Why not? Who's making these "rules" and determines the criteria? I'll do what I want.![]()
Raiders: 10
TOD: 8
TLC: 7
TFA: 8
TWS: 9
CW: 9
Cap wins.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5a2d/b5a2d3873f9730948c6b00d38beb289995c2066c" alt="Lecture :lecture :lecture"
Why not? Who's making these "rules" and determines the criteria? I'll do what I want.![]()
Regardless, most of those "trilogies" aren't trilogies anymore.
Raiders: 10
TOD: 8
TLC: 7
TFA: 8
TWS: 9
CW: 9
Cap wins.
![]()
Meh. Nah...
Raiders: 10
TOD: 8
TLC: 7
TFA: 7
TWS: 8
CW: 8
Sure they are. They're just "trilogies plus some other ****."
Are you still in London and letting Zack post as you?![]()
If that's the case, anything can count as a trilogy as long as you like it.
Those are very fair, rational scores, actually.
Sweet. This is my new favorite trilogy then:
![]()
True, and if Zack probably WAS posting it'd look more like:
TFA: -100
TWS: -1000
CW: -100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Considering he was Mr. "If we're not careful one day we'll end up with a Captain America movie."![]()
![]()
Don't you mean ESB/RAIDERS/FOTR
I love these discussions. Our Millennial friends are probably baffled.
![]()
I take Raiders over any Capt movie for now
Yeah it was funny watching them all go quiet a little while ago when we were all having that discussion with JAWS about 70's/obscure 80's movies.
![]()
Old Dudes Unite!![]()