thenammagazine
Super Freak
Is it my turn? Ok, i'll bite.
The over the top amount of gore was part the comedy But that still doesn't make my point wrong. What are you laughing at during the Lawnmower scene? The gore. THE GORE. That's what makes it funny. Blood shooting in every direction, spurting all over the place to a really insane level.
Django was the same way. And done deliberately. You get the harsh, realistic violence, that makes you look away in disgust, and then you get the comical, over the top cathartic violence, where people just EXPLODE.
And who mentioned Hostel and Saw? Those movies tried and failed to be intense realistic violent movies. (I said failed.) But this movie? I'm not sure yet.
...wait...
Actually, I have no ****ing idea what this argument is about, and why you're getting on my case about it.
Gore isn't funny? Well, **** yeah it is. Or it is to me. When people explode in comical ways, it's great. When Ash gets blasted with 4 gallons of blood in the face from one person is hysterical. When Lionel takes out his lawnmower and decimates the zombies is a riot. Were you trying to say that's not what MADE the movie funny, but was a part of it? Yes. Of course it was. But that doesn't make the that scene unfunny.
I wasn't laughing at the gore during that scene, nor was, I'm willing to bet, 90% of the viewing audience. I was laughing at the absurdity of someone strapping a lawnmower to their person, turning it on and using the open blade to kill zombies. That's not the gore, that's the situation. You're saying the blood splashing on Ash's face was the funny part. Wrong again, it's Ash's reaction to it. If you're laughing at the sheer amounts of blood, you missed the whole point of the scene and you're pretty naive to assume that's the whole point (the gore). You're making some huge misconceptions here, incorrectly attempting to link films together and as I said earlier, it's bordering on some seriously Nova-esque defense of this film.