galactiboy
OT Preferist
I think you about summed it up, also reusability (high with Kenobi, low with Gandalf) is a factor and we still don't know what the edition size is for Gandalf.
Take off the head and robe, and you have about 100 different clone releases. Maybe the most reusable work they have ever done.
Gandalf is pretty unique.
That's true, and I think it might help explain why Obi-wan is cheaper than some had predicted. But it doesn't explain why Gandalf is so expensive. After all, every single LOTR figure up until now has had outfits that were pretty much unique.
After all, every single LOTR figure up until now has had outfits that were pretty much unique.
The way Aragorn turned out did did make people lose interest.
Aragorn didn't turn out that bad. Not great but its a good figure and if people bailed after just 1 figure that's just dumb.
It is a good figure. The only problem was the paint. Same can be said for Faramir. But for most people who don't have their figures repainted, the paint can make or break a figure, so I think his comment actually isn't far off.
As far as the prototype goes, I agree 100%. However, we have yet to see whether the mass-produced paint apps can even come close to matching the proto. I'll be very surprised it they do. But, of course, my order is still in (has been since day one), obsessive-compulsive Gandalf fan that I am.Gandalf, though, looks to be the best of them all. I'm frankly shocked and stunned to find that some people don't see Ian in this; if you ask me it's the single best iteration of Ian as Gandalf I've ever seen! Absolutely FLAWLESS. If you ask me, that is.
Enter your email address to join: