greygoose
Super Freak
Re: DC's "Suicide Squad" (August 5th, 2016)
How does the updated scoreboard look now?!
tine to add jye to the scoreboard
How does the updated scoreboard look now?!
David Ayer's Academy Award winning "Suicide Squad"
- Thread starter meanstreak
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
CallMeTheDoctor
Super Freak
Re: DC's "Suicide Squad" (August 5th, 2016)
Very well said! Only for me, I wanted Jaimie Alexander as WW, cause she kills it as Sif. Physically, acting not so much lol.
He was good.
It's funny.
I remember this pic being posted when Affleck was cast as the Caped Crusader. Then again with Gadot. And then again with Fresh Prince.
Affleck, flat out owned the role and kicks ass.
Smith, turned a B character into an A.
Gadot, WOW!!! Sure, Gina Carano looks the part, but acting isn't her speciality and there is no way she could pull off an accent.
Very well said! Only for me, I wanted Jaimie Alexander as WW, cause she kills it as Sif. Physically, acting not so much lol.
Re: DC's "Suicide Squad" (August 5th, 2016)
who is hotter ?
Gal Gadot?
or
Jaimie?
who is hotter ?
Gal Gadot?
or
Jaimie?
LIBBY1957DOG
Super Freak
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2007
- Messages
- 2,345
- Reaction score
- 234
Re: DC's "Suicide Squad" (August 5th, 2016)
not seen it yet myself ,but looks likes everyones try to get in on the act or take a little credit ,seems Die Antwoord is apparently displeased with the similarity between Joker/Harley and themselves,
can see where they are coming from but i think both chicks owe a thank you to debbie harry for the use of her wardrobe lol
ty templeton has his say ,looks like this guy wont be working foe dc anytime soon
not seen it yet myself ,but looks likes everyones try to get in on the act or take a little credit ,seems Die Antwoord is apparently displeased with the similarity between Joker/Harley and themselves,
can see where they are coming from but i think both chicks owe a thank you to debbie harry for the use of her wardrobe lol
ty templeton has his say ,looks like this guy wont be working foe dc anytime soon
jye4ever
Broke and happy
Re: DC's "Suicide Squad" (August 5th, 2016)
teeth decay
at the end of the day you are getting PAID to do a JOB... this is not a hobby. this is not done on charity.
Imagine a salesman hired to sell shirts and pants, and some of the clothes are not as great, imagine that guy started to scream about the quality of the clothing....
I know the directors technically made the movie and not sold it, but it was not their property. actors and directors get hired to not only make a product but to also sell it.
thats the whole point of the press tour, they sell the product they made.
Ayer is just STILL on the Job... the job is not done once the movie is over. Trank did the equivalent of taking the ugly clothes and ripping them in front of the customers...
Imagine if spoke people for pepsi went on tv and told everyone about teeth decay
you are hired to help create a product and you make it and then you sell it. then the job is over. (thats why actors and directors tell the truth years later)
even if the movie sucks as an actor or director you just HaVE to support it.... thats why you get paid millions of dollars.
teeth decay
Re: DC's "Suicide Squad" (August 5th, 2016)
I love how Die Antwoord completely forgets that Marilyn Manson exists
look at this video and tell me thats not this joker :
Die Antwoord just looks homeless in comparison
not seen it yet myself ,but looks likes everyones try to get in on the act or take a little credit ,seems Die Antwoord is apparently displeased with the similarity between Joker/Harley and themselves,
can see where they are coming from but i think both chicks owe a thank you to debbie harry for the use of her wardrobe lol
ty templeton has his say ,looks like this guy wont be working foe dc anytime soon
I love how Die Antwoord completely forgets that Marilyn Manson exists
look at this video and tell me thats not this joker :
Die Antwoord just looks homeless in comparison
LIBBY1957DOG
Super Freak
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2007
- Messages
- 2,345
- Reaction score
- 234
Re: DC's "Suicide Squad" (August 5th, 2016)
hahaha not seen it yet as i said but yeah so far it does ,is that captain america drinking and chatting with that guy then looking disgusted at being kissed by that chick at the start ,22 second in
hahaha not seen it yet as i said but yeah so far it does ,is that captain america drinking and chatting with that guy then looking disgusted at being kissed by that chick at the start ,22 second in
Re: DC's "Suicide Squad" (August 5th, 2016)
he's disgusted because the character in the movie was his sister (in the movie the sister keeps trying to get into Capt America's pants ) really good movie, very funny. a lot of raunchy humor:
Joker is basically Manson, the tattoos, the Grill, the chains, the lipstick... the suit.
