Ebola scaring anyone?

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Who's afraid?

  • Yes

    Votes: 18 18.9%
  • No

    Votes: 65 68.4%
  • Whatever

    Votes: 12 12.6%

  • Total voters
    95
Alex Jones is beating his junk with hammerfists 24-hours a day at this point, where this story is involved.
 
Swaggart and Bakker could take a lesson from that suckbag ******* on mewling supplication of embracing stupid ideas.
 
I vote that we send him over there. He's got some good ideas...

 
You don't allow flights into the country from West Africa. And if that is too complex, you don't let them out.

And what is the 'moral question'? :dunno

What if people are coming from west Africa on an indirect route. If it was a viable option I think it would have been done, in a global economy I don't see that happening. Not letting them leave makes more sense. But if that were to happen then someone would have to house/look after them to some degree which takes time and money, who's gonna do that?

People will continue to go and help out of moral obligation, right or wrong. The US getting involved definitely has something to do with self interest along with the moral obligation.
 
I absolutely cherish the fact that doctors are the ones putting the rest of the population at risk now. First Nancy Snyderman, now this Craig Spencer dude.

Isn't that something? They should know better. Same with the nurses.
 
What if people are coming from west Africa on an indirect route. If it was a viable option I think it would have been done, in a global economy I don't see that happening. Not letting them leave makes more sense. But if that were to happen then someone would have to house/look after them to some degree which takes time and money, who's gonna do that?

People will continue to go and help out of moral obligation, right or wrong. The US getting involved definitely has something to do with self interest along with the moral obligation.

wasn't that exactly what happened with the first dude that came here?
 
Can we please take off the stupid "TEH END IZ NIGH" placards now? CNN & Fox did their jobs as well as they're paid to do, but this really isn't going to be the thing that destroys America.
 
What if people are coming from west Africa on an indirect route.

As far as I know, there is no direct air route from West Africa.

If it was a viable option I think it would have been done, in a global economy I don't see that happening.

I doubt it.

Not letting them leave makes more sense. But if that were to happen then someone would have to house/look after them to some degree which takes time and money, who's gonna do that?

Whoever gets paid to give a **** about these kinds of things. $3 trillion was collected this year in taxes. It couldn't have all gone to tips for the President's caddy.

People will continue to go and help out of moral obligation, right or wrong. The US getting involved definitely has something to do with self interest along with the moral obligation.

Self-interest is a moral obligation for people who give a **** about not dying from ebola. A government that gives a **** about the self-interest of its citizens acts to prevent them dying from ebola. A government that doesn't give a **** should stop being paid to keep up appearances (barely), get the hell out of the way, and allow competent private citizens to protect their own self-interest. That would be the moral thing to do. Anything less is hypocritical posturing.
 
That's a whole lot of brave-facing. What do you propose competent private citizens do, specifically?
 
pray.:pray:

to raptor jesus.:lecture

RaptorJesus.gif
 
Back
Top