Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (March 24th, 2016)

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
In that case I guess I'd lean over BvS too.

If I can, next week I'm seeing both again.

But if I can't I'll see just CW since I've seen BvS 5 times now. :lol
 


....

japanese-game-show-face-stocking.gif
 
The Japanese actually have a GAME SHOW were the object is to see which girl can remain conscious the longest while being suffocated by a stocking over their head!

I need to get my ass to Japan.
 
Honestly you can't compare BVS to CW. Civil war had 8 years of character development. BvS had one slugfest movie 3 years ago where the main part of the story was how much stuff can I destroy as character development, and a new Batman and Wonder Woman we know nothing about. I loved Affleck as Batman, and would love to learn more about him. Wonder Woman seems one dimensional for me because I still know practically nothing about her or where she comes from. We may think we know these characters based on the comics they are derived from, but we obviously don't.
 
Yeah, who wants a well made coherent movie?

I've got to say, "what the **** was so incoherent about it?" I see this same complaint over and over and over and over and over...and over again, and I genuinely can't understand it. Particularly after seeing it a second time. Literally, the only things that are even the slightest bit jarring are the visions, and there are, like, three of those in the movie, and each of them serves a thematic purpose.
 
I've got to say, "what the **** was so incoherent about it?" I see this same complaint over and over and over and over and over...and over again, and I genuinely can't understand it. Particularly after seeing it a second time. Literally, the only things that are even the slightest bit jarring are the visions, and there are, like, three of those in the movie, and each of them serves a thematic purpose.

If you've heard the complaint over and over and over and over again, I'm sure you've also seen why people said it. It's not my fault you dont understand why people felt that way. To each their own. And by the way CW > BvS. LOL
 
The one thing that got me as bad editing was deciding to put the scene where Diana finds the Luthor video while the fight between Batman and Superman is about to start. Can someone explain why Snyder decided to put that scene there?
 
If you've heard the complaint over and over and over and over again, I'm sure you've also seen why people said it. It's not my fault you dont understand why people felt that way. To each their own. And by the way CW > BvS. LOL

Maybe I'd like someone to explain it to me, because, in many of the reviews I've seen, I see the same complaint, with nothing really elaborated on. I just like the double standard, is all. If a fan of the movie was to say "you just didn't understand it," it would be met with the prerequisite eyeroll and the "just because I didn't like it doesn't mean I didn't understand it" line, but, if someone finds it incoherent, aren't they, by definition, not understanding it? I'm not looking for a fight or anything, but I'm genuinely curious, because I see the same complaint and it only goes as deep as that.
 
The one thing that got me as bad editing was deciding to put the scene where Diana finds the Luthor video while the fight between Batman and Superman is about to start. Can someone explain why Snyder decided to put that scene there?

There was many many moments like that. Why does the knoghtmare scene happen out of nowhere, only to have future flash come right after that?

Makes the whole thing confusing and nessy. Horrible horrible editing, I'm really hoping that the BluRay release fixes a lot of that
 
Back
Top