly had probably the lowest expectations I've ever had for a film like this. Totally on the ground. Hell, below the ground even.
About three hours later, I came out utterly stunned at how fantastic it was. Does it have flaws. Yes. But does it entertain, and even move your emotions? It definitely did for me. I cried several times. I didn't do that during Man of Steel. And does it bring some very interesting things to the table? IMHO, you bet your ass it does. It's basically a Wagnerian opera with the holy trinity of Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman all played out with the trappings of a Greek tragedy. I'm still contemplating and processing, but boy oh boy did I love this film. Snyder is ape**** crazy. And I thank I love him for it.
And I can leave you with this. The theatre roared with applause at the end. Not a few people or claps here or there. Pretty much the whole damn theatre which was sold out. I haven't experienced that since The Dark Knight.
I just got out and, honestly, this is probably the weirdest, most unconventional comic book movies I've ever seen and, probably, will see. The best way I can describe it is "Batman vs. Superman by way of Terrence Malick." There were some glaring issues with the plot, but, as far as all of the random excursions into post-apocalyptic wastelands, visions of dead relatives, and just a variety of other crazy **** go, I think it's really just in the eye of the beholder. I won't necessarily say I agree with the critics, but I will say that I can understand why it got the scores that it did.
Ultimately, the lesson I think this movie will impart more than anything is that, at the end of the day, the only objective truth is that truth is subjective. Some people will call this art, others will call it trash, and neither is more right than the other. Ultimately, the question I'm left with is "will it make money?" I think opening weekend's going to be crazy, but this is not a movie like Deadpool that will have longevity, where I can see people going back over and over and over again. Maybe once, just so they can get a better grasp of what was going on, but yeah, it's really something that you just have to see for yourself. There's some really beautifully done stuff that works amazingly, and then there are things that leave you scratching your head, and then there are other things that might leave you nodding in disapproval. If you're on the fence, just...just see it.
Half the experience for me was just staring in disbelief, with my jaw practically hanging to the floor. I can't really say that it's objectively good or bad, so, much as that it's definitely worth seeing.