Die Antwoord is such a drama queen, it doesn't even look like him at all
hahaha not seen it yet as i said but yeah so far it does ,is that captain america drinking and chatting with that guy then looking disgusted at being kissed by that chick at the start ,22 second in
he's disgusted because the character in the movie was his sister (in the movie the sister keeps trying to get into Capt America's pants
) really good movie, very funny. a lot of raunchy humor:
Joker is basically Manson, the tattoos, the Grill, the chains, the lipstick... the suit.
Die Antwoord is such a drama queen, it doesn't even look like him at all
Last edited:
LIBBY1957DOG
Super Freak
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2007
- Messages
- 2,345
- Reaction score
- 234
Re: DC's "Suicide Squad" (August 5th, 2016)
unsurprising then ... his sister wow who knew
cheers ill look out for it looks worth a squint at least
evans has come a long way from here
unsurprising then ... his sister wow who knew
cheers ill look out for it looks worth a squint at least
evans has come a long way from here
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2010
- Messages
- 28,635
- Reaction score
- 33,608
Re: DC's "Suicide Squad" (August 5th, 2016)
He looks more like Batman.
Bruce Wayne should sue.
He looks more like Batman.
Bruce Wayne should sue.
Captain Clown
King of the Wicker People
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2013
- Messages
- 9,023
- Reaction score
- 4,534
Re: DC's "Suicide Squad" (August 5th, 2016)
Nah, he looks like the bat creature that broke out of Martha Wayne's tomb and grabbed Bruce.
Nah, he looks like the bat creature that broke out of Martha Wayne's tomb and grabbed Bruce.
Re: DC's "Suicide Squad" (August 5th, 2016)
He looks more like Batman.
Bruce Wayne should sue.
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2010
- Messages
- 28,635
- Reaction score
- 33,608
Re: DC's "Suicide Squad" (August 5th, 2016)
No.
Issa Batman.
No.
Issa Batman.
Captain Clown
King of the Wicker People
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2013
- Messages
- 9,023
- Reaction score
- 4,534
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2009
- Messages
- 15,220
- Reaction score
- 158
Re: DC's "Suicide Squad" (August 5th, 2016)
It's a LOT more complex than that.
Director's are indeed doing a "job", but like any artist (not factory worker) you will be judged by the creative integrity of final product and that in the long term can drastically effect the rest of your career. It's money clashing with art. Film reviewers think they are art reviewers, studios think they are a business (with sprinklings of artist integrity, but only if it's financially sound).
It's whether you can pay your tax bills in 5 years time. Not some "hobby" as you mentioned. It's the real world kid. So watching from the shadows while a studio potentially destroys your artistic vision is a dangerous thing. Because in several months time you will be asked to go and sell whatever piece of **** THEY have created. Those sneaky committee cutting fingers disappear into the woodwork and you are left to take the rap. It's your vision, except it's not. very dangerous not just on this movie, but on your next project your career. Thats a very careful line to walk, play good dog with the studios or try to protect your own invested interests. There is no right and wrong move in a situation like this as it is just that, very situational. What Trank did was stupid, he wasn't in a position to act like a petulant spoilt brat, and he came across as just that. But if he had played ball with the studio the movie would have still tanked and he would have been labelled as a hack. It's lose lose. And before you start talking about the amount of money directors get paid and that it's a city baby response, it's not.
Sure you get paid a **** load of money on a project, but you may not work again for a couple of years on a feature and if your project flops and is destroyed by a studio, you take the rap financially. Directors for the most part are studio scape goats in this day and age. Unless you hit a certain level, but even JJ had holy war with Disney behind the scenes on SW.
Anyway my point being, your analogy to doing a job is not accurate. Just like musicians fight with record labels it's about artist product being misrepresented to the public and the LONGTERM ramifications of that. Play ball take the cash and have a short ****** career or fight the system, speak publicly and risk being blacklisted by the studio. Generally going against the studio is slow motion suicide.
Ayer made his decision and he got lucky, the movie has made $$$$$$. But if it had not the studios would have blamed him, the movie was critically panned and his name dragged professionally through the mud. That **** does matter in the real world because it's as real as getting fired from a job, in front of 100 million people, getting the next job is not so easy.
It's a gamble pure and simple, it worked for Ayer, lets see how Gareth Edwards gets on.. it may not be so rosy.
Or Snyder's JL. Big box office? doesn't matter about who did what, perceivable flop.. blame the director.
Ass-biscuits served two ways.
at the end of the day you are getting PAID to do a JOB... this is not a hobby. this is not done on charity.
Imagine a salesman hired to sell shirts and pants, and some of the clothes are not as great, imagine that guy started to scream about the quality of the clothing....
I know the directors technically made the movie and not sold it, but it was not their property. actors and directors get hired to not only make a product but to also sell it.
thats the whole point of the press tour, they sell the product they made.
Ayer is just STILL on the Job... the job is not done once the movie is over. Trank did the equivalent of taking the ugly clothes and ripping them in front of the customers...
Imagine if spoke people for pepsi went on tv and told everyone about teeth decay
you are hired to help create a product and you make it and then you sell it. then the job is over. (thats why actors and directors tell the truth years later)
even if the movie sucks as an actor or director you just HaVE to support it.... thats why you get paid millions of dollars.
It's a LOT more complex than that.
Director's are indeed doing a "job", but like any artist (not factory worker) you will be judged by the creative integrity of final product and that in the long term can drastically effect the rest of your career. It's money clashing with art. Film reviewers think they are art reviewers, studios think they are a business (with sprinklings of artist integrity, but only if it's financially sound).
It's whether you can pay your tax bills in 5 years time. Not some "hobby" as you mentioned. It's the real world kid. So watching from the shadows while a studio potentially destroys your artistic vision is a dangerous thing. Because in several months time you will be asked to go and sell whatever piece of **** THEY have created. Those sneaky committee cutting fingers disappear into the woodwork and you are left to take the rap. It's your vision, except it's not. very dangerous not just on this movie, but on your next project your career. Thats a very careful line to walk, play good dog with the studios or try to protect your own invested interests. There is no right and wrong move in a situation like this as it is just that, very situational. What Trank did was stupid, he wasn't in a position to act like a petulant spoilt brat, and he came across as just that. But if he had played ball with the studio the movie would have still tanked and he would have been labelled as a hack. It's lose lose. And before you start talking about the amount of money directors get paid and that it's a city baby response, it's not.
Sure you get paid a **** load of money on a project, but you may not work again for a couple of years on a feature and if your project flops and is destroyed by a studio, you take the rap financially. Directors for the most part are studio scape goats in this day and age. Unless you hit a certain level, but even JJ had holy war with Disney behind the scenes on SW.
Anyway my point being, your analogy to doing a job is not accurate. Just like musicians fight with record labels it's about artist product being misrepresented to the public and the LONGTERM ramifications of that. Play ball take the cash and have a short ****** career or fight the system, speak publicly and risk being blacklisted by the studio. Generally going against the studio is slow motion suicide.
Ayer made his decision and he got lucky, the movie has made $$$$$$. But if it had not the studios would have blamed him, the movie was critically panned and his name dragged professionally through the mud. That **** does matter in the real world because it's as real as getting fired from a job, in front of 100 million people, getting the next job is not so easy.
It's a gamble pure and simple, it worked for Ayer, lets see how Gareth Edwards gets on.. it may not be so rosy.
Or Snyder's JL. Big box office? doesn't matter about who did what, perceivable flop.. blame the director.
Ass-biscuits served two ways.
Last edited:
Re: DC's "Suicide Squad" (August 5th, 2016)
was there ever any doubt?
Mm mm...Debra Harry.
tine to add jye to the scoreboard
was there ever any doubt?
Mm mm...Debra Harry.
jye4ever
Broke and happy
Re: DC's "Suicide Squad" (August 5th, 2016)
I liked Incubus body, just his silly weapon x head piece that I didn't like.
Believe me if the movie sucked I would've destroyed it in here, like I did with that POS ID4 sequel.
Team pturtle was not in my cards.
Holy Debbie Harry Harley clone.
I liked Incubus body, just his silly weapon x head piece that I didn't like.
The jye love is strong in this thread. He will now become the tent-pole that will keep this thread head-and-shoulders above the rest.
Believe me if the movie sucked I would've destroyed it in here, like I did with that POS ID4 sequel.
tine to add jye to the scoreboard
Team pturtle was not in my cards.
Holy Debbie Harry Harley clone.
EVILFACE
Insufferable S.O.B.
Re: DC's "Suicide Squad" (August 5th, 2016)
She was so hawt in the 70's and early 80's.
was there ever any doubt?
Mm mm...Debra Harry.
She was so hawt in the 70's and early 80's.
BlueberryJerry
Super Freak
Re: DC's "Suicide Squad" (August 5th, 2016)
New scores. How many times you've seen the flick Zach? I'll add that in there if it's changed.
New scores. How many times you've seen the flick Zach?
I'll add that in there if it's changed.
Similar threads
