Evil Dead (2013) Comic Con Trailer Footage

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
It puts some of my issues to rest....but eh.

I did laugh at this...

Well, look at Liam Neeson in Taken and Taken 2.

No, you look at Liam Neeson! You know? Whatever! I heard the movie sucked ass. I mean, like severely sucked ass. Whatever, everybody does what they do. We don’t have to make another one. This’ll be a nice little candy bar for anyone who wants an Evil Dead experience. They’re gonna be just fine.

Hahaha. Taken 2 sucked indeed.
 
I'm all for remakes as long as they're actually good.

Some movies, that people think are originals, are in fact remakes. But no one knocks them for it.

Just a couple of examples, The Fly (1986) and John Carpenter's The Thing (1982).

Two great movies (yes, I know that's subjective) that I've even read others say are superior to their original counterparts.

The fly would be an awesome remake and so would jaws. We need a new shark movie to get the bad taste of shark night out of peoples minds.

Leave Jaws the f__k alone!!! The Fly might make for a pretty good remake however :dunno

:lecture See! I told you! :rotfl
 
I actually thought Ringu was better. But other examples I felt were marginal improvements were the TCM, F13th and Amityville remakes. Well thought out examples that don't tarnish, and marginally improve upon, the classics.

I also thought Ringu was the superior movie of the two, although I did enjoy the American version as well.
 
Some movies, that people think are originals, are in fact remakes. But no one knocks them for it.

Just a couple of examples, The Fly (1986) and John Carpenter's The Thing (1982).

That's because they're not really "remakes" i.e. they are not the same exact stories with just updated FX, etc. Other than their titles, the two examples you listed really have nothing in common with their original versions. Not to mention both of the originals are black and white films.
 
The first Evil Dead is scary as hell, but part of what makes it fun is the dark humor in it. Will the remake have that humorous undertone?

Well, the dark humor in the first one is because we were bad actors delivering lousy dialogue. So let’s call a spade a spade, here.

See, even Bruce admits it.
 
Oh cmon, we all know that he's gonna say anything just so we decide to go and see this.
He's just a producer and it's all about $$$ after all.
 
Oh cmon, we all know that he's gonna say anything just so we decide to go and see this.
He's just a producer and it's all about $$$ after all.

I have to agree with Riddick here.
He is basically hyping up the movie. Yeah I am sure they have some faith in the project and want to see it succeed but he sounds like this is the second coming for Horror movies which is not. he is talking about how these actors are so much better and how this movie will freak audiences out and it probably won't. It might be a good movie but he is making it sound bigger than it will be.
 
It puts some of my issues to rest....but eh.

I did laugh at this...

Hahaha. Taken 2 sucked indeed.

Or, he's giving his honest opinion.

Meh, anybody still watching Burn Notice knows that Sam Axe is an aging Ashley Williams. There's no reason he couldn't have reprised the role. He's just whoring himself out for the cash, which he also admittedly does and spoofed it in My Name is Bruce. :lol
 
Last edited:
Looks violent

Since some hate the concept of a re imagining or remake, I'd have called this a sequel (technically); I propose the following title:

EVIL DEAD 4: Book of the Dead 1
 
Last edited:
Back
Top