Explosion in Boston?

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
No, those are the reasons. That is why we were in Iraq. That is why we're in Afghanistan. That is why we're in Pakistan. Stop sheltering and making excuses for the cause of your own problems and we won't be one anymore.
 
I would love to see how some of you knuckleheads would have handled the same situation.


The members of the manhunt did not hurt the wrong people and they caught the perps.


Wow...they suck.:slap:cuckoo::rolleyes2
 
No, those are the reasons. That is why we were in Iraq. That is why we're in Afghanistan. That is why we're in Pakistan. Stop sheltering and making excuses for the cause of your own problems and we won't be one anymore.

Nope.

Radical imams don't just pop up out of thin air. They are radicalized using some event of actual or perceived injustice.

Let's not forget who created the king daddy of all radicalized terrorists.
 
I heard they read a book.

Yeah, give devil some power, see what he does with it. Worrying about collateral damage is for *****'s. This what those cops were doing in that house. They'd be willing to take one of those people's life if they resisted, all for the sake of one man.

I ask you, what is the point of protecting this family from one terrorist when you're just gonna become the terrorist yourself by going through these type of searches and possibly killing someone?

See what I'm talking about.

You're talking out your ***, and it smells.
 
https://govtslaves.info/oregon-emt-graduate-questions-boston-bombings-use-of-actors/ This has got to be the most idiotic post I have ever seen. The dude or girl is apparently in the field of EMS yet has no idea wtf he is talking about. I'm an EMT and while looking through the comments I found one person that described everything I was thinking while reading this.

heres the quote Oh my goodness ... Seriously? Being an EMT-B makes you an expert? May it never be so ...

I've been through the same training, and have even gone to the next level. In addition, I'm a former combat medic. I have far more training than you, but even I know I'm not an expert.

That said - I *know* you were taught that traumatic amputations rarely bleed out, especially not immediately. I *know* you were taught that traumatically severed blood vessels have a tendency to pull back and withdraw into the skin from the shock and trauma of amputation. I *know* you were taught that in such cases, the blood loss will be minimal - nothing like the 5-6 liters you claim. I *know* you were taught the time frame from amputation until the blood vessels loosen up and start bleeding is more than enough time to apply a tourniquet. I *know* you were also taught basic anatomy, which includes that the femoral artery narrows and bifurcates before it gets to the knee. Both of this man's amputations were below the knee - there was no bleeding from the femoral arteries.

I also know you were taught how to triage in the event of a mass casualty situation - which includes treatment for immediately life-threatening injuries (such as placing a tourniquet on a traumatic amputation) and placing a traumatic brain injury (which it appears this black woman in the red sweater may have had) ahead of the triage line.

How do I know all this? Because as an Army medic, as an EMT-B and again as an EMT-I, I was also taught all these things. If you have forgotten these basic lessons from your training, I fear for any other patients you have to treat in the event of an emergency.

Either that, or you are lying about your training. Quite a real possibility. I highly doubt they went through any EMS training with out even thinking of these possibilities.
 
Yeah, give devil some power, see what he does with it. Worrying about collateral damage is for *****'s. This what those cops were doing in that house. They'd be willing to take one of those people's life if they resisted, all for the sake of one man.

I ask you, what is the point of protecting this family from one terrorist when you're just gonna become the terrorist yourself by going through these type of searches and possibly killing someone?

See what I'm talking about.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It is easy to see what you are talking about.


And you are still wrong.

To say that those officers would haver been happy to kill an innocent resident of one of the houses they were searching is irresponsible at best and an outright lie at worst. You do not know what those people were thinking. And they are well-trained to handle the situations.

It sounds to me like you are assuming that every cop on Earth is an evil murdering Nazi in full bloom.

You are drinking the media kool-aid.
 
It is easy to see what you are talking about.


And you are still wrong.

To say that those officers would haver been happy to kill an innocent resident of one of the houses they were searching is irresponsible at best and an outright lie at worst. You do not know what those people were thinking. And they are well-trained to handle the situations.

It sounds to me like you are assuming that every cop on Earth is an evil murdering Nazi in full bloom.

You are drinking the media kool-aid.

You're right, they wouldn't just kill innocent people, just as long as they're Americans.
 
Never going to solve the terrorism problem until the reasons for its existence are recognized and dealt with.

How many U.S. drones killed innocent Muslims while trying to get radicals hiding amongst them before 9/11?

None

We weren't in Afganistan and we weren't in Irag before 9/11.
We had comparatively low profile in the middle east before that.

Interesting you give the benefit of the doubt to the terrorists in that they have a "legitimate" reason to do the things they do but not to American forces.
 
How many U.S. drones killed innocent Muslims while trying to get radicals hiding amongst them before 9/11?

None

We weren't in Afganistan and we weren't in Irag before 9/11.
We had comparatively low profile in the middle east before that.

Interesting you give the benefit of the doubt to the terrorists in that they have a "legitimate" reason to do the things they do but to American forces.

And how's the problem of terrorism been since the US entered Afghanistan and Iraq?

A lot worse.

Oh wait, I guess you guys don't consider the 40,000 innocent people killed in Pakistan alone since 9/11 due to terrorist acts as terrorism. They didn't involve American civilians :dunno
 
Nothing like a bombing by Muslims in America to create a soapbox for Muslims angry at America.

That's why this thread is here, right?

Right because bombings by America on Muslims aren't even newsworthy, such is their frequency.

Said what I needed to say here.

Regarding the topic - as I said before, glad the episode is over with no further loss of life. Hopefully the surviving one lives to be able to answer his allegations and the public gets to find out the full story.
 
Right because bombings by America on Muslims aren't even newsworthy, such is their frequency.

Which ones should we report? The imaginary 40,000?

Or the roughly 2000 total (militant and civilian) that Islamabad-based Conflict Monitoring Center estimated in 2011?

Highest estimates I've found up to 2013 are around 3,500, with the highest estimate of civilians being under 1,000, the lowest being under 500.
 
Back
Top