It's a strategy!!
Really? When did they explain Hulkbuster? I don't remember.The origins of the Hulkbuster are explained before it appears. The 'armoured batsuit' is not mentioned at all. Was it made with the specific intentions of using it against Superman? Is it an older suit that has been used in the past? Is it mechanical, or just a suit with armour plates? Just a couple of lines would've cleared things up. As for a lot of the dreams, they contribute NOTHING to the story in hand..
Really? When did they explain Hulkbuster? I don't remember.
As for the Batarmor, you don't need to know if it was made for Supes, if it was or wasn't is irrelevant, it only matters that it was used for Supes, re purposed or not.
It obviously isn't just armor plates on top of each other, and Bruce is obviously not carrying it himself so it's obviously mechanical, which is why I keep saying that he had no time to put it back on and that he couldn't put it on by himself.
There's only one dream that you could say it doesn't contribute to the current story and that's the knigthmare/flash vision, but that one is important for world building, which makes it important. You don't need to know anything about the Batarmor.
Oh right.It is mentioned by Tony in conversation with Bruce, where it is referred to as 'Veronica'.
Why is that obviously the case? And if it is mechanical (and therefore stronger than the normal suit) why doesn't he just use it all the time?
And why is world building so important? Why not just let things develop naturally? We don't need to see snippets from future films every five minutes. Little eggs here and there are fine, but anything beyond that is simply a distraction.
Exactly, not only they're possibly vision of the future, Bruce sees this as straight up a nightmare, fueled by his hate and fear towards Superman.Normally I would agree but his visions were directly tied into the plot of the movie, they motivated him even more to push forward with his confrontation with Supermopey.
They were as much a catalyst for a call to arms as they were for setting up future threats and alliances.
Normally I would agree but his visions were directly tied into the plot of the movie, they motivated him even more to push forward with his confrontation with Supermopey.
They were as much a catalyst for a call to arms as they were to setting up future threats and alliances.
Too bad it was just those two rows. The film works best for the vacant.Five minutes from the start of my third viewing. Watching in 2D 70mm IMAX again. Theater is packed. Only the two front rows remain vacant.
Agreed. Like 12Bar says, we should be encouraging honest conversation without folks have to deal with that kind of response. C'mon. Khev's opinion is perfectly valid.Khev like any parent is free to raise his kid as he seems fit and lecturing him on how to do it is as pointless as it is ridiculous.
Please give that a rest.
I'm not someone who throws this around too much, but I think sexism probably played a role here. Sexism from studios thinking she wouldn't sell, and, perhaps, sexism from audiences who wouldn't have watched. We did get Catwoman a couple of times, but we really should have had Wonder Woman in some capacity.I'd only add her Super Friends invisible jet to that list. Did she really NEVER have a single live-action portrayal between Lynda Carter and Gadot? Just that one failed TV pilot a couple years ago and that's it? Damn. What a drought for such an "iconic" character.
I might be the only person on Earth who feels this way (and it would be VERY difficult to pull off) but I would love for there to be a big-budget, live action film with the same tone and sensibilities of Batman: The Brave & The Bold some day. Man, I loved that show.
But it doesn't matter that we know nothing about it, it's a huge mech-armor capable of punching a weakened Supes, and it was a bit hard to lift for a weakened Supes too, you can infer a couple things from that, it's just a cool gadget. You don't need to know anything that matters in the story related to that armor. Like the Hulkbuster, it's just a tool to punch a heavy hitter a couple times, that's all you need to know.
The Dream sequences are much more important.
My point you just quoted, he did not have time to put it back on even if he could put it on by himself, which I highly doubt, even wondering if he had enough time to put it back on is ridiculous.
Hulkbuster was explained right there in its name. Besides there is a history of why it was made. we DO have some context.
Imagine if iron Man had the Hulkbuster ready in Avengers 1... it wouldn't make as much sense. but after the Hulk attacks in Avengers 1, it makes a lot of freaking sense that IRon Man would have it right?
But imagine Iron Man having the Hulkbuster before Hulk attacks, that would be pretty stupid.
I'm intrigued by Brave and the Bold with the way you guys are praising it. This is a TV series that ran from 2008-2011 (according to a quick Google search) right? Looks more colorful than the Burton-esque B:TAS. I think I'll check it out after I get caught up on the classic Miller trades.
As I'm finishing up TDKR I'm intrigued with the idea of him having a female Robin sidekick. Do you think it's a sure thing that Jena Malone will be portraying Batgirl or might they be prepping her for Carrie Kelley?
I'm intrigued by Brave and the Bold with the way you guys are praising it. This is a TV series that ran from 2008-2011 (according to a quick Google search) right? Looks more colorful than the Burton-esque B:TAS. I think I'll check it out after I get caught up on the classic Miller trades.
It was already blindingly obvious that Bruce didn't like Supes. So why did we need the Knightmare seen to reinforce that?
Enter your email address to join: