**Beware SPOILERS** Obi-Wan Kenobi Series on Disney+ **Beware SPOILERS**

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
But... the story hasn't changed

at no point in "A New Hope" (or any other Star Wars movie/TV series for that matter) does anybody say that Leia and Obi-Wan haven't met before, nor does anybody say that Luke has not seen a Lightsaber before, nor does anybody say that Obi-Wan Kenobi and Darth Vader have not seen eachother in 19 years.

That might be what story you have come up with in your head to fill in the blanks, but that's on you (and anybody else that has adopted this narrative).
Oh boy.... Your a young one aren't you... :lol

You definitely did not grow up with the OT. Maybe the PT, or worse, the new ST?

Your doing exactly what I said. Your the one revisiting to rationalize a new "interpretation". No one ever questioned any of it before.
 
In theory, all they need to do, is come up with an OK story. Doesn't need to be great, just as long as it isn't BoBF or ST terrible.
Get a decent director who will make this look good, basically not Robert Rodriguez (they've got Deborah Chow so they should be fine) .
Throw in some member berries here and there. Make sure Ewan and Hayden get some cool scenes together....
Try not to crap on Kenobi too much (just don't do to him what they did to Luke and Boba)
Give Vader a "badass" scene.
Basically doesn't need to be amazing, or even good perhaps, just not garbage and as long as it looks cool and fan favourite characters get to shine, they've pulled it off.
Boom done. Fans will praise it. Star Wars back on track after BoBF.
 
RE: Loki2371

Nobody is questioning anything now?

Not that it should matter, but whilst I was born after the OT (1989), I did "grow up" with the OT on video in the 90s and that was Star Wars to me (before the PT was released).

You can use ageism and growing up in the 70s/80s to claim sole ownership of the "correct" Star Wars story and to try to reinforce your stance all you like, but what I said remains true... none of the leaks so far contradict or retcon anything in the established Star Wars story. They just don't.

I can understand your trepidation approaching this series after being burned by some of Disney's Star Wars content so far (I don't like the ST at all and don't consider it canon, I think it demonstrates a fundamental lack of respect for - and understanding of - Star Wars and it's characters), but this is all a bit much based on;

A) something that has not been seen yet

and

B) your critique that, with respect, isn't legitimate, constructive, or based in reality or fact
 
Last edited:
Another example when the Russo's stated Cap was always worthy and could've lifted Mjolnir in AOU.. But he chose not to. That's utter and complete BS. They had nothing to do with that movie. Change the past to fit your story for today.

Just want to disagree on this one point - I don't think that one was BS at all. Why wouldn't Cap have been worthy in AOU? Why would he have been less worthy than Thor at that particular time? He moved it. No one else was able to move it. So, what, we were supposed to conclude from that that Cap was ''a tiny bit worthy'' - I find that to be the more stupid idea.
 
Just want to disagree on this one point - I don't think that one was BS at all. Why wouldn't Cap have been worthy in AOU? Why would he have been less worthy than Thor at that particular time? He moved it. No one else was able to move it. So, what, we were supposed to conclude from that that Cap was ''a tiny bit worthy'' - I find that to be the more stupid idea.
No. It was a cool foreshadowing scene. That when the time came, THEN he would be worthy....

It cheapens the moment in EG to believe he was always worthy and at any point he could've wielded Mjolnir.

It also kinda takes away from the moment Vision picks it up and hands it to Thor, and cheapens the laugh your supposed to get when they are discussing why Vision could lift it.
 
Last edited:
No. It was a cool foreshadowing scene. That when the time came, THEN he would be worthy....

It cheapens the moment in EG to believe he was always worthy and at any point he could've wielded Mjolnir.

It also kinda takes away from the moment Vision picks it up and hands it to Thor, and cheapens the laugh your supposed to get when they are discussing why Vision could lift it.
Perhaps that was the intention in AOU, maybe. I don't recall if Whedon ever confirmed one way or another. However I have zero issue with the Russos interpretation.

I don't think it cheapens the Endgame moment at all. Furthermore, if you believe he could have lifted it in the AOU party scene yet chose not to it further demonstrates the quality of his character.

I grant you this is speculative on my part but I'm basing it on an overall assessment of Steve Rogers as we had known him up to this point -

I don't think Cap walks up to the hammer believing that he can lift it. He probably assumes some kind of Macguffin would prevent any human from doing so. If he had suspected he would be able to lift it, I don't think he would have partook of the challenge in the first place, knowing that his lifting the hammer would embarrass Thor - and all for what - a silly game. The Russo interpretation allows that Cap himself was surprised that he moved it and decided to stop right there.

As far as the comedy derived from Vision being able to lift it - if anything that scene cheapens Cap's Endgame moment by having it that some character other than Thor had already wielded the hammer.
 
Last edited:
MCU Captain America debate in an Obi-Wan thread is it?

I’m calling Khev right now he will settle this…

1652983973149.gif
 
Last edited:
You can use ageism and growing up in the 70s/80s to claim sole ownership of the "correct" Star Wars story and to try to reinforce your stance all you like, but what I said remains true... none of the leaks so far contradict or retcon anything in the established Star Wars story. They just don't.

Well it's unfortunate you feel that way but it doesn't change anything. You weren't a Star Wars fan during the "dark ages" from the late 80s to the mid 90s. I know it's hard for people that weren't around then to believe, but SW wasn't "cool" or hip or even talked about at all. It was essentially forgotten for almost a decade, and only the nerdiest of nerds kept it going by buying the only merch that was available: role playing games, novels, and comic books. Finally in 1995, Lucasfilm re-released the movies on VHS and everyone kinda said "Oh yeah, Star Wars...I remember." But some of us were around for those dark days, keeping the fire burning, and we were on message boards and newsgroups on the internet in its infancy, arguing about BS back then just like we are now.

As far as retcons go, it's a fact that Lucas retconned everything as he went. Darth Vader was not supposed to be Luke's father, and Leia sure as hell wasn't suppose to be his sister, and in no way was Star Wars ever supposed to be "the grand saga of the rise and fall of Anakin Skywalker." All that stuff came later.

With the original three movies, the only real mess happens in the last movie, when Lucas has to explain why Obi Wan lied (of course in the original movie he wasn't lying) and why in the world he would let Luke and Leia make out if they were brother and sister. That's a mess that can never be solved, unfortunately.

Things only got worse with the prequels, and he just kept piling on more crap. Obi Wan's age for example.

There are some things that are just indisputable, however.

One...Luke Skywalker had never seen or touched a lightsaber until Obi Wan gave him Anakin's saber in his hut.

Two....Leia had never met Obi Wan in person. She was sending the message to him out of sheer desperation.

Three: Obi Wan and Vader's history is ambiguous in Star Wars, but in ROTJ it's clear that they had not seen each other since their final fateful duel. Obi Wan doesn't need to SEE Vader in person to know who he is; he's famous around the galaxy as the Emperor's enforcer. He also knows for a fact he's more machine than man cause he left Anakin limbless. Put it together with "We meet again, at last. The circle is now complete. When I left you I was but the learner. Now, I am the master." and he could only be talking about the duel on Mustafar.

Retcons happen. They've been happening since the sequel to Star Wars got greenlit. But I think everyone was a bit more accepting of them, however stupid, as long as they were coming from Lucas himself. The fact that this is all just a bunch of fan-fic nonsense a corporation has thrown together to churn out more product makes it less than nothing in my eyes, the same as the "sequel trilogy.
 
Well it's unfortunate you feel that way but it doesn't change anything. You weren't a Star Wars fan during the "dark ages" from the late 80s to the mid 90s. I know it's hard for people that weren't around then to believe, but SW wasn't "cool" or hip or even talked about at all. It was essentially forgotten for almost a decade, and only the nerdiest of nerds kept it going by buying the only merch that was available: role playing games, novels, and comic books. Finally in 1995, Lucasfilm re-released the movies on VHS and everyone kinda said "Oh yeah, Star Wars...I remember." But some of us were around for those dark days, keeping the fire burning, and we were on message boards and newsgroups on the internet in its infancy, arguing about BS back then just like we are now.

I didn't exist yet for Star Wars and ESB and was too young to see ROTJ in the cinema so I didn't experience the original hype for Star Wars but I remember fondly the time when Star Wars was starting to 'come back' - the Digitally Remastered VHS rereleases, the Zahn books, the Galoob Micro Machines, the early POTF2 and then of course the Special Editions. Good times.
 
Well it's unfortunate you feel that way but it doesn't change anything. You weren't a Star Wars fan during the "dark ages" from the late 80s to the mid 90s. I know it's hard for people that weren't around then to believe, but SW wasn't "cool" or hip or even talked about at all. It was essentially forgotten for almost a decade, and only the nerdiest of nerds kept it going by buying the only merch that was available: role playing games, novels, and comic books. Finally in 1995, Lucasfilm re-released the movies on VHS and everyone kinda said "Oh yeah, Star Wars...I remember." But some of us were around for those dark days, keeping the fire burning, and we were on message boards and newsgroups on the internet in its infancy, arguing about BS back then just like we are now.

As far as retcons go, it's a fact that Lucas retconned everything as he went. Darth Vader was not supposed to be Luke's father, and Leia sure as hell wasn't suppose to be his sister, and in no way was Star Wars ever supposed to be "the grand saga of the rise and fall of Anakin Skywalker." All that stuff came later.

