Who cares if it's a woman, couldn't the Doctor be anything?
So when would it be ok to have a woman Doctor? Ever?
There have been like 15 incarnations of Doctor who. Doctor who has been old, young, blonde, brunette. All those times I read no outrage.
Under what circumstances would it be acceptable to have a woman as Doctor who? Or is there some gender lock on a char crater that keep "reincarnating"?
Under the same circumstances that Wonder Woman should be male.
What does either change add to the character besides an unnecessary face-lift?
Idris Elba or Colin Salmon would make perfect Doctors, they both are an age that can get across the sense of wisdom that anyone under 45 will struggle to do. I'm just waiting for the Doctor to be a lesbian now...
Under the same circumstances that Wonder Woman should be male.
What does either change add to the character besides an unnecessary face-lift?
I haven't heard anybody say James Bond should be a woman. Yet.
i wasnt trying to bait. wasnt trying to be a smartass either, im genuinely wonderingDangerous bait.
Awful analogy. By definition WW is a woman. If you change her gender the character is no longer Wonder Woman. Her gender is central to her story and her character.
Is that the same case for Doctor who?
OK, I'll say it: in most cases I think gender swap is 'worse'. I say that after considering making James Bond a female. Or Speed Racer, or Ghostbusters... Or Dorothy as a little boy, or The Little Merman.
Some cases are far less dramatic of course, and some might even benefit. But in general it seems like you can switch nationality quite easily, race seems harder for people to digest, and finally gender. Just look at our Presidential elections for proof.
Awful analogy. By definition WW is a woman. If you change her gender the character is no longer Wonder Woman. Her gender is central to her story and her character.
Is that the same case for Doctor who?
ghostbusters is a bad example because that movie was completely loaded with political tones. the casting itself was a political move. But if they got emma stone and they got the two girls from the show Community or the girls from Big Bang theory, i could have seen that ghostbusters movie being really well received though.
Colour of skin is just that colour, it's the same as hair colour so why should it matter? When you get down to gender it's an all together different package with the different hormones and everything else associated with the differing sexes.
So if they show Susan does she still call the Doctor Grandad? It wouldn't matter if the Doctor was black, Asian, oriental or Latino they'd still have the same relationship with the audience and the show's history. If they want a female Timelord then why not just create one or bring back Romana...but then that would be appeasing the original DW fans and it seems they don't want to do that to much.
Granted, but I couldn't at that moment think of another female example -- Dorothy from OZ would be a better example; no reason she couldn't be a little farm boy.
But you didn't really answer the main question: what does the gender change add to the character? Why do it at all?
What is it with people criticizing an example but not answering the core question? And why is it in concept a bad example? It is a perfect example of a totally unnecessary change -- its only purpose was as an excuse to reboot a well-known franchise for financial reasons.
Did all of the 15 previous doctors "add to the character"? Did you even ask that question when a new Doctor came on?
How would have doing the same thing for the last 15 times been adding to the character?
Just out of curiosity, who would've liked it if this was the image announcing the 13th Doctor?
View attachment 353243
If you're going to answer a question with a question then we can't play anymore.
People here have answered your question above, like Magpie, read it. Changing gender begs the question: why? If you don't see a difference then you're just being idealistic.
Enter your email address to join: