Casey Anthony Trial

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
What's crazy is that I've not talked to one person, heard one news anchor, tv host, random person on the street, or family member who thought she was not guilty, and somehow Florida found 12 who unanimously found her not guilty within only one day of deliberating?
 
l have been watching this since day one years ago. this makes me sick what happened today. l knew she wouldn't get the death penalty, or first degree. l thought she would get aggravated child abuse, and man sloughter. l thought for sure sh was going away for atleast 15-20 years, but no she got off. not guilty in anything to do with the girls death. she will be released this week. even if she didnt kill her daughter, which she did, how the hell did the kid end up dumped in the woods. then she goes out banging guys getting tattoos and partying. just that alone should of gotten her charged for the child abuse charges, but no she gets off.

her defence said she was molested by her father, there wasn't a single shred of evidence of that. then they said the girl accidently drowned, again no evidence of that, but her daughter was dead for a month while she was partying. then they find the girl dead decomposed with tape on her mouth. that proves this was no accident, fowel play happened. but she still got off. these jurors must be fully retarted or they were drinking during the trial.

l hope she ends up missing in the next six months and she is found murdered in the woods. Americas justice system at work. now she will get rich from this. a bet she will right a book and do something to profit, the sad thing is stupid people will buy it if that happens.
 
Last edited:
I wish the judge had the balls to give her jail time instead of time served. Those female inmates don't take kindly to child killers.
 
then they find the girl dead decomposed with tape on her mouth. that proves this was no accident, fowel play happened. but she still got off. these jurors must be fully retarted or they were drinking during the trial.

But NONE of this directly links Casey to the death of her daughter...thus, not guilty.

The jurors did what they were supposed to do: take emotion out of it and weigh the evidence the prosecution presented. And none of the evidence proved beyond a reasonable doubt that she murdered her daughter.

The system worked just as it should work. The prosecution is who failed and who everyone should be pissed at.
 
The system worked on the count of First Degree Murder. They didn't prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he did it and it was all circumstancial evidence (although that got Scott Peterson nabbed in CA...) but on the second and third counts of Aggravated Manslaughter and Child Abuse, they far exceeded the need to prove that. Every analyst even those defending the not guilty on murder and praising it have scratched their heads on that one.
 
What's crazy is that I've not talked to one person, heard one news anchor, tv host, random person on the street, or family member who thought she was not guilty, and somehow Florida found 12 who unanimously found her not guilty within only one day of deliberating?

I mean this as no offense, but has it ever occurred to any of you that maybe the reason we all believed her to be guilty was because we (people removed from the trial, who only hear about it from sensationalized media) don't know the facts as well as the jury, who has all of the evidence laid out in front of them? No preconceived notions or opinions from news anchors. Just the evidence and cold hard facts. There obviously was not enough to convict her based on what was presented by the prosecution. The jury did indeed do their job, and I can only commend them. I'm sure it was tough.
 
But NONE of this directly links Casey to the death of her daughter...thus, not guilty.

The jurors did what they were supposed to do: take emotion out of it and weigh the evidence the prosecution presented. And none of the evidence proved beyond a reasonable doubt that she murdered her daughter.

The system worked just as it should work. The prosecution is who failed and who everyone should be pissed at.

:lecture Exactly. Doesn't matter what you think, only what you can prove.

2hsb6eg.jpg
 
But NONE of this directly links Casey to the death of her daughter...thus, not guilty.

The jurors did what they were supposed to do: take emotion out of it and weigh the evidence the prosecution presented. And none of the evidence proved beyond a reasonable doubt that she murdered her daughter.

The system worked just as it should work. The prosecution is who failed and who everyone should be pissed at.

I agree with this. Prosecution dropped the ball. I certainly believe she knows what happened and I think her parents are far from innocent. But no one really knows. Hence the verdict.
 
^^^

I need to see that show :lecture. Someone needs to be held responsible for this childs death; if it wasn't murder based on evidence, Child neglect should be there at bare minimum. This child will never get the justice she deserves and that is the worst part of this whole thing.
 
I can't believe this girl is gonna go home, change her hair color, change her name... and have a nice life.

I think the jury pulled a fast one so they could sell books down the line. ******* wouldn't even explain their conclusions. But watch for the books and Lifetime movies by next year.

Makes me sick.

Someone should set her up with OJ. The Battle of the Titans as they try to kill each other.
 
^^^

I need to see that show :lecture. Someone needs to be held responsible for this childs death; if it wasn't murder based on evidence, Child neglect should be there at bare minimum. This child will never get the justice she deserves and that is the worst part of this whole thing.

I'm wondering if they will try to go after her dad now? They can't do anything to her now. She can admit to something now and still not be prosecuted. It's crazy, but again I understand the verdict and it sickens me to say I feelnthe jury made the right call if you believe in the law as it stands. The prosecution dropped the ball big time! I also feel the dad used his police background to help cover things up.
 
The system worked on the count of First Degree Murder. They didn't prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he did it and it was all circumstancial evidence (although that got Scott Peterson nabbed in CA...) but on the second and third counts of Aggravated Manslaughter and Child Abuse, they far exceeded the need to prove that. Every analyst even those defending the not guilty on murder and praising it have scratched their heads on that one.

exactly. l knew she wouldn't be charged for death or 1st degree. we all know she did it. there just isn't reallly any evidence she did it. it blows me away she didn't get charged with aggravated manslaughter and child abuse. she abused her child by dumping her in the woods. that right there should of had her convicted. even if the kid did drown in the pool, how did she end up in the woods. that there is child abuse, even if she is already dead.

has it ever occurred to any of you that maybe the reason we all believed her to be guilty was because we (people removed from the trial, who only hear about it from sensationalized media) don't know the facts as well as the jury, who has all of the evidence laid out in front of them? No preconceived notions or opinions from news anchors. Just the evidence and cold hard facts. There obviously was not enough to convict her based on what was presented by the prosecution. The jury did indeed do their job, and I can only commend them. I'm sure it was tough.

it's the other way around. we heard alot more evidence against her that was not allowed in court or removed. the jurors heard much less evidence in this case then we have heard in the media. it's also the cops fault in the begining. they miss handled evidence and contradicted each other and screwed up alot of evidence.

l still don't see how she wasn't convicted. there was a rotting bodie in her car. she was lying for a whole month about where here daughter was. (she was dead in the woods). she was partying and stuff. lying about a fake nanny taking her kid. and the bodie found decomposed on the woods with tape on her mouth. why would the tape be there. she killed her killed because she wanted to act her age and party and not be a mother and all the time it takes to be that. she wanted to be free and unattached, so she killed her kid, end of story. karma will nock on her door one day. l bet down the road she will do something stupid again and hopefully get hit with the book then.
 
I agree with this. Prosecution dropped the ball. I certainly believe she knows what happened and I think her parents are far from innocent. But no one really knows. Hence the verdict.

like l said to my friends who were watching this. the whole Anthony family shoould of been brought into the back of the court house and shot. all them are screwed up badly. that's how l feel. nine of them are innocent in this. Casey killed that kid, end of story. the dad tried to cover up the smell in the car by cleaning it. the mom went on the stand and lied and said she was the one who searched for chloroform to protect her daughter, prosecution then proved she was at work when the search was made on the home computer, so she was lying. the dad also lied on the stand. Casey knew she was going to prison for a long time and tried to drag her dad there with her, saying he molested her, blaming everything on him, saying he found Caylee dead and covered it up and he still tried and protect her. even she was stunned she was not guilty.

l seriously hope someone kills this chick in the near future. because there is no doubt when she gets out she had better watch her back.
 
I'm wondering if they will try to go after her dad now? They can't do anything to her now. She can admit to something now and still not be prosecuted. It's crazy, but again I understand the verdict and it sickens me to say I feelnthe jury made the right call if you believe in the law as it stands. The prosecution dropped the ball big time! I also feel the dad used his police background to help cover things up.

She just can't be tried for the murder charge. Anything else they can if they find more evidence or something.
 
I'm wondering if they will try to go after her dad now? They can't do anything to her now. She can admit to something now and still not be prosecuted. It's crazy, but again I understand the verdict and it sickens me to say I feelnthe jury made the right call if you believe in the law as it stands. The prosecution dropped the ball big time! I also feel the dad used his police background to help cover things up.

They won't go after the dad or anyone else. The prosecution got embarassed and in the minds of many, wasted millions of tax payer dollars on this case because she was found not guilty.

Also, add the fact they could not determine an actual cause of death....so they have nowhere to go with the case.

she abused her child by dumping her in the woods. that right there should of had her convicted. even if the kid did drown in the pool, how did she end up in the woods. that there is child abuse, even if she is already dead.

But they did NOT prove that she is the one that dumped the body in the woods, thus they couldn't convict her on the child abuse charge.


it's the other way around. we heard alot more evidence against her that was not allowed in court or removed. the jurors heard much less evidence in this case then we have heard in the media.

Inadmissable evidence is NOT evidence.

l still don't see how she wasn't convicted. there was a rotting bodie in her car. she was lying for a whole month about where here daughter was. (she was dead in the woods). she was partying and stuff. lying about a fake nanny taking her kid. and the bodie found decomposed on the woods with tape on her mouth.

Those are two of the counts she WAS convicted of....too bad they are only misdemeanors though.
 
I'm only gonna express my personal feelings and leave it at that;

Go straight to hell, baby killer. The one person a child is supposed to be able to trust and count on above all is their mother...makes me sick.
 
I wish the judge had the balls to give her jail time instead of time served. Those female inmates don't take kindly to child killers.

Um, you do know she's been in jail since the Grand Jury indictment (approx 3 years) don't you? That's why she's going to get time served on the 4 misdemeanors. I'm sure she's been in protective custody the entire time as that's the norm in most jails/prisons for crimes like this.
 
Back
Top