jinxx
Super Freak
Well said! Don't get mad at me, I wikipedied that!
Whatever, encyclopedia dramatica queen!:emperor
Well said! Don't get mad at me, I wikipedied that!
That's nice, but total medal count: U.S.A. = 28 Canaduh =15.
I wonder why more people don't live there .....
I wonder why more people don't live there .....
So if Korea has a total medal count of 40 with 1 gold and 39 Bronze and the US has 39 medals with 38 gold and 1 bronze, Korea is the champ right?
Its gold medals or GTFU, I dont care many first,second,third or fourth place losers any country has.
I think Canada is poised to rack up at least 4 more golds, and the bet of mine is slipping away quickly
Even simple logic like that will go over their heads. So don't bother bud. You can try, but you can't teach the unteachable. :chew
STFU douche.
I just love the way deeznutz and Eli love to skew numbers to support their outlook. We went through this with the Pens and Habs. Countries are list by TOTAL MEDAL COUNT and that's how everyone who's sane has them listed. Not by "my countries doing well with Gold...so lets go with that arguement".
The US is spankin' Canada in the medal count...just deal with it. I like you guys but, the red and white 3D glasses have to come off.
Dude, I am far from being a Canada cheerleader, I actually could careless about anythign but hockey. I was merely proving a point, one that I agree with regardless of how many gold Canada wins, I didnt think they would win more then 5.
Dude, I am far from being a Canada cheerleader, I actually could careless about anythign but hockey. I was merely proving a point, one that I agree with regardless of how many gold Canada wins, I didnt think they would win more then 5. If your ok with total medals, then youll agree with my original post right? I think the winning country should be determined by total golds, regardless of who it is, KOREA/GERMANY/CANADA/NORWAY/USA/CAMBODIA etc. That country has the most top athletes at that event period, you are the winner.
Dude, I am far from being a Canada cheerleader, I actually could careless about anythign but hockey. I was merely proving a point, one that I agree with regardless of how many gold Canada wins, I didnt think they would win more then 5. If your ok with total medals, then youll agree with my original post right? I think the winning country should be determined by total golds, regardless of who it is, KOREA/GERMANY/CANADA/NORWAY/USA/CAMBODIA etc. That country has the most top athletes at that event period, you are the winner.
And the population totals is crap, where is India and China in these games???
Also, I so won that Pens vs Habs debate
Since expansion to 21 teams, the pens have more cups and finals appearances
Actually yeah total medal count is important to me because I don't see the point in bragging about 7 golds when your country only rakes in 15 total in all the events so far.
And I find this funny:
https://sports.espn.go.com/olympics/winter/2010/news/story?id=4937260
Boring day in the Olympics, huh? Anyone going to watch curling?
Boring day in the Olympics, huh? Anyone going to watch curling?
There's that unique way you have of seeing things....again. It's history...not starting when it works for you.
Yes, I agree with your first post. Total medals wins. Every Olympic website and publication lists them in order of total medals not gold.
i have no problem with people seeing them as total medal wins, as long as if the shoe was on the other foot you accept it that way also. if another country passes the usa in total medals but you have more golds, would you still see it that way?? for most people i doubt it, they would be arguing usa most golds, its a two way street. Usa just has the luxury of being first in most medals, and possibly most golds.
Are you a habs fan?