With the original three movies, the only real mess happens in the last movie, when Lucas has to explain why Obi Wan lied (of course in the original movie he wasn't lying) and why in the world he would let Luke and Leia make out if they were brother and sister. That's a mess that can never be solved, unfortunately.

Things only got worse with the prequels, and he just kept piling on more crap. Obi Wan's age for example.

There are some things that are just indisputable, however.

One...Luke Skywalker had never seen or touched a lightsaber until Obi Wan gave him Anakin's saber in his hut.

Two....Leia had never met Obi Wan in person. She was sending the message to him out of sheer desperation.

Three: Obi Wan and Vader's history is ambiguous in Star Wars, but in ROTJ it's clear that they had not seen each other since their final fateful duel. Obi Wan doesn't need to SEE Vader in person to know who he is; he's famous around the galaxy as the Emperor's enforcer. He also knows for a fact he's more machine than man cause he left Anakin limbless. Put it together with "We meet again, at last. The circle is now complete. When I left you I was but the learner. Now, I am the master." and he could only be talking about the duel on Mustafar.

Retcons happen. They've been happening since the sequel to Star Wars got greenlit. But I think everyone was a bit more accepting of them, however stupid, as long as they were coming from Lucas himself. The fact that this is all just a bunch of fan-fic nonsense a corporation has thrown together to churn out more product makes it less than nothing in my eyes, the same as the "sequel trilogy.

With respect, I think people are missing my point.

Those are all possible retcons from within the original Star Wars Trilogy.

My point is, and always has been, that there is nothing in the "Obi-Wan Kenobi" leaks that contradicts or retcons anything in the established Star Wars story.

There are some things that are just indisputable, however.

One...Luke Skywalker had never seen or touched a lightsaber until Obi Wan gave him Anakin's saber in his hut.


This is never said or established. Not trying to be difficult, but it just isn't. If there is dialogue or something that states that Luke has never seen or touched a Lightsaber before, then please provide it, because I don't think it exists.

Two....Leia had never met Obi Wan in person. She was sending the message to him out of sheer desperation.

Again, this is never said or established. If there is dialogue or something that states that Leia has never met Obi-Wan before, then please provide it. I don't quite understand the argument relating to the message being sent to him out of desperation either. Yes, she is desperate, but messages of desperation are not exclusively for people we don't know. You can send a message of desperation to someone that you know.

Three: Obi Wan and Vader's history is ambiguous in Star Wars, but in ROTJ it's clear that they had not seen each other since their final fateful duel. Obi Wan doesn't need to SEE Vader in person to know who he is; he's famous around the galaxy as the Emperor's enforcer. He also knows for a fact he's more machine than man cause he left Anakin limbless. Put it together with "We meet again, at last. The circle is now complete. When I left you I was but the learner. Now, I am the master." and he could only be talking about the duel on Mustafar.

Again, this is never said or established. If there is dialogue or something that states that the last time that Obi-Wan Kenobi and Darth Vader met before their duel on the Death Star was on Mustafar, then please provide it. If anything, ROTJ actually supports the notion that there were other meetings between Mustafar and the Death Star. When Luke asks Vader "Come with me", Vader says "Obi-Wan once thought as you do" in response - this must have come from a confrontation other than Mustafar or the Death Star, because Obi-Wan makes no appeal to Vader to come with him during either of those moments.

Yes, there was a period of time in the late 80s and early 90s when Star Wars was seemingly forgotten, but I am not disputing that and not actually sure how and why that became part of the conversation, as it isn't relevant to the debate at hand regarding whether the plot leaks for "Obi-Wan Kenobi" retcon anything in the Star Wars story.

And, nobody has really responded to this with a concrete answer and tangible evidence to show that these leaks do retcon plot points from the established story (other than one's own assumptions and unfounded conclusions as to what happened in the 19 years between "Revenge of the Sith" and "A New Hope"). The only argument I see is the fact that I "wasn't there at the beginning and when Star Wars wasn't cool". Yes... and that is relevant how exactly?

Put it this way, if the "Obi-Wan Kenobi" plot leaks are true, and the entire Star Wars saga was released in chronological order (ie. "Obi-Wan Kenobi" was released before "A New Hope"), then nothing that happens or is said in "A New Hope" would contradict anything that came before it in "Obi-Wan Kenobi", and nobody would bat an eyelid.

I get that people are down on Disney Star Wars. I feel a little down on it myself. I despise the Sequel Trilogy and, whilst I have not yet seen "The Book of Boba Fett", what I have heard does not fill me with much excitement or hope at all. But that doesn't mean that all Disney Star Wars content has to be crap; "Rebels" is a good show that really adds to the overall Star Wars story, "Rogue One" is great, "The Mandalorian" etc. etc. And it certainly doesn't mean that, just because it is being made by Disney, "Obi-Wan Kenobi" is going to retcon anything established in existing Star Wars content. The only thing it appears to be retconning at the moment are the ideas, assumptions and possibilities in people's heads.
 
With respect, I think people are missing my point.

Those are all possible retcons from within the original Star Wars Trilogy.

My point is, and always has been, that there is nothing in the "Obi-Wan Kenobi" leaks that contradicts or retcons anything in the established Star Wars story.

There are some things that are just indisputable, however.

One...Luke Skywalker had never seen or touched a lightsaber until Obi Wan gave him Anakin's saber in his hut.


This is never said or established. Not trying to be difficult, but it just isn't. If there is dialogue or something that states that Luke has never seen or touched a Lightsaber before, then please provide it, because I don't think it exists.

Two....Leia had never met Obi Wan in person. She was sending the message to him out of sheer desperation.

Again, this is never said or established. If there is dialogue or something that states that Leia has never met Obi-Wan before, then please provide it. I don't quite understand the argument relating to the message being sent to him out of desperation either. Yes, she is desperate, but messages of desperation are not exclusively for people we don't know. You can send a message of desperation to someone that you know.

Three: Obi Wan and Vader's history is ambiguous in Star Wars, but in ROTJ it's clear that they had not seen each other since their final fateful duel. Obi Wan doesn't need to SEE Vader in person to know who he is; he's famous around the galaxy as the Emperor's enforcer. He also knows for a fact he's more machine than man cause he left Anakin limbless. Put it together with "We meet again, at last. The circle is now complete. When I left you I was but the learner. Now, I am the master." and he could only be talking about the duel on Mustafar.

Again, this is never said or established. If there is dialogue or something that states that the last time that Obi-Wan Kenobi and Darth Vader met before their duel on the Death Star was on Mustafar, then please provide it. If anything, ROTJ actually supports the notion that there were other meetings between Mustafar and the Death Star. When Luke asks Vader "Come with me", Vader says "Obi-Wan once thought as you do" in response - this must have come from a confrontation other than Mustafar or the Death Star, because Obi-Wan makes no appeal to Vader to come with him during either of those moments.

Yes, there was a period of time in the late 80s and early 90s when Star Wars was seemingly forgotten, but I am not disputing that and not actually sure how and why that became part of the conversation, as it isn't relevant to the debate at hand regarding whether the plot leaks for "Obi-Wan Kenobi" retcon anything in the Star Wars story.

And, nobody has really responded to this with a concrete answer and tangible evidence to show that these leaks do retcon plot points from the established story (other than one's own assumptions and unfounded conclusions as to what happened in the 19 years between "Revenge of the Sith" and "A New Hope"). The only argument I see is the fact that I "wasn't there at the beginning and when Star Wars wasn't cool". Yes... and that is relevant how exactly?

Put it this way, if the "Obi-Wan Kenobi" plot leaks are true, and the entire Star Wars saga was released in chronological order (ie. "Obi-Wan Kenobi" was released before "A New Hope"), then nothing that happens or is said in "A New Hope" would contradict anything that came before it in "Obi-Wan Kenobi", and nobody would bat an eyelid.

I get that people are down on Disney Star Wars. I feel a little down on it myself. I despise the Sequel Trilogy and, whilst I have not yet seen "The Book of Boba Fett", what I have heard does not fill me with much excitement or hope at all. But that doesn't mean that all Disney Star Wars content has to be crap; "Rebels" is a good show that really adds to the overall Star Wars story, "Rogue One" is great, "The Mandalorian" etc. etc. And it certainly doesn't mean that, just because it is being made by Disney, "Obi-Wan Kenobi" is going to retcon anything established in existing Star Wars content. The only thing it appears to be retconning at the moment are the ideas, assumptions and possibilities in people's heads.
It really has nothing to do with what was said thru dialogue in the movies but everything to do with the obvious intent of the scene.

When curious farmer boy Luke first saw the saber in ANH it was 100% meant to be his first time seeing it regardless of dialogue that was not said I mean it is clearly CLEARLY meant to be his first time the raw emotion of the scene SCREAMS that.

Sure one can imagine that he could’ve visibly saw one as a young boy either ignited or not and just not remembered it BUT I still remember my first naked **** so ymmv lol
 
Last edited:
It really has nothing to do with what was said thru dialogue in the movies but everything to do with the obvious intent of the scene.

When curious farmer boy Luke first saw the saber in ANH it was 100% meant to be his first time seeing it regardless of dialogue that was not said I mean it is clearly CLEARLY meant to be his first time the raw emotion of the scene SCREAMS that.

Sure one can imagine that he could’ve visibly saw one as a young boy either ignited or not and just not remembered it BUT I still remember my first naked **** so ymmv lol
Cinematic or in person? Cinematic was of course, Fast Times for me. In-person, actually much less memorable...
 
Back
Top