George Lucas went to great lengths to show that Jedi were never meant to be executioners, no matter the stakes. Anakin knew he was wrong to kill Dooku the way he did and it was Mace Windu who screwed up everything, dooming millions to die, because he made the "logical" but morally wrong choice to execute a seemingly defenseless Palpatine.Yeah, so heartbreaking that Obi walked away AGAIN, allowing MILLIONS more people to die, instead of finishing the job then and there.
Stupid, vapid, illogical.
Weeelll...forgetting certain inconsistencies that require fan gymnastics or hand waving (such as the Jedi leading a war machine consisting of clones bred for it etc. etc.) ... Jedi ethics run into immediate trouble in the case of Vader. Leaving him alive or at least free to go = leaving a vicious predator on the loose in service to the evil Empire.So Obi-Wan sparing a wheezing Vader who was slumped and on his knees tracks with proper Jedi teachings.
Yes, taking him prisoner would have been fully within the rights of a Jedi. I was only contending with the assertion that he should have killed him on the spot. That said I'm not really sure where Obi-Wan would have even been able to take an imprisoned Vader at that point.Weeelll...forgetting certain inconsistencies that require fan gymnastics or hand waving (such as the Jedi leading a war machine consisting of clones bred for it etc. etc.) ... Jedi ethics run into immediate trouble in the case of Vader. Leaving him alive or at least free to go = leaving a vicious predator on the loose in service to the evil Empire.
Even if he wasn't going to kill him the onus was on Obi Wan to at least take him prisoner. But instead he walks away again. The argument that Tarkin would have blasted Alderaan with or without Vader is irrelevant; he is nonetheless an important tool of the Emperor and is 100% going to do a whole lotta Bad Guy stuff.
Well that's Obi Wan's problem. Lazy Jedi.Yes, taking him prisoner would have been fully within the rights of a Jedi. I was only contending with the assertion that he should have killed him on the spot. That said I'm not really sure where Obi-Wan would have even been able to take an imprisoned Vader at that point.
My one critique is that if you had Obi-Wan sensing Luke’s peril a scene earlier, it would 100% justify him rushing off to ensure his safety and leaving Vader again.Yes, taking him prisoner would have been fully within the rights of a Jedi. I was only contending with the assertion that he should have killed him on the spot. That said I'm not really sure where Obi-Wan would have even been able to take an imprisoned Vader at that point.
Khev telling a-dev about Rey being the "other:"However...(and a-dev is not gonna like this, lol) the ST finally gives an out for that OT continuity gaffe if you allow for the "other" that Yoda referred to in ESB to be...Rey.
I was just going to say that myself. They could have perfectly mimicked Palpatine's "I sense Lord Vader is in danger" that he uttered after dueling with Yoda and had Obi-Wan have to depart immediately to try and help Luke. Oh well, yet another missed opportunity on account of the writers.My one critique is that if you had Obi-Wan sensing Luke’s peril a scene earlier, it would 100% justify him rushing off to ensure his safety and leaving Vader again.
Obi-Wan's mercy is not only appropriate for a true Jedi, but leaving Anakin/Vader alive supports the interpretation that Luke was viewed as the "last hope" for something other than killing Vader. Killing Vader does *nothing* to usurp the Emperor. Y'know... the most powerful bad guy in terms of both the Force and political influence. If you think about it, having someone as powerful as Vader turning on Palpatine is really the only way to actually win.George Lucas went to great lengths to show that Jedi were never meant to be executioners, no matter the stakes. Anakin knew he was wrong to kill Dooku the way he did and it was Mace Windu who screwed up everything, dooming millions to die, because he made the "logical" but morally wrong choice to execute a seemingly defenseless Palpatine.
So Obi-Wan sparing a wheezing Vader who was slumped and on his knees tracks with proper Jedi teachings.
Obi-Wan's mercy is not only appropriate for a true Jedi, but leaving Anakin/Vader alive supports the interpretation that Luke was viewed as the "last hope" for something other than killing Vader. Killing Vader does *nothing* to usurp the Emperor. Y'know... the most powerful bad guy in terms of both the Force and political influence. If you think about it, having someone as powerful as Vader turning on Palpatine is really the only way to actually win.
People will keep pointing to the exchange when Luke tells Kenobi that he can't kill his own father and the response is, "Then the Emperor has already won." But that sort of thing is for structural storytelling purposes. If you let the audience know ahead of time that Luke isn't actually meant to have a to-the-death duel, you'd lower the tension/suspense for the movie's climax.
At no time did either Yoda or Kenobi tell Luke that he had to *kill* Vader. It was essentially variations of "you must *face* Vader." Having a long game of 20 years for Luke Skywalker just to be trained to be a more effective killer doesn't jibe with his actual training, and would make no sense. The Dagobah cave failure would make no sense. Yoda's lessons about "never attack" would make no sense.
A Jedi should kill when there's no other choice. Luke was trained to be able to defend himself, and yes, kill if he has to. But the idea that killing Darth Vader was the ultimate goal and that 20 years of Imperial terror would go by before Luke starts being turned into a better killing machine than Obi-Wan was 20 years prior (when he *defeated* Vader) is, well... kinda dumb.
I'm not really sure where Obi-Wan would have even been able to take an imprisoned Vader at that point.
All you have to do is separate "That boy is our last hope/no, there is another" from "There is another...Skywalker..." as referring to two different people which actually works quite well with what is shown on screen.Khev telling a-dev about Rey being the "other:"
His jawa buddy will be mine!His jawa buddy would have traded him the whole Eaglemoss Skyhopper series for that suit.
Don’t forget Leia didn’t recognize Luke in ANH , even when he said his name…they can’t interact before that because even Disney knows that would ruin SW continuity in the OT. Although it was a crazy idea how to split them up in the episode it had to be done to preserve the story in ANH.I agree that the "superman" fights are not very interesting. Pulling stone towers over on one another really adds nothing since it seems to have little effect.
Another nit was the sudden abandonment of the Leia story -- 5 episodes -- to pull Luke into the finale. Obi just leaves Leia on a ship in the care of a swindler? Felt a little awkward, although I get that he believed he was sacrificing himself to save her.
Enter your email address to